Literature DB >> 27646140

Evolution of Mutation Rates in Rapidly Adapting Asexual Populations.

Benjamin H Good1,2,3, Michael M Desai4,2,3.   

Abstract

Mutator and antimutator alleles often arise and spread in both natural microbial populations and laboratory evolution experiments. The evolutionary dynamics of these mutation rate modifiers are determined by indirect selection on linked beneficial and deleterious mutations. These indirect selection pressures have been the focus of much earlier theoretical and empirical work, but we still have a limited analytical understanding of how the interplay between hitchhiking and deleterious load influences the fates of modifier alleles. Our understanding is particularly limited when clonal interference is common, which is the regime of primary interest in laboratory microbial evolution experiments. Here, we calculate the fixation probability of a mutator or antimutator allele in a rapidly adapting asexual population, and we show how this quantity depends on the population size, the beneficial and deleterious mutation rates, and the strength of a typical driver mutation. In the absence of deleterious mutations, we find that clonal interference enhances the fixation probability of mutators, even as they provide a diminishing benefit to the overall rate of adaptation. When deleterious mutations are included, natural selection pushes the population toward a stable mutation rate that can be suboptimal for the adaptation of the population as a whole. The approach to this stable mutation rate is not necessarily monotonic: even in the absence of epistasis, selection can favor mutator and antimutator alleles that "overshoot" the stable mutation rate by substantial amounts.
Copyright © 2016 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  antimutator; deleterious load; hitchhiking; mutator

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646140      PMCID: PMC5105855          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.193565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  74 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of high mutation rates: adaptive evolution of bacteria in the mouse gut.

Authors:  A Giraud; I Matic; O Tenaillon; A Clara; M Radman; M Fons; F Taddei
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The approach to mutation-selection balance in an infinite asexual population, and the evolution of mutation rates.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  RNA virus evolution via a fitness-space model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-06-03       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Mutators and sex in bacteria: conflict between adaptive strategies.

Authors:  O Tenaillon; H Le Nagard; B Godelle; F Taddei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria.

Authors:  O Tenaillon; B Toupance; H Le Nagard; F Taddei; B Godelle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Mutator genes and selection for the mutation rate in bacteria.

Authors:  P R Painter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection.

Authors:  A Oliver; R Cantón; P Campo; F Baquero; J Blázquez
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D M Wloch; K Szafraniec; R H Borts; R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Effective models and the search for quantitative principles in microbial evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  Experimental evolution and the dynamics of adaptation and genome evolution in microbial populations.

Authors:  Richard E Lenski
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Culture Volume Influences the Dynamics of Adaptation under Long-Term Stationary Phase.

Authors:  Jonathan Gross; Sarit Avrani; Sophia Katz; Sabrin Hilau; Ruth Hershberg
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 4.  Emergence of evolutionary driving forces in pattern-forming microbial populations.

Authors:  Jona Kayser; Carl F Schreck; QinQin Yu; Matti Gralka; Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Variability in fitness effects can preclude selection of the fittest.

Authors:  Christopher J Graves; Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 13.915

Review 6.  Experimental Studies of Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbes.

Authors:  Ivana Cvijović; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Phenotypic and molecular evolution across 10,000 generations in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Shreyas Gopalakrishnan; Juhee Goyal; Megan E Dillingham; Christopher W Bakerlee; Parris T Humphrey; Tanush Jagdish; Elizabeth R Jerison; Katya Kosheleva; Katherine R Lawrence; Jiseon Min; Alief Moulana; Angela M Phillips; Julia C Piper; Ramya Purkanti; Artur Rego-Costa; Michael J McDonald; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Dynamics of Adaptation During Three Years of Evolution Under Long-Term Stationary Phase.

Authors:  Sophia Katz; Sarit Avrani; Meitar Yavneh; Sabrin Hilau; Jonathan Gross; Ruth Hershberg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Contribution of increased mutagenesis to the evolution of pollutants-degrading indigenous bacteria.

Authors:  Tanel Ilmjärv; Eve Naanuri; Maia Kivisaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sign of selection on mutation rate modifiers depends on population size.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Raynes; C Scott Wylie; Paul D Sniegowski; Daniel M Weinreich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.