Literature DB >> 2764458

Complications of reduction mammaplasty: comparison of nipple-areolar graft and pedicle.

D B Hawtof1, M Levine, D I Kapetansky, D Pieper.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of breast reductions in 268 patients by two plastic surgeons was performed. Particular attention was paid to those patients treated by inferior pedicle techniques; these patients were compared with those treated by free nipple grafts. According to our findings, patients with skin loss were heavier and had longer suprasternal notch-to-nipple distances. Patients who had free nipple grafts were older and heavier and had larger specimen weights and longer suprasternal notch-to-nipple distances. Fifty-four of the original 268 patients were included in a substudy of larger breasts, defined as those with a specimen weight of over 700 g. Nineteen patients underwent free nipple grafts, and 35 underwent inferior pedicle techniques. None of the 19 patients having free nipple grafts developed complications, whereas 6 of the 35 undergoing inferior pedicle techniques sustained significant complications. We conclude that free nipple grafts should be considered over inferior pedicles in heavier patients with breast ptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2764458     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198907000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Personal refinements in the single pedicle Skoog technique for reduction mammaplasty.

Authors:  S A Botta; R Rifai
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Subjective comparison of six different reduction mammoplasty procedures.

Authors:  L Hang-Fu
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Pedicle viability as the determinant factor for conversion to free nipple graft.

Authors:  Aa Al-Shaham
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2010

4.  Auto-Augmentation Mastopexy: Inferiorly Based Parenchymal Flap Technique and Evaluation of Outcomes Using BREAST-Q After 151 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Maximilian Zaussinger; Raphael Wenny; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Patient satisfaction with reduction mammaplasty: an early survey.

Authors:  L A Hughes; J L Mahoney
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  The Safety, Cosmetic Outcome, and Patient Satisfaction after Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty for Significant Macromastia.

Authors:  Muna M Baslaim; Shefaa Ahmed Al-Amoudi; Mohammed Hafiz; Wedyan Mohammed Al-Hazmi; Budoor Ahmed Salman; Mohammed Khalid Al-Amoudi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Virginal breast hypertrophy in a 14-year-old girl: A case report.

Authors:  Biraj Pokhrel; Sandesh Gautam; Samit Sharma; Nishan Babu Pokhrel; Naveen Chandra Bhatta; Sangam Rayamajhi; Jayan Man Shrestha
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-11-06

8.  Revisiting the No-vertical-scar, Free Nipple Graft Breast Reduction.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-16

9.  A versatile breast reduction technique: conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty.

Authors:  Eray Copcu
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-07-03

10.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Improved Nipple Survival in Large Volume Reduction Mammaplasty.

Authors:  Ricardo Engel; Yitzchok Greenberg; Aamir Siddiqui
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.326

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.