Literature DB >> 27647801

Content Analysis of Informed Consent for Whole Genome Sequencing Offered by Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.

Emilia Niemiec1,2,3, Pascal Borry4, Wim Pinxten5, Heidi Carmen Howard6.   

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) have become increasingly available in the research and clinical settings and are now also being offered by direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing (GT) companies. This offer can be perceived as amplifying the already identified concerns regarding adequacy of informed consent (IC) for both WES/WGS and the DTC GT context. We performed a qualitative content analysis of Websites of four companies offering WES/WGS DTC regarding the following elements of IC: pre-test counseling, benefits and risks, and incidental findings (IFs). The analysis revealed concerns, including the potential lack of pre-test counseling in three of the companies studied, missing relevant information in the risks and benefits sections, and potentially misleading information for consumers. Regarding IFs, only one company, which provides opportunistic screening, provides basic information about their management. In conclusion, some of the information (and related practices) present on the companies' Web pages salient to the consent process are not adequate in reference to recommendations for IC for WGS or WES in the clinical context. Requisite resources should be allocated to ensure that commercial companies are offering high-throughput sequencing under responsible conditions, including an adequate consent process.
© 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Keywords:  consumer genomics; direct-to-consumer genetic testing; informed consent; whole exome sequencing; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647801     DOI: 10.1002/humu.23122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  7 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use.

Authors:  Xuewei Chen; Heather Orom; Jennifer L Hay; Erika A Waters; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Opening Pandora's box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Ruth Horn; Michael Parker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Genetic Privacy and Data Protection: A Review of Chinese Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Services.

Authors:  Li Du; Meng Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Ethical Principles, Constraints and Opportunities in Clinical Proteomics.

Authors:  Sebastian Porsdam Mann; Peter V Treit; Philipp E Geyer; Gilbert S Omenn; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Lora J H Bean; Maren T Scheuner; Michael F Murray; Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green; Kristin G Monaghan; Glenn E Palomaki; Richard R Sharp; Tracy L Trotter; Michael S Watson; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Emilia Niemiec; Danya F Vears; Pascal Borry; Heidi Carmen Howard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.