Paramjit K Sandhu1, Randy Elder2, Mona Patel2, Mona Saraiya3, Dawn M Holman3, Frank Perna4, Robert A Smith5, David Buller6, Craig Sinclair7, Anthony Reeder8, Jennifer Makin9, Bronwen McNoe8, Karen Glanz10. 1. Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: psandhu@cdc.gov. 2. Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia. 3. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Klein Buendel, Lakewood, Colorado. 7. Cancer Council Victoria, Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Victoria, Australia. 8. Cancer Society Social & Behavioral Research Unit, Department of Prevention & Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 9. University of Tasmania, Menzies Research Institute, Tasmania, Australia. 10. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine and School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Skin cancer is a preventable and commonly diagnosed cancer in the U.S. Excessive ultraviolet radiation exposure is a known cause of skin cancer. This article presents updated results of two types of interventions evaluated in a previously published Community Guide systematic review: multicomponent community-wide interventions and mass media interventions when used alone. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies assessing multicomponent community-wide and mass media interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure were evaluated using Community Guide systematic review methods. Relevant studies published between 1966 and 2013 were included and analyzed for this review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seven studies evaluating the effectiveness of multicomponent community-wide interventions showed a median increase in sunscreen use of 10.8 (interquartile interval=7.3, 23.2) percentage points, a small decrease in ultraviolet radiation exposure, a decrease in indoor tanning device use of 4.0 (95% CI=2.5, 5.5) percentage points, and mixed results for other protective behaviors. Four studies evaluating the effectiveness of mass media interventions found that they generally led to improved ultraviolet protection behaviors among children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence showed that multicomponent community-wide interventions are effective in reducing the deleterious effects of ultraviolet radiation exposure by increasing sunscreen use. There was, however, insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of mass media interventions alone in reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure and increasing ultraviolet protection behaviors, indicating a continuing need for more research in this field to improve assessment of effectiveness. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Skin cancer is a preventable and commonly diagnosed cancer in the U.S. Excessive ultraviolet radiation exposure is a known cause of skin cancer. This article presents updated results of two types of interventions evaluated in a previously published Community Guide systematic review: multicomponent community-wide interventions and mass media interventions when used alone. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies assessing multicomponent community-wide and mass media interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure were evaluated using Community Guide systematic review methods. Relevant studies published between 1966 and 2013 were included and analyzed for this review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seven studies evaluating the effectiveness of multicomponent community-wide interventions showed a median increase in sunscreen use of 10.8 (interquartile interval=7.3, 23.2) percentage points, a small decrease in ultraviolet radiation exposure, a decrease in indoor tanning device use of 4.0 (95% CI=2.5, 5.5) percentage points, and mixed results for other protective behaviors. Four studies evaluating the effectiveness of mass media interventions found that they generally led to improved ultraviolet protection behaviors among children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence showed that multicomponent community-wide interventions are effective in reducing the deleterious effects of ultraviolet radiation exposure by increasing sunscreen use. There was, however, insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of mass media interventions alone in reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure and increasing ultraviolet protection behaviors, indicating a continuing need for more research in this field to improve assessment of effectiveness. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: P A Briss; S Zaza; M Pappaioanou; J Fielding; L Wright-De Agüero; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; P D Mullen; R S Thompson; S H Woolf; V G Carande-Kulis; L Anderson; A R Hinman; D V McQueen; S M Teutsch; J R Harris Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: S Zaza; L K Wright-De Agüero; P A Briss; B I Truman; D P Hopkins; M H Hennessy; D M Sosin; L Anderson; V G Carande-Kulis; S M Teutsch; M Pappaioanou Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sara Gandini; Francesco Sera; Maria Sofia Cattaruzza; Paolo Pasquini; Roberto Zanetti; Cinzia Masini; Peter Boyle; Carmelo Francesco Melchi Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Mona Saraiya; Karen Glanz; Peter A Briss; Phyllis Nichols; Cornelia White; Debjani Das; S Jay Smith; Bernice Tannor; Angela B Hutchinson; Katherine M Wilson; Nisha Gandhi; Nancy C Lee; Barbara Rimer; Ralph C Coates; Jon F Kerner; Robert A Hiatt; Patricia Buffler; Phyllis Rochester Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Alan C Geller; Barbra A Dickerman; Jennifer M Taber; Laura A Dwyer; Anne M Hartman; Frank M Perna Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: A F Bais; R M Lucas; J F Bornman; C E Williamson; B Sulzberger; A T Austin; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; G Bernhard; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; S Madronich; R E Neale; S Yazar; A R Young; F R de Gruijl; M Norval; Y Takizawa; P W Barnes; T M Robson; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; S D Flint; P J Neale; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; D-P Häder; R C Worrest; R G Zepp; N D Paul; R M Cory; K R Solomon; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; H H Redhwi; A Torikai; A M Heikkilä Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 3.982