Joshua L Hermsen1, Thomas M Burke2, Stephen P Seslar3, David S Owens4, Beth A Ripley5, Nahush A Mokadam6, Edward D Verrier6. 1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: hermsejl@uw.edu. 2. Thomas Burke PhD Consultant, LLC, Bothell, Wash. 3. Pediatric Heart Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Wash; Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 4. Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. 6. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Static 3-dimensional printing is used for operative planning in cases that involve difficult anatomy. An interactive 3D print allowing deliberate surgical practice would represent an advance. METHODS: Two patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had 3-dimensional prints constructed preoperatively. Stereolithography files were generated by segmentation of chest computed tomographic scans. Prints were made with hydrogel material, yielding tissue-like models that can be surgically manipulated. Septal myectomy of the print was performed preoperatively in the simulation laboratory. Volumetric measures of print and patient resected specimens were compared. An assessment tool was developed and used to rate the utility of this process. Clinical and echocardiographic data were reviewed. RESULTS: There was congruence between volumes of print and patient resection specimens (patient 1, 3.5 cm3 and 3.0 cm3, respectively; patient 2, 4.0 cm3 and 4.0 cm3, respectively). The prints were rated useful (3.5 and 3.6 on a 5-point Likert scale) for preoperative visualization, planning, and practice. Intraoperative echocardiographic assessment showed adequate relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (patient 1, 80 mm Hg to 18 mm Hg; patient 2, 96 mm Hg to 9 mm Hg). Both patients reported symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association functional class III to class I). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional printing of interactive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy heart models allows for patient-specific preoperative simulation. Resection volume relationships were congruous on both specimens and suggest evidence of construct validity. This model also holds educational promise for simulation of a low-volume, high-risk operation that is traditionally difficult to teach.
OBJECTIVE: Static 3-dimensional printing is used for operative planning in cases that involve difficult anatomy. An interactive 3D print allowing deliberate surgical practice would represent an advance. METHODS: Two patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had 3-dimensional prints constructed preoperatively. Stereolithography files were generated by segmentation of chest computed tomographic scans. Prints were made with hydrogel material, yielding tissue-like models that can be surgically manipulated. Septal myectomy of the print was performed preoperatively in the simulation laboratory. Volumetric measures of print and patient resected specimens were compared. An assessment tool was developed and used to rate the utility of this process. Clinical and echocardiographic data were reviewed. RESULTS: There was congruence between volumes of print and patient resection specimens (patient 1, 3.5 cm3 and 3.0 cm3, respectively; patient 2, 4.0 cm3 and 4.0 cm3, respectively). The prints were rated useful (3.5 and 3.6 on a 5-point Likert scale) for preoperative visualization, planning, and practice. Intraoperative echocardiographic assessment showed adequate relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (patient 1, 80 mm Hg to 18 mm Hg; patient 2, 96 mm Hg to 9 mm Hg). Both patients reported symptomatic improvement (New York Heart Association functional class III to class I). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional printing of interactive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy heart models allows for patient-specific preoperative simulation. Resection volume relationships were congruous on both specimens and suggest evidence of construct validity. This model also holds educational promise for simulation of a low-volume, high-risk operation that is traditionally difficult to teach.
Authors: Alessandra C Gasior; Carlos Reck; Victoria Lane; Richard J Wood; Jeremy Patterson; Robert Strouse; Simon Lin; Jennifer Cooper; D Gregory Bates; Marc A Levitt Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dimitris Mitsouras; Shi-Joon Yoo; Peter P Liu; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Frank J Rybicki Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Molly E Kupfer; Wei-Han Lin; Vasanth Ravikumar; Kaiyan Qiu; Lu Wang; Ling Gao; Didarul B Bhuiyan; Megan Lenz; Jeffrey Ai; Ryan R Mahutga; DeWayne Townsend; Jianyi Zhang; Michael C McAlpine; Elena G Tolkacheva; Brenda M Ogle Journal: Circ Res Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 17.367