Maximilian Zaussinger1,2, Raphael Wenny3,4, Georg M Huemer5,6. 1. Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria. m.zaussinger@hotmail.com. 2. Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstr 69, 4040, Linz, Austria. m.zaussinger@hotmail.com. 3. Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria. 4. Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstr 69, 4040, Linz, Austria. 5. Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria. office@drhuemer.com. 6. Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstr 69, 4040, Linz, Austria. office@drhuemer.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mastopexy is one of the most performed annual plastic surgery procedures; hence, various techniques are described over the last decades. It varies from simple skin incisions to internally shaped pedicle designs. In this study, the authors present their modified auto-augmentation mastopexy technique and the resulting patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this retrospectively conducted study, 151 female patients were included. The average age was 40.6 years (range, 27-72 years). All patients underwent auto-augmentation mastopexy which is a combination of a superior pedicle for the nipple-areola complex and an inferiorly based soft-tissue flap which is shaped like an implant. Additionally, the BREAST-Q for Reduction/Mastopexy was used to analyze patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life after mastopexy. RESULTS: All breast corrections were successfully performed. General complication rate was 9%, and no major complication was observed. In two patients, local surgical revision due to hypertrophic scarring and nipple asymmetry was necessary. Analysed surveys of the BREAST-Q showed statistically significantly improved results. CONCLUSION: Depending on the breast-shape and the grade of ptosis, the selection of mastopexy technique is crucial. Our described mastopexy procedure is a safe and easily reproducible technique for almost all shapes of ptotic breasts which fulfill patient desires as well as aesthetic satisfaction and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
BACKGROUND: Mastopexy is one of the most performed annual plastic surgery procedures; hence, various techniques are described over the last decades. It varies from simple skin incisions to internally shaped pedicle designs. In this study, the authors present their modified auto-augmentation mastopexy technique and the resulting patient satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this retrospectively conducted study, 151 female patients were included. The average age was 40.6 years (range, 27-72 years). All patients underwent auto-augmentation mastopexy which is a combination of a superior pedicle for the nipple-areola complex and an inferiorly based soft-tissue flap which is shaped like an implant. Additionally, the BREAST-Q for Reduction/Mastopexy was used to analyze patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life after mastopexy. RESULTS: All breast corrections were successfully performed. General complication rate was 9%, and no major complication was observed. In two patients, local surgical revision due to hypertrophic scarring and nipple asymmetry was necessary. Analysed surveys of the BREAST-Q showed statistically significantly improved results. CONCLUSION: Depending on the breast-shape and the grade of ptosis, the selection of mastopexy technique is crucial. Our described mastopexy procedure is a safe and easily reproducible technique for almost all shapes of ptotic breasts which fulfill patient desires as well as aesthetic satisfaction and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.