Aaron Reuben1, Terrie E Moffitt2,3,4,5, Avshalom Caspi2,3,4,5, Daniel W Belsky6,7, Honalee Harrington2, Felix Schroeder8, Sean Hogan9, Sandhya Ramrakha9, Richie Poulton9, Andrea Danese5,10. 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. aaron.reuben@duke.edu. 2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK. 6. Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 8. United States Army, Fort Bragg, NC, USA. 9. Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. 10. Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs; e.g. abuse, neglect, and parental loss) have been associated with increased risk for later-life disease and dysfunction using adults' retrospective self-reports of ACEs. Research should test whether associations between ACEs and health outcomes are the same for prospective and retrospective ACE measures. METHODS: We estimated agreement between ACEs prospectively recorded throughout childhood (by Study staff at Study member ages 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15) and retrospectively recalled in adulthood (by Study members when they reached age 38), in the population-representative Dunedin cohort (N = 1,037). We related both retrospective and prospective ACE measures to physical, mental, cognitive, and social health at midlife measured through both objective (e.g. biomarkers and neuropsychological tests) and subjective (e.g. self-reported) means. RESULTS: Dunedin and U.S. Centers for Disease Control ACE distributions were similar. Retrospective and prospective measures of adversity showed moderate agreement (r = .47, p < .001; weighted Kappa = .31, 95% CI: .27-.35). Both associated with all midlife outcomes. As compared to prospective ACEs, retrospective ACEs showed stronger associations with life outcomes that were subjectively assessed, and weaker associations with life outcomes that were objectively assessed. Recalled ACEs and poor subjective outcomes were correlated regardless of whether prospectively recorded ACEs were evident. Individuals who recalled more ACEs than had been prospectively recorded were more neurotic than average, and individuals who recalled fewer ACEs than recorded were more agreeable. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective ACE records confirm associations between childhood adversity and negative life outcomes found previously using retrospective ACE reports. However, more agreeable and neurotic dispositions may, respectively, bias retrospective ACE measures toward underestimating the impact of adversity on objectively measured life outcomes and overestimating the impact of adversity on self-reported outcomes. Associations between personality factors and the propensity to recall adversity were extremely modest and warrant further investigation. Risk predictions based on retrospective ACE reports should utilize objective outcome measures. Where objective outcome measurements are difficult to obtain, correction factors may be warranted.
BACKGROUND: Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs; e.g. abuse, neglect, and parental loss) have been associated with increased risk for later-life disease and dysfunction using adults' retrospective self-reports of ACEs. Research should test whether associations between ACEs and health outcomes are the same for prospective and retrospective ACE measures. METHODS: We estimated agreement between ACEs prospectively recorded throughout childhood (by Study staff at Study member ages 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15) and retrospectively recalled in adulthood (by Study members when they reached age 38), in the population-representative Dunedin cohort (N = 1,037). We related both retrospective and prospective ACE measures to physical, mental, cognitive, and social health at midlife measured through both objective (e.g. biomarkers and neuropsychological tests) and subjective (e.g. self-reported) means. RESULTS: Dunedin and U.S. Centers for Disease Control ACE distributions were similar. Retrospective and prospective measures of adversity showed moderate agreement (r = .47, p < .001; weighted Kappa = .31, 95% CI: .27-.35). Both associated with all midlife outcomes. As compared to prospective ACEs, retrospective ACEs showed stronger associations with life outcomes that were subjectively assessed, and weaker associations with life outcomes that were objectively assessed. Recalled ACEs and poor subjective outcomes were correlated regardless of whether prospectively recorded ACEs were evident. Individuals who recalled more ACEs than had been prospectively recorded were more neurotic than average, and individuals who recalled fewer ACEs than recorded were more agreeable. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective ACE records confirm associations between childhood adversity and negative life outcomes found previously using retrospective ACE reports. However, more agreeable and neurotic dispositions may, respectively, bias retrospective ACE measures toward underestimating the impact of adversity on objectively measured life outcomes and overestimating the impact of adversity on self-reported outcomes. Associations between personality factors and the propensity to recall adversity were extremely modest and warrant further investigation. Risk predictions based on retrospective ACE reports should utilize objective outcome measures. Where objective outcome measurements are difficult to obtain, correction factors may be warranted.
Authors: Kate M Scott; Michael Von Korff; Matthias C Angermeyer; Corina Benjet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Josep Maria Haro; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Johan Ormel; José Posada-Villa; Hisateru Tachimori; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-08
Authors: William S Weintraub; Stephen R Daniels; Lora E Burke; Barry A Franklin; David C Goff; Laura L Hayman; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Dilip K Pandey; Eduardo J Sanchez; Andrea Parsons Schram; Laurie P Whitsel Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S B Patten; T C R Wilkes; J V A Williams; D H Lavorato; N El-Guebaly; D Schopflocher; C Wild; I Colman; A G M Bulloch Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: Robert S Wilson; Kristin R Krueger; Steven E Arnold; Lisa L Barnes; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Julia L Bienias; David A Bennett Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: D P Bernstein; L Fink; L Handelsman; J Foote; M Lovejoy; K Wenzel; E Sapareto; J Ruggiero Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Markus Juonala; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Marko Elovainio; Christian Hakulinen; Costan G Magnussen; Matthew A Sabin; David P Burgner; David L Hare; Olli Hartiala; Heikki Ukkonen; Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Mika Kähönen; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Tomi Laitinen; Sakari Kainulainen; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: David Reiss; Lisbeth Nielsen; Keith Godfrey; Bruce McEwen; Christine Power; Teresa Seeman; Stephen Suomi Journal: Dev Psychol Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Thomas Bailey; Mario Alvarez-Jimenez; Ana M Garcia-Sanchez; Carol Hulbert; Emma Barlow; Sarah Bendall Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Elissa S Epel; Alexandra D Crosswell; Stefanie E Mayer; Aric A Prather; George M Slavich; Eli Puterman; Wendy Berry Mendes Journal: Front Neuroendocrinol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 8.606