Ying Chen1, Laura D Kubzansky2, Tyler J VanderWeele3. 1. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: yingchen@fas.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the longitudinal association between parental warmth and offspring flourishing in mid-life. We also considered associations between parental warmth and a number of mental health problems and adverse health behavioral outcomes. METHOD: Longitudinal data from the Midlife in the United States Study (N = 3,929, mean baseline age = 47.4 years) were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Parental warmth in childhood was recalled at phase I (1995-1996), while flourishing and other outcomes were self-reported at phase II (2004-2006). Following an approach developed by Keyes, flourishing was operationalized as a combined measure incorporating assessments of three aspects of well-being, including emotional, psychological, and social well-being. RESULTS: The results suggest that parental warmth was positively associated with the continuous score of flourishing (B = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.25). The association was not specific to any particular component (emotional, psychological, or social well-being) or subdomain of flourishing. Parental warmth was also inversely associated with several adverse health behavior outcomes such as drug use and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Parental warmth in childhood may help promote offspring functioning across multiple domains of well-being in mid-life. The findings help to strengthen the call for a public health focus on the importance of parenting for outcomes beyond childhood and well into adulthood, and suggest the value of targeting parenting practices for prevention and intervention strategies to improve population health and well-being.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the longitudinal association between parental warmth and offspring flourishing in mid-life. We also considered associations between parental warmth and a number of mental health problems and adverse health behavioral outcomes. METHOD: Longitudinal data from the Midlife in the United States Study (N = 3,929, mean baseline age = 47.4 years) were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Parental warmth in childhood was recalled at phase I (1995-1996), while flourishing and other outcomes were self-reported at phase II (2004-2006). Following an approach developed by Keyes, flourishing was operationalized as a combined measure incorporating assessments of three aspects of well-being, including emotional, psychological, and social well-being. RESULTS: The results suggest that parental warmth was positively associated with the continuous score of flourishing (B = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.18, 0.25). The association was not specific to any particular component (emotional, psychological, or social well-being) or subdomain of flourishing. Parental warmth was also inversely associated with several adverse health behavior outcomes such as drug use and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Parental warmth in childhood may help promote offspring functioning across multiple domains of well-being in mid-life. The findings help to strengthen the call for a public health focus on the importance of parenting for outcomes beyond childhood and well into adulthood, and suggest the value of targeting parenting practices for prevention and intervention strategies to improve population health and well-being.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Katie A McLaughlin; Jennifer Greif Green; Michael J Gruber; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ali Obaid Alhamzawi; Jordi Alonso; Matthias Angermeyer; Corina Benjet; Evelyn Bromet; Somnath Chatterji; Giovanni de Girolamo; Koen Demyttenaere; John Fayyad; Silvia Florescu; Gilad Gal; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Chi-Yi Hu; Elie G Karam; Norito Kawakami; Sing Lee; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Johan Ormel; José Posada-Villa; Rajesh Sagar; Adley Tsang; T Bedirhan Ustün; Svetlozar Vassilev; Maria Carmen Viana; David R Williams Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-06-29
Authors: Ronald W Manderscheid; Carol D Ryff; Elsie J Freeman; Lela R McKnight-Eily; Satvinder Dhingra; Tara W Strine Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Inge Axpe; Arantzazu Rodríguez-Fernández; Eider Goñi; Iratxe Antonio-Agirre Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maider Belintxon; Alfonso Osorio; Jokin de Irala; Marcia Van Riper; Charo Reparaz; Marta Vidaurreta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Patricia Louie; Laura Upenieks; Arjumand Siddiqi; David R Williams; David T Takeuchi Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 5.363