Literature DB >> 10788424

Sulfite:Cytochrome c oxidoreductase from Thiobacillus novellus. Purification, characterization, and molecular biology of a heterodimeric member of the sulfite oxidase family.

U Kappler1, B Bennett, J Rethmeier, G Schwarz, R Deutzmann, A G McEwan, C Dahl.   

Abstract

Direct oxidation of sulfite to sulfate occurs in various photo- and chemotrophic sulfur oxidizing microorganisms as the final step in the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds and is catalyzed by sulfite:cytochrome c oxidoreductase (EC ). Here we show that the enzyme from Thiobacillus novellus is a periplasmically located alphabeta heterodimer, consisting of a 40.6-kDa subunit containing a molybdenum cofactor and an 8.8-kDa mono-heme cytochrome c(552) subunit (midpoint redox potential, E(m8.0) = +280 mV). The organic component of the molybdenum cofactor was identified as molybdopterin contained in a 1:1 ratio to the Mo content of the enzyme. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed the presence of a sulfite-inducible Mo(V) signal characteristic of sulfite:acceptor oxidoreductases. However, pH-dependent changes in the electron paramagnetic resonance signal were not detected. Kinetic studies showed that the enzyme exhibits a ping-pong mechanism involving two reactive sites. K(m) values for sulfite and cytochrome c(550) were determined to be 27 and 4 micrometer, respectively; the enzyme was found to be reversibly inhibited by sulfate and various buffer ions. The sorAB genes, which encode the enzyme, appear to form an operon, which is preceded by a putative extracytoplasmic function-type promoter and contains a hairpin loop termination structure downstream of sorB. While SorA exhibits significant similarities to known sequences of eukaryotic and bacterial sulfite:acceptor oxidoreductases, SorB does not appear to be closely related to any known c-type cytochromes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10788424     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  38 in total

Review 1.  Oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur compounds by bacteria: emergence of a common mechanism?

Authors:  C G Friedrich; D Rother; F Bardischewsky; A Quentmeier; J Fischer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  L-cysteate sulpho-lyase, a widespread pyridoxal 5'-phosphate-coupled desulphonative enzyme purified from Silicibacter pomeroyi DSS-3(T).

Authors:  Karin Denger; Theo H M Smits; Alasdair M Cook
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  HIGH-RESOLUTION EPR SPECTROSCOPY OF MO ENZYMES. SULFITE OXIDASES: STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS.

Authors:  John H Enemark; A V Astashkin; A M Raitsimring
Journal:  Biol Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  Molecular basis for enzymatic sulfite oxidation: how three conserved active site residues shape enzyme activity.

Authors:  Susan Bailey; Trevor Rapson; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Andrei V Astashkin; John H Enemark; Ulrike Kappler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Allying with armored snails: the complete genome of gammaproteobacterial endosymbiont.

Authors:  Satoshi Nakagawa; Shigeru Shimamura; Yoshihiro Takaki; Yohey Suzuki; Shun-ichi Murakami; Tamaki Watanabe; So Fujiyoshi; Sayaka Mino; Tomoo Sawabe; Takahiro Maeda; Hiroko Makita; Suguru Nemoto; Shin-Ichiro Nishimura; Hiromi Watanabe; Tomo-o Watsuji; Ken Takai
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Enhanced adsorption of arsenic through the oxidative treatment of reduced aquifer solids.

Authors:  Jenna R Huling; Scott G Huling; Ralph Ludwig
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Single-cell enabled comparative genomics of a deep ocean SAR11 bathytype.

Authors:  J Cameron Thrash; Ben Temperton; Brandon K Swan; Zachary C Landry; Tanja Woyke; Edward F DeLong; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Stephan J Giovannoni
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 8.  Sulfite-oxidizing enzymes.

Authors:  Ulrike Kappler; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Pulsed EPR investigations of the Mo(V) centers of the R55Q and R55M variants of sulfite dehydrogenase from Starkeya novella.

Authors:  Trevor D Rapson; Andrei V Astashkin; Kayunta Johnson-Winters; Paul V Bernhardt; Ulrike Kappler; Arnold M Raitsimring; John H Enemark
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 3.358

Review 10.  Sulfite oxidizing enzymes.

Authors:  Changjian Feng; Gordon Tollin; John H Enemark
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.