| Literature DB >> 27649146 |
Hiraku Onishi1, Ayako Tokuyasu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The production of protein drugs has recently increased due to advances in biotechnology, but their clinical use is generally limited to parenteral administration due to low absorption in non-parenteral administration. Therefore, non-parenteral delivery systems allowing sufficient absorption draw much attention.Entities:
Keywords: Eudragit L100-coated microparticles; chitosan-4-thio-butylamidine conjugate microparticles; in vitro release; in vivo efficacy; oral drug delivery system; particle feature; salmon calcitonin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27649146 PMCID: PMC5037820 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091546
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Chemical structures of (a) trimethyl-chitosan (TMC); and (b) chitosan-4-thio-butylamidine conjugate (Ch-TBA).
Formulations and particle formation and characteristics of Ch-TBA-MP, Ch-TBA/TMC-MP, and Ch-MP.
| Preparation | Ch-TBA (mg) | TMC (mg) | Ch (mg) | sCT (µg) | Microparticle Formation | Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ch-TBA-MP | 80 | - | - | 480 | Formed | 698 ± 258 |
| Ch-TBA/TMC(4/1)-MP | 64 | 16 | - | 480 | Formed | 778 ± 352 |
| Ch-TBA/TMC(1/1)-MP | 40 | 40 | - | 480 | Not formed | - |
| Ch-TBA/TMC(1/4)-MP | 16 | 64 | - | 480 | Not formed | - |
| Ch-MP/Eud | - | - | 80 | 480 | Formed | 654 ± 312 |
MP: microparticles; Ch-TBA: chitosan-4-thio-butylamidine conjugate; TMC: trimethyl-chitosan; Ch: chitosan; sCT: salmon calcitonin.
Figure 2Scanning electron micrographs of (a) Ch-TBA-MP; (b) Ch-TBA/TMC-MP *; (c) Ch-TBA-MP/Eud; and (d) Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud *. * Ch-TBA/TMC(4/1)-MP were used. The length of the white bar = 5 µm. MP: microparticles.
Particle characteristics of Ch-TBA-MP/Eud, Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud, and Ch-MP/Eud.
| Preparation | sCT Concent (µg/mg) | Size (µm) |
|---|---|---|
| Ch-TBA-MP/Eud | 4.1 ± 1.2 | 1.51 ± 1.23 |
| Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud * | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 1.40 ± 1.60 |
| Ch-MP/Eud | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 1.35 ± 1.43 |
* Ch-TBA/TMC(4/1)-MP were used.
Figure 3Release profiles of (a) salmon calcitonin (sCT) from Ch-TBA-MP/Eud; (b) Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud *; and (c) Ch-TBA-MP/Eud. Each point represents the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) (n = 3). * Ch-TBA/TMC(4/1)-MP were used.
Figure 4Plasma Ca levels after the intragastric administration of each preparation to rats. The initial level, defined as the level immediately before administration, was set to 100%. Each point represents the mean ± standard error of mean (S.E.M.) (n = 3). *1 p < 0.05 vs. saline, sCT solution, Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud, Ch-MP/Eud; *2 p < 0.05 vs. saline, Ch-MP/Eud; *3 p < 0.05 vs. saline, sCT solution, Ch-TBA-MP/Eud, Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud, Ch-MP/Eud; *4 p < 0.05 vs. saline, sCT solution; # p < 0.05 vs. saline, sCT solution, im injection; & p < 0.05 vs. saline, sCT solution (Tukey’s test).
Efficacy parameters of Ch-TBA-MP/Eud, Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud and Ch-MP/Eud.
| Preparation | Dose (µg sCT eq./kg) | CR (% of the Initial Level) | TR (h) | AAC (% × h) | MRT (h) | RE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saline | - | 97.1 | 2 | −58 | 14.7 | −1.4 |
| sCT solution | 10 | 96.1 | 2 | −34 | 18.9 | −0.8 |
| Im injection | 1 | 63.3 | 4 | 424 | 7.4 | 100 |
| Ch-TBA-MP/Eud | 10 | 77.2 | 24 | 366 | 14.4 | 8.6 |
| Ch-TBA/TMC-MP/Eud * | 10 | 83.7 | 24 | 279 | 14.4 | 6.6 |
| Ch-MP/Eud | 10 | 87.3 | 24 | 215 | 14.6 | 5.1 |
Each parameter was obtained from the mean values shown in Figure 4. * Ch-TBA/TMC(4/1)-MP were used. TR: time required to reach the largest reduction in Ca level; CR: Ca level at TR; AAC: area between the initial Ca level (%) and above the curve of the plasma Ca level; MRT: mean time for a reduction in Ca level; RE: relative effectiveness, calculated by Equation (1). Im: intramuscular injection.