Literature DB >> 27645397

Impella 5.0 as a Second-Line Mechanical Circulatory Support Strategy After Extracorporeal Life Support.

David Schibilsky1, Tobias Kruger1, Henning F Lausberg1, Christoph Eisenlohr1, Christoph Haller1, Attila Nemeth1, Barbara Schibilsky1, Helene Haeberle2, Peter Rosenberger2, Tobias Walker3, Christian Schlensak1.   

Abstract

The catheter-based Impella 5.0 left ventricular assist device is a powerful and less invasive alternative for patients in cardiogenic shock. The use as second-line therapy in patients with precedent extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has not been described before now. We analyzed our experience of consecutive patients treated with this alternative strategy. From April 2014 to December 2014, eight patients had been implanted as a second-line option after ECLS support. The reason for the change from ECLS to Impella 5.0 was absence of cardiac recovery for primary weaning and complications of ECLS therapy. The mean time of ECLS support prior to Impella implantation was 12 ± 7 days. The implantation of the Impella 5.0/CP was technically successful in all patients, and the ECLS could be explanted in all eight patients who received Impella implantation as a second-line treatment. The second-line Impella 5.0 therapy resulted in two patients who turned into left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates, two primary weaning candidates, and four patients who died in the setting of sepsis or absent cardiac recovery and contraindications for durable LVAD therapy. Thereby, the overall hospital discharge survival as well as the 180-day survival was 50% for Impella 5.0 implantations as second-line procedure after ECLS. The latest follow-up survival of this second-line strategy after ECLS was three out of eight, as one patient died after 299 days of LVAD support due to sepsis. The use of Impella 5.0 constitutes a possible second-line therapeutic option for those patients who do not show cardiac recovery during prolonged ECLS support or suffer from complications of ECLS therapy. This treatment allows additional time for decisions regarding cardiac recovery or indication for durable LVAD therapy.
© 2016 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mechanical circulatory support-Impella-Cardiogenic shock-Left ventricular assist device-Extracorporeal life support

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27645397     DOI: 10.1111/aor.12804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

1.  Impella 5.0® as bridge-to-recovery short-term mechanical circulatory support after LVAD explantation.

Authors:  Anja Osswald; Bastian Schmack; Ranny Goldwasser; Michael M Kreusser; Philip W Raake; Matthias Karck; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The tightrope walk between temporary and permanent mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  L Christian Napp; Maximilian Halbe; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Design and Development of a Miniaturized Percutaneously Deployable Wireless Left Ventricular Assist Device: Early Prototypes and Feasibility Testing.

Authors:  Brian Letzen; Jiheum Park; Zeynep Tuzun; Pramod Bonde
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support for refractory heart failure: the German Heart Center Berlin experience.

Authors:  Gaik Nersesian; Felix Hennig; Marcus Müller; Johanna Mulzer; Dmytro Tsyganenko; Christoph Starck; Tom Gromann; Volkmar Falk; Evgenij Potapov; Felix Schoenrath
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

5.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation evolution: Left ventricular unloading strategies.

Authors:  Alexander M Bernhardt; Benedikt Schrage; Dirk Westermann; Hermann Reichenspurner
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-27

6.  Current perspectives on mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Rene Schramm; Michiel Morshuis; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Boergermann; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Masatoshi Hata; Jan F Gummert
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.