Literature DB >> 27647720

Effects of different orthodontic retention protocols on the periodontal health of mandibular incisors.

W J Rody1, S Elmaraghy2, A M McNeight2, C A Chamberlain2, D Antal2, C Dolce2, T T Wheeler2, S P McGorray3, L M Shaddox4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the following two hypotheses: 1) different types of retainers result in distinct levels of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and 2) the retainer bonded to all mandibular anterior teeth induces more detrimental outcomes to the periodontium. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The Department of Orthodontics at the University of Florida. The population consisted of individuals in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled 36 individuals. Subjects in group 1 had retainers bonded to the mandibular canines only. Group 2 consisted of individuals having retainers bonded to all mandibular anterior teeth. Group 3 included patients using mandibular removable retainers. After clinical examination, GCF was collected from the mandibular incisor and biomarker levels were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Plaque accumulation and gingivitis differed significantly among groups, with the highest median values in group 2 subjects. Pairwise comparison of the groups with respect to gingivitis showed significant differences between groups 1 and 2. Significant differences among groups were detected for RANKL, OPG, OPN, M-CSF, MMP-3, and MMP-9. The ratio RANKL/OPG was significantly higher in group 2 subjects, with pairwise comparisons indicating that groups 1 and 2 differed from group 3.
CONCLUSION: An association was found between orthodontic retention groups and GCF biomarker levels, which should be further explored in longitudinal studies. The presence of retainers bonded to all anterior teeth seems to increase plaque accumulation and gingivitis.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; gingival crevicular fluid; orthodontic retainers; periodontal disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27647720     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

1.  Long-term effects of Class II orthodontic treatment on oral health.

Authors:  N C Bock; M Saffar; H Hudel; M Evälahti; K Heikinheimo; D P C Rice; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Retention Protocols and Factors Affecting Retainer Choice among Iraqi Orthodontists.

Authors:  Mushriq F Abid; Ali M Al-Attar; Akram F Alhuwaizi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-10-23

3.  Periodontal parameters of two types of 3 x 3 orthodontic retainer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Larissa A Ferreira; Diogo M Sapata; Maria G A Provenzano; Roberto M Hayacibara; Adilson L Ramos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-08-01

4.  Effect of gingival biotype on orthodontic treatment-inducedperiodontal complications: A systematic review.

Authors:  Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh; Anahita Moscowchi; Shiva Tavakol Davani; Milad Soleimani; Anahita Dehghani Soltani; Muna Al-Shuhayeb
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-14

5.  A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.

Authors:  Alvyda Andriekute; Arunas Vasiliauskas; Antanas Sidlauskas
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.