Literature DB >> 27650963

Differential bioavailability of polychlorinated biphenyls associated with environmental particles: Microplastic in comparison to wood, coal and biochar.

B Beckingham1, U Ghosh2.   

Abstract

Microplastic particles are increasingly being discovered in diverse habitats and a host of species are found to ingest them. Since plastics are known to sorb hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) there is a question of what risk of chemical exposure is posed to aquatic biota from microplastic-associated contaminants. We investigate bioavailability of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from polypropylene microplastic by measuring solid-water distribution coefficients, gut fluid solubilization, and bioaccumulation using sediment invertebrate worms as a test system. Microplastic-associated PCBs are placed in a differential bioavailability framework by comparing the results to several other natural and anthrogenic particles, including wood, coal, and biochar. PCB distribution coefficients for polypropylene were higher than natural organic materials like wood, but in the range of lipids and sediment organic carbon, and smaller than black carbons like coal and biochars. Gut fluid solubilization potential increased in the order: coal < polypropylene < biochar < wood. Interestingly, lower gut fluid solubilization for polypropylene than biochar infers that gut fluid micelles may have solubilized part of the biochar matrix while bioaccessibility from plastic can be limited by the solubilizing potential of gut fluids dependent on the solid to liquid ratio or renewal of fluids in the gut. Biouptake in worms was lower by 76% when PCBs were associated with polypropylene compared to sediment. The presence of microplastics in sediments had an overall impact of reducing bioavailability and transfer of HOCs to sediment-ingesting organisms. Since the vast majority of sediment and suspended particles in the environment are natural organic and inorganic materials, pollutant transfer through particle ingestion will be dominated by these particles and not microplastics. Therefore, these results support the conclusion that in most cases the transfer of organic pollutants to aquatic organisms from microplastic in the diet is likely a small contribution compared to other natural pathways of exposure. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioavailability; Black carbon; Gut fluid; Microplastic; Polychlorinated biphenyls

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27650963     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  14 in total

1.  Sources, transport, measurement and impact of nano and microplastics in urban watersheds.

Authors:  Quinn T Birch; Phillip M Potter; Patricio X Pinto; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Souhail R Al-Abed
Journal:  Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 8.044

Review 2.  Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research.

Authors:  Leisha M A Martin; Nin Gan; Erica Wang; Mackenzie Merrill; Wei Xu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Feeding type and development drive the ingestion of microplastics by freshwater invertebrates.

Authors:  Christian Scherer; Nicole Brennholt; Georg Reifferscheid; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The Effect of Microplastic on the Uptake of Chemicals by the Lugworm Arenicola marina (L.) under Environmentally Relevant Exposure Conditions.

Authors:  Ellen Besseling; Edwin M Foekema; Martine J van den Heuvel-Greve; Albert A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Accumulation of Plastic Debris and Associated Contaminants in Aquatic Food Webs.

Authors:  Noël J Diepens; Albert A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Wastewater treatment plants as a source of microplastics to an urban estuary: Removal efficiencies and loading per capita over one year.

Authors:  Kenda Conley; Allan Clum; Jestine Deepe; Haven Lane; Barbara Beckingham
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2019-04-10

7.  A combined experimental and modeling study to evaluate pH-dependent sorption of polar and non-polar compounds to polyethylene and polystyrene microplastics.

Authors:  Sven Seidensticker; Peter Grathwohl; Jonas Lamprecht; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.893

8.  Microplastics Reduce Short-Term Effects of Environmental Contaminants. Part I: Effects of Bisphenol A on Freshwater Zooplankton Are Lower in Presence of Polyamide Particles.

Authors:  Saskia Rehse; Werner Kloas; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Microplastics Reduce Short-Term Effects of Environmental Contaminants. Part II: Polyethylene Particles Decrease the Effect of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Microorganisms.

Authors:  Julia Kleinteich; Sven Seidensticker; Nikolaj Marggrander; Christiane Zarfl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Marine litter plastics and microplastics and their toxic chemicals components: the need for urgent preventive measures.

Authors:  Frederic Gallo; Cristina Fossi; Roland Weber; David Santillo; Joao Sousa; Imogen Ingram; Angel Nadal; Dolores Romano
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 5.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.