RATIONALE: The clumped isotope composition of CO2 (Δ47 ) derived from carbonate is widely used as a paleotemperature proxy with broad applications in geoscience. Its accuracy is, however, limited by inter-laboratory discrepancies of reference materials and disagreement among carbonate geothermometer calibrations. Here we show how the correction for the abundance of 17 O influences these discrepancies. METHODS: We used CO2 -H2 O equilibration at known temperatures and phosphoric acid digested carbonates to generate CO2 samples with a wide range in 13 C and 18 O compositions. All samples were purified using an offline vacuum line. We used a Thermo MAT 253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer with a Faraday collector array for m/z 44-49, to measure δ13 C, δ18 O, δ47 , and Δ47 values. Data were compiled using a traditional correction ('Santrock') for the 17 O interference in m/z 45 as well as a more recently proposed correction ('Brand') for 17 O interference. Two reference frames using CO2 with distinct 13 C compositions were constructed to simulate an inter-laboratory comparison. RESULTS: The traditional Santrock 17 O correction leads to a simulated Δ47 inter-laboratory comparison offset of 0.06 ‰, and a 0.1 ‰ Δ47 range in CO2 -H2 O 23°C equilibrations that is dependent on the 13 C composition. The more recent Brand 17 O correction removes these discrepancies. The traditional 17 O correction yields distinct temperature-Δ47 calibration curves for synthetic carbonates precipitated using different methods to degas CO2 , while the more recent 17 O correction collapses all calibration data onto a single curve. CONCLUSIONS: The 17 O correction strategy employed by CO2 and carbonate clumped-isotope researchers can have a large effect on the accuracy of Δ47 values. Use of the traditional 17 O correction may have caused errors in published studies as large as 0.1 ‰ and may account for Δ47 differences among laboratories and disagreement among previously published carbonate clumped isotope thermometry calibrations.
RATIONALE: The clumped isotope composition of CO2 (Δ47 ) derived from carbonate is widely used as a paleotemperature proxy with broad applications in geoscience. Its accuracy is, however, limited by inter-laboratory discrepancies of reference materials and disagreement among carbonate geothermometer calibrations. Here we show how the correction for the abundance of 17 O influences these discrepancies. METHODS: We used CO2 -H2 O equilibration at known temperatures and phosphoric acid digested carbonates to generate CO2 samples with a wide range in 13 C and 18 O compositions. All samples were purified using an offline vacuum line. We used a Thermo MAT 253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer with a Faraday collector array for m/z 44-49, to measure δ13 C, δ18 O, δ47 , and Δ47 values. Data were compiled using a traditional correction ('Santrock') for the 17 O interference in m/z 45 as well as a more recently proposed correction ('Brand') for 17 O interference. Two reference frames using CO2 with distinct 13 C compositions were constructed to simulate an inter-laboratory comparison. RESULTS: The traditional Santrock 17 O correction leads to a simulated Δ47 inter-laboratory comparison offset of 0.06 ‰, and a 0.1 ‰ Δ47 range in CO2 -H2 O 23°C equilibrations that is dependent on the 13 C composition. The more recent Brand 17 O correction removes these discrepancies. The traditional 17 O correction yields distinct temperature-Δ47 calibration curves for synthetic carbonates precipitated using different methods to degas CO2 , while the more recent 17 O correction collapses all calibration data onto a single curve. CONCLUSIONS: The 17 O correction strategy employed by CO2 and carbonate clumped-isotope researchers can have a large effect on the accuracy of Δ47 values. Use of the traditional 17 O correction may have caused errors in published studies as large as 0.1 ‰ and may account for Δ47 differences among laboratories and disagreement among previously published carbonate clumped isotope thermometry calibrations.
Authors: Sora L Kim; Sarah S Zeichner; Albert S Colman; Howie D Scher; Jürgen Kriwet; Thomas Mörs; Matthew Huber Journal: Paleoceanogr Paleoclimatol Date: 2020-12-08
Authors: Peter Müller; Philip T Staudigel; Sean T Murray; Robert Vernet; Jean-Paul Barusseau; Hildegard Westphal; Peter K Swart Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Stefano M Bernasconi; Inigo A Müller; Kristin D Bergmann; Sebastian F M Breitenbach; Alvaro Fernandez; David A Hodell; Madalina Jaggi; Anna Nele Meckler; Isabel Millan; Martin Ziegler Journal: Geochem Geophys Geosyst Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: S M Bernasconi; M Daëron; K D Bergmann; M Bonifacie; A N Meckler; H P Affek; N Anderson; D Bajnai; E Barkan; E Beverly; D Blamart; L Burgener; D Calmels; C Chaduteau; M Clog; B Davidheiser-Kroll; A Davies; F Dux; J Eiler; B Elliott; A C Fetrow; J Fiebig; S Goldberg; M Hermoso; K W Huntington; E Hyland; M Ingalls; M Jaggi; C M John; A B Jost; S Katz; J Kelson; T Kluge; I J Kocken; A Laskar; T J Leutert; D Liang; J Lucarelli; T J Mackey; X Mangenot; N Meinicke; S E Modestou; I A Müller; S Murray; A Neary; N Packard; B H Passey; E Pelletier; S Petersen; A Piasecki; A Schauer; K E Snell; P K Swart; A Tripati; D Upadhyay; T Vennemann; I Winkelstern; D Yarian; N Yoshida; N Zhang; M Ziegler Journal: Geochem Geophys Geosyst Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Getachew Agmuas Adnew; Magdalena E G Hofmann; Thijs L Pons; Gerbrand Koren; Martin Ziegler; Lucas J Lourens; Thomas Röckmann Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Philip T Staudigel; Peter K Swart; Ali Pourmand; Carmen A Laguer-Díaz; William J Pestle Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Deepshikha Upadhyay; Jamie Lucarelli; Alexandrea Arnold; Randy Flores; Hayley Bricker; Robert N Ulrich; Gregory Jesmok; Lauren Santi; William Defliese; Robert A Eagle; Hannah M Carroll; Jesse Bloom Bateman; Victoria Petryshyn; Sean J Loyd; Jianwu Tang; Antra Priyadarshi; Ben Elliott; Aradhna Tripati Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 2.586