Literature DB >> 27645213

Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates.

Carmela Rianna1, Manfred Radmacher2.   

Abstract

We used atomic force microscopy (AFM) technique to measure the viscoelastic response of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness polyacrylamide gels. After applying a step in contact we recorded the stress relaxation of cells in order to measure their viscous and elastic properties. With the help of an extended version of the Hertz model, we could quantify for the first time by AFM the elastic modulus and the dynamic viscosity of cells on substrates with different stiffnesses. We have cultured anaplastic carcinoma and normal thyroid cells on three different substrates: polyacrylamide gels with elastic modulus in a range of 3-5 and 30-40 kPa and "infinitely" stiff Petri dishes. Whereas normal thyroid cells adapted their mechanical properties to different stiffness substrates, cancer cells were less affected by the surrounding stiffness. Normal cells changed the elastic modulus from 1.2 to 1.6 and to 2.6 kPa with increasing substrate stiffness; the dynamic viscosity values varied from 230 to 515 and to 470 Pa·s, accordingly. By contrast, the values for cancer cells were rather constant regardless of substrate stiffness (in average the elastic modulus was 1.3 kPa and the dynamic viscosity was 300 Pa·s). This difference in sensing and reacting to the mechanical properties of the substrate shows that normal and cancer cells interact differently with the neighboring tissue, which may be related to the ability of cancer cells to form metastases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFM; Cancer cells; Polyacrylamide gels; Stress relaxation; Viscoelastic properties

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27645213     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-016-1168-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  60 in total

1.  Assessment of mechanical properties of adherent living cells by bead micromanipulation: comparison of magnetic twisting cytometry vs optical tweezers.

Authors:  Valérie M Laurent; Sylvie Hénon; Emmanuelle Planus; Redouane Fodil; Martial Balland; Daniel Isabey; François Gallet
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Foreword to the special issue on AFM in biology & bionanomedicine.

Authors:  Filip Braet; Manfred Radmacher
Journal:  Micron       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.251

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Q S Li; G Y H Lee; C N Ong; C T Lim
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Amphibian oocyte nuclei expressing lamin A with the progeria mutation E145K exhibit an increased elastic modulus.

Authors:  Anna Kaufmann; Fabian Heinemann; Manfred Radmacher; Reimer Stick
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 6.  General mechanisms of metastasis.

Authors:  E C Woodhouse; R F Chuaqui; L A Liotta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Studying the effects of matrix stiffness on cellular function using acrylamide-based hydrogels.

Authors:  Alexandra Cretu; Paola Castagnino; Richard Assoian
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  Molecular aspects of bladder cancer III. Prognostic markers of bladder cancer.

Authors:  I Kausch; A Böhle
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Stiffness gradients mimicking in vivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate.

Authors:  Justin R Tse; Adam J Engler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Isoform-specific contributions of alpha-actinin to glioma cell mechanobiology.

Authors:  Shamik Sen; Meimei Dong; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Biomimetic Materials for Studying Tumor and Immune Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Logan A Northcutt; Alejandra Suarez-Arnedo; Marjan Rafat
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Recent Advances in the Label-Free Characterization of Exosomes for Cancer Liquid Biopsy: From Scattering and Spectroscopy to Nanoindentation and Nanodevices.

Authors:  Riccardo Di Santo; Sabrina Romanò; Alberto Mazzini; Svetlana Jovanović; Giuseppina Nocca; Gaetano Campi; Massimiliano Papi; Marco De Spirito; Flavio Di Giacinto; Gabriele Ciasca
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.076

3.  Mechanosensitivity of Cancer Cells in Contact with Soft Substrates Using AFM.

Authors:  Yara Abidine; Andrei Constantinescu; Valérie M Laurent; Vinoth Sundar Rajan; Richard Michel; Valentin Laplaud; Alain Duperray; Claude Verdier
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Extracellular-Matrix-Anchored Click Motifs for Specific Tissue Targeting.

Authors:  Mary R Adams; Christopher T Moody; Jennifer L Sollinger; Yevgeny Brudno
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Robust scan synchronized force-fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Patrick Schmidt; John Lajoie; Sanjeevi Sivasankar
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Morphological adaptations in breast cancer cells as a function of prolonged passaging on compliant substrates.

Authors:  Sana Syed; Joseph Schober; Alexandra Blanco; Silviya Petrova Zustiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diabetes can change the viscoelastic properties of lymphocytes.

Authors:  N Parvanehpour; Shahrokh Shojaei; S Khorramymehr; V Goodarzi; F Hejazi; V Faghihi Rezaei
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2018-09-01

Review 8.  Solid stress, competition for space and cancer: The opposing roles of mechanical cell competition in tumour initiation and growth.

Authors:  Romain Levayer
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 15.707

9.  Viscoelasticity in simple indentation-cycle experiments: a computational study.

Authors:  Yu M Efremov; S L Kotova; P S Timashev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics.

Authors:  Johannes Rheinlaender; Andrea Dimitracopoulos; Bernhard Wallmeyer; Nils M Kronenberg; Kevin J Chalut; Malte C Gather; Timo Betz; Guillaume Charras; Kristian Franze
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 47.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.