Manabu Koike1, Yasutomo Yutoku, Aki Koike. 1. National Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
Abstract
Various chemotherapies and radiation therapies are useful for killing cancer cells mainly by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Uncovering the molecular mechanisms of DSB repair processes is crucial for developing next-generation radiotherapies and chemotherapeutics for human and animal cancers. XRCC4 plays a critical role in Ku-dependent nonhomologous DNA-end joining (NHEJ) in human cells, and is one of the core NHEJ factors. The localization of core NHEJ factors, such as human Ku70 and Ku80, might play a crucial role in regulating NHEJ activity. Recently, companion animals, such as canines, have been proposed to be a good model in many aspects of cancer research. However, the localization and regulation mechanisms of core NHEJ factors in canine cells have not been elucidated. Here, we show that the expression and subcellular localization of canine XRCC4 changes dynamically during the cell cycle. Furthermore, EYFP-canine XRCC4 accumulates quickly at laser-microirradiated DSB sites. The structure of a putative human XRCC4 nuclear localization signal (NLS) is highly conserved in canine, chimpanzee and mouse XRCC4. However, the amino acid residue corresponding to the human XRCC4 K210, thought to be important for nuclear localization, is not conserved in canine XRCC4. Our findings might be useful for the study of the molecular mechanisms of Ku-dependent NHEJ in canine cells and the development of new radiosensitizers that target XRCC4.
Various chemotherapies and radiation therapies are useful for killing cancer cells mainly by inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Uncovering the molecular mechanisms of DSB repair processes is crucial for developing next-generation radiotherapies and chemotherapeutics for human and animal cancers. XRCC4 plays a critical role in Ku-dependent nonhomologous DNA-end joining (NHEJ) in human cells, and is one of the core NHEJ factors. The localization of core NHEJ factors, such as humanKu70 and Ku80, might play a crucial role in regulating NHEJ activity. Recently, companion animals, such as canines, have been proposed to be a good model in many aspects of cancer research. However, the localization and regulation mechanisms of core NHEJ factors in canine cells have not been elucidated. Here, we show that the expression and subcellular localization of canineXRCC4 changes dynamically during the cell cycle. Furthermore, EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulates quickly at laser-microirradiated DSB sites. The structure of a putative humanXRCC4 nuclear localization signal (NLS) is highly conserved in canine, chimpanzee and mouseXRCC4. However, the amino acid residue corresponding to the humanXRCC4K210, thought to be important for nuclear localization, is not conserved in canineXRCC4. Our findings might be useful for the study of the molecular mechanisms of Ku-dependent NHEJ in canine cells and the development of new radiosensitizers that target XRCC4.
Resistance to radiation or chemotherapeutics is a common clinical problem when treating
people and pets with cancer. The lethal effect of photon radiation, such as X-ray, carbon ion
radiation and various chemotherapeutics, on cancer cells is primarily caused by DNA
double-strand breaks (DSBs). Nonhomologous DNA-end joining (NHEJ) is a major DSB repair
pathway in animal and human cells, and might repair most DSB produced by radiation and
chemotherapeutics in cancer and normal cells [4, 22]. Therefore, to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of
the DSB repair process, especially NHEJ, it is important to develop next-generation
radiotherapies and novel chemotherapeutics for animal and humancancer.NHEJ does not require an intact template and might be independent of the cell cycle [4, 22]. NHEJ starts
with the binding of Ku, which consists of Ku70 and Ku80, to DSB ends. The control mechanism
for subcellular localization and/or heterodimerization of Ku70 and Ku80 might play a key role
in regulating the physiological functions of Ku [11,
13]. NHEJ requires other core factors including
Artemis, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), DNA Ligase IV, XRCC4-like
factor (XLF; also called Cernunnos or NHEJ1) and X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 4
(XRCC4) [4, 22].
Recently, PAralog of XRCC4 and XLF (PAXX; also called C9orf142 or XLS) was suggested as a new
factor involved in NHEJ [2, 25, 31]. HumanKu70 and Ku80
accumulate at micro-laser-induced DSB sites following irradiation, and heterodimerization of
Ku70 and Ku80 might be essential for the recruitment of some core NHEJ factors including
DNA-PKcs, XLF and XRCC4 [12, 15, 22, 26]. However, dimerization of Ku70 and Ku80 is not required to recruit
another core NHEJ factor, Artemis, or the HR-related protein Rad52, to DSB sites [15, 17]. The
mechanism by which recruitment of core NHEJ factors to DSB sites occurs in canine cells has
not been clarified.The XRCC4/DNA Ligase IV complex is crucial for the final ligation of DSBs through NHEJ [22]. The XRCC4 homodimer stabilizes DNA Ligase IV by
binding to a single molecule [29]. It was
experimentally observed that absence of XRCC4 results in an impaired ability to repair DSB in
rodent cells making it an indispensable factor in NHEJ [7, 21, 22]. Recently, some groups have reported that missense and truncation mutations in
XRCC4 cause a human disease including primordial dwarfism [1, 3, 8, 24, 27, 28]. Expectedly,
XRCC4-defective patient fibroblasts showed radiosensitivity and diminished DSB repair
capacity.Companion animals, such as canines, are proposed to be a good cancer model for both
veterinary and human medical cancer research [10, 30]. The localization of a core NHEJ factor, such as XRCC4,
might play a critical role in regulating NHEJ. Thus, it is important to elucidate the
mechanism of XRCC4 accumulation at DSB sites. To our knowledge, there are currently no reports
on the localization of XRCC4 of companion animal species including the canine. Here, we
examined the expression and subcellular localization of canineXRCC4 in canine cells.
Additionally, we cloned XRCC4 cDNA from a beagle dog testis library and
examined whether canineXRCC4 accumulates at DNA damage sites quickly after
laser-microirradiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cloning of canineXRCC4: Oligonucleotide primers to amplify canineXRCC4 cDNA from male Beagle dog cDNA library (Biochain, Newark, CA,
U.S.A.) were designed based on the predicted XRCC4 genomic sequence of
female Boxer dog, Canis lupus familiaris (XM_546040.1).
EcoR1 and BamH1 restriction enzyme sites were appended
on the 5’ end of the sense and antisense primers, respectively. PCR amplification with sense
(5′-CGAATTCGATGGAGAGAAAAGTAAGCAGAA-3′) and antisense (5′-CGGATCCTTAAATCTCATCAAAGAGGTCTT-3′)
primers was carried out for 30 cycles in a Thermal Cycler PC-700 (ASTEC, Fukuoka, Japan)
using LA Taq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). After pre-denaturing (94°C for 5
min), each cycle consisted of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 56°C for 1 min
and extension at 72°C for 1 min, followed by a final extension (4 min). Other PCR primers
used in this study were as follows: F1: 5′-TTTCGGAGGAGGCCGGAAGT-3′, R1:
5′-ATCGGCTTCTTGGGAAATCT-3′, F2: 5′-GCGGATGCAAAAAAATCTTGGAAC-3′, and R2:
5′-GAAGATAGATAAGTAAATGGGACACGG-3′. The PCR product was subcloned into pCR4-TOPO vector
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.), and the nucleotide sequences was determined by
sequencing.Cell lines, cultures and transfections: A Madin-Darby canine kidney cell
line (MDCK) (HSRRB, Osaka, Japan), a human cervical carcinoma cell line (HeLa) (Riken Cell
Bank, Tsukuba, Japan), humancolon cancer cell line (HCT116) (Riken Cell Bank), a murine
embryonic fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 (Riken Cell Bank) and a murine lung epithelial cell
line (Ku70 +/− MLE) previously established [15] were
cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS).
XRCC4 cDNA from the pCR4-canineXRCC4 was subcloned into
the EcoRI and BamHI sites of pEYFP-C1 to produce the
in-frame fusion gene. pEYFP-canineXRCC4 or pEYFP-C1 was transiently
transfected in cells using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s
protocol. Cells were cultured for 2 days and then monitored under an FV300 confocal laser
scanning microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [12, 15, 16].Immunofluorescence staining: Immunofluorescence staining was conducted as
previously described [12, 14, 15] with the following
modifications. Briefly, the fixed cells were blocked using a blocking solution and then
incubated for 30 min at room temperature with mouse anti-γH2AX monoclonal antibody (JBW301)
(Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Charlottesville, VA, U.S.A.) or goat anti-XRCC4 polyclonal
antibody (C-20) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.). After washing with PBS,
detection of each protein was performed using Alexa fluor 488- or 568-conjugated secondary
antibodies (Molecular Probes, OR, U.S.A.).Immunoblotting: The extraction of total cell lysates and Western blot
analysis were conducted as described previously [14,
19] with the following modifications. The membranes
were blocked in Blocking One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) for 30 min. The following
antibodies were used: goat anti-XRCC4 polyclonal antibody (C-20), rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal
antibody (FL) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or mouse anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma,
St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). The anti-XRCC4 and anti-GFP antibodies, were diluted in Signal
Enhancer HIKARI (Nacalai Tesque). In accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, the
binding to each protein was detected using a Select Western blotting detection system (GE
Healthcare Bio-Sci. Corp.) and visualized using the ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad, Hercules,
CA, U.S.A.).Local DNA damage induction using laser and cell imaging: Local DNA damage
induction using laser and subsequent cell imaging was conducted as described previously
[12, 15,
17]. Briefly, local DSB were induced using a 5–30%
power scan (for 1 s) from a 405 nm laser. Images of living or fixed cells expressing
EYFP-canineXRCC4 proteins or EYFP alone were obtained using an FV300 confocal scanning
laser microscopy system (Olympus).
RESULTS
Expression and subcellular localization of canineXRCC4: We examined the
expression and subcellular localization of XRCC4 in canine cells. Originally, there have
been reports on the expression of XRCC4 in human and mouse cells [21]. First, we examined the expression of XRCC4 in the canine cell line
MDCK, the two human cell lines HeLa and HCT116, and the two mouse cell lines NIH3T3 and Ku70
+/− MLE by Western blotting using the anti-XRCC4 antibody. As shown in Fig. 1A, a signal of canineXRCC4 as well as human and mouseXRCC4 was detected. These
results demonstrate that XRCC4 is expressed in canine cells. In addition, our data showed
that the electrophoretic mobility of canineXRCC4 was different from that of human and mouseXRCC4, suggesting the possibility that the structure and/or post-translational modifications
of canineXRCC4 are different from those of human and/or mouseXRCC4. Next,
immunofluorescence analysis was performed in MDCK cells to examine the subcellular
localization of XRCC4 in canine cells (Fig. 1B and
1C). Indirect immunofluorescence staining using an anti-XRCC4 antibody showed that
fluorescence was weaker in mitotic cells than in interphase cells. During interphase,
fluorescence was detected in the nucleoplasm and was excluded from the nucleolus. During
mitosis, fluorescence was detected throughout the cytoplasm of MDCK cells, but not localized
to mitotic chromosomes. These results suggest that the expression and localization of canineXRCC4 change dynamically during the cell cycle.
Fig. 1.
Expression and subcellular localization of XRCC4 in canine cells. (A) Total cell
lysates from the canine cell line (MDCK), two human cell lines (HeLa and HCT116), and
two mouse cell lines (NIH3T3 and Ku70 +/− MLE) were analyzed by Western blotting using
an anti-XRCC4 antibody or an anti-β-actin antibody. (B, C) Subcellular localization of
XRCC4 in canine (MDCK) cells. The cells were fixed and stained with an anti-XRCC4
antibody. Nuclear DNA was counterstained with DAPI. The stained cells were analyzed by
confocal laser microscopy. Left panel, DAPI image; center panel, XRCC4 image; right
panel, merged image. Arrowheads indicate mitotic phase cells (B). The images shown are
a representative example for interphase cells or mitotic phase cells (C).
Expression and subcellular localization of XRCC4 in canine cells. (A) Total cell
lysates from the canine cell line (MDCK), two human cell lines (HeLa and HCT116), and
two mouse cell lines (NIH3T3 and Ku70 +/− MLE) were analyzed by Western blotting using
an anti-XRCC4 antibody or an anti-β-actin antibody. (B, C) Subcellular localization of
XRCC4 in canine (MDCK) cells. The cells were fixed and stained with an anti-XRCC4
antibody. Nuclear DNA was counterstained with DAPI. The stained cells were analyzed by
confocal laser microscopy. Left panel, DAPI image; center panel, XRCC4 image; right
panel, merged image. Arrowheads indicate mitotic phase cells (B). The images shown are
a representative example for interphase cells or mitotic phase cells (C).Sequence analysis of canineXRCC4: The canineXRCC4 cDNA
was cloned and sequenced from a beagle dog testis library. We isolated a 999-nucleotide
open-reading-frame encoding a protein of 332 amino acids (Fig. 2). The cDNA sequence obtained from the Beagle dog was identical to that predicted
sequence from a female Boxer dog genomic sequence (XM_546040.1). The obtained canine
sequence has been submitted to the DDBJ/ENA/NCBI database [accession number LC168634]. HumanXRCC4 was originally identified as a protein which consists of 334 amino acids [21]. As shown in Fig.
2, there is another splice variant form encoding humanXRCC4 isoform of 336 amino
acids (labeled H. sapiens-i). Comparative analysis of XRCC4 sequences showed that canineXRCC4 had 79.3%, 78.6%, 79.6% and 73.3% amino acid identity with human (H. sapiens:
AAC50339.1), human isoform (H. sapiens-i: NP_071801.1), chimpanzee (XP_001148110.2) and
mouse (NP_082288.1), respectively. Post-translational modifications of DNA repair proteins
including phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and SUMOylation, might play an important role in
the regulation of various DNA repair pathways. We found that the DNA-PK major
phosphorylation sites (S260, S318, S325 and S326) and a polyubiquitylation site (K296) of
humanXRCC4 [20, 32, 34] are evolutionarily conserved in
canine, chimpanzee and mouseXRCC4. It is reported that humanXRCC4 has a putative nuclear
localization signal (NLS) sequence, RKRRQR, at amino acid positions 270–275 [21]. We found that the putative NLS sequence is conserved
in canineXRCC4, as well as in chimpanzee and mouse. HumanXRCC4 is modified with the small
ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO at Lys210, and this SUMOylation is important for the nuclear
localization of XRCC4 [33]. Interestingly, the amino
acid sequence corresponding to the Lys210 in humanXRCC4 is not conserved in canineXRCC4
(Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequences of XRCC4 from canine (Canis lupus familiaris,
GenBank accession number: LC168634), human (Homo sapiens, GenBank
accession number: AAC50339.1), human isoform (H.sapience-i) (Homo
sapiens, GenBank accession number: NP_071801.1), chimpanzee (Pan
troglodytes, GenBank accession number: XP_001148110.2) and mouse
(Mus musculus, GenBank accession number: NP_082288.1) species. The
location of a putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence in human XRCC4
[21]. Stars mark the location of the SUMO
modification site (K210), polyubiquitylation site (K296) and DNA-PK phosphorylation
sites (S260, S318, S325 and S326) in the human sequences (AAC50339.1)) [20, 32,
34].
Amino acid sequences of XRCC4 from canine (Canis lupus familiaris,
GenBank accession number: LC168634), human (Homo sapiens, GenBank
accession number: AAC50339.1), human isoform (H.sapience-i) (Homo
sapiens, GenBank accession number: NP_071801.1), chimpanzee (Pan
troglodytes, GenBank accession number: XP_001148110.2) and mouse
(Mus musculus, GenBank accession number: NP_082288.1) species. The
location of a putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence in humanXRCC4
[21]. Stars mark the location of the SUMO
modification site (K210), polyubiquitylation site (K296) and DNA-PK phosphorylation
sites (S260, S318, S325 and S326) in the human sequences (AAC50339.1)) [20, 32,
34].EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulates quickly at laser-microirradiation-induced
DSBs: To further examine the expression and localization of XRCC4 in
living canine cells, we generated cells transiently expressing EYFP-canineXRCC4 in MDCK
cells. The expression vector pEYFP-C1 containing canineXRCC4 (pEYFP-canineXRCC4) was transfected into MDCK cells (Fig. 3A). Western blotting using anti-XRCC4 and anti-GFP antibodies showed that EYFP-canineXRCC4 was expressed in the transfectants (Fig.
3B). Confocal laser microscopy showed that EYFP-canineXRCC4 was localized to the
nuclei of living interphase cells in EYFP-canineXRCC4 transfectants (Fig. 3C). EYFP, used as a control, was distributed throughout the
cell excluding the nucleolus in EYFP transfectants (Fig.
3C).
Fig. 3.
Subcellular localization of EYFP-canine XRCC4 in living canine cells. (A) Schematics
of EYFP-canine XRCC4 chimeric protein and control protein (EYFP). (B) EYFP-canine
XRCC4 was expressed in canine (MDCK) cells, and the expression of EYFP-canine XRCC4
was examined by Western blotting using the anti-XRCC4, anti-GFP or anti-β-actin
antibody. (C) Imaging of living EYFP-canine XRCC4-transfected cells. Living MDCK cells
transiently expressing EYFP-canine XRCC4 or EYFP were analyzed by confocal laser
microscopy. EYFP images for the same cells are shown alone (left panel) or merged
(right panel) with differential interference contrast images (DIC) (center panel).
Subcellular localization of EYFP-canineXRCC4 in living canine cells. (A) Schematics
of EYFP-canineXRCC4 chimeric protein and control protein (EYFP). (B) EYFP-canineXRCC4 was expressed in canine (MDCK) cells, and the expression of EYFP-canineXRCC4
was examined by Western blotting using the anti-XRCC4, anti-GFP or anti-β-actin
antibody. (C) Imaging of living EYFP-canineXRCC4-transfected cells. Living MDCK cells
transiently expressing EYFP-canineXRCC4 or EYFP were analyzed by confocal laser
microscopy. EYFP images for the same cells are shown alone (left panel) or merged
(right panel) with differential interference contrast images (DIC) (center panel).We next examined whether EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulates quickly at 405 nm laser-induced DSB
sites in canine cells (Fig. 4A). EYFP-canineXRCC4, but not EYFP alone, accumulated at the microirradiated sites in
living MDCK cells (Fig. 4B). To determined whether
EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulated at 405 nm laser-induced DSB sites, we immunostained cells with
an antibody that detects γH2AX, a marker of DSBs. EYFP-canineXRCC4 colocalized with γH2AX
at microirradiated sites in MDCK cells (Fig. 4C).
To investigate the temporal dynamics of XRCC4 localization, we performed time-lapse imaging
of EYFP-canineXRCC4 transfected MDCK cells. We observed EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulation at
the microirradiated sites 5 sec after irradiation, and the intensity of the EYFP signal
increased quickly at the microirradiated sites (Fig.
4D). These results reveal that after irradiation, EYFP-canineXRCC4 quickly
accumulates and forms foci at laser-induced DSBs in living cells.
Fig. 4.
EYFP-canine XRCC4 accumulated quickly at DSBs induced by laser microirradiation. (A)
The localization and accumulation of EYFP-canine XRCC4 at DSBs induced by 405 nm laser
irradiation were examined. (B) Imaging of living EYFP-canine XRCC4-transfected MDCK
cells before (left panel) and after (right panel) microirradiation. Upper panel,
EYFP-canine XRCC4-transfected cells; Lower panel, EYFP-transfected cells. Arrowheads
indicate the microirradiated sites. (C) Immunostaining of microirradiated EYFP-canine
XRCC4-transfected cells with anti-γH2AX antibody. Cells were fixed and stained with
anti-γH2AX antibody at 5 min postirradiation. Left panel, EYFP-canine XRCC4; Center
panel, γH2AX image; Right panel, merged image. (D) Time-dependent EYFP-canine XRCC4
accumulation in living cells (5-120 s) after irradiation.
EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulated quickly at DSBs induced by laser microirradiation. (A)
The localization and accumulation of EYFP-canineXRCC4 at DSBs induced by 405 nm laser
irradiation were examined. (B) Imaging of living EYFP-canineXRCC4-transfected MDCK
cells before (left panel) and after (right panel) microirradiation. Upper panel,
EYFP-canineXRCC4-transfected cells; Lower panel, EYFP-transfected cells. Arrowheads
indicate the microirradiated sites. (C) Immunostaining of microirradiated EYFP-canineXRCC4-transfected cells with anti-γH2AX antibody. Cells were fixed and stained with
anti-γH2AX antibody at 5 min postirradiation. Left panel, EYFP-canineXRCC4; Center
panel, γH2AX image; Right panel, merged image. (D) Time-dependent EYFP-canineXRCC4
accumulation in living cells (5-120 s) after irradiation.
DISCUSSION
To develop next-generation chemoradiotherapies and chemotherapeutics for cancers is
important to understand the molecular mechanisms of DNA repair process including NHEJ. XRCC4
plays a critical role in the final ligation step of NHEJ at DSB [24]. The regulation of XRCC4 localizations might play a key role in
regulating NHEJ activity. However, there have been no reports on the expression and
localization of XRCC4 in canine cells. Here, we examined the expression and subcellular
localization of canineXRCC4. We found that the expression and localization of canineXRCC4
change dynamically during the cell cycle. CanineXRCC4 was cloned from a beagle dog testis
library, and sequence alignment indicated that the putative NLS sequence of humanXRCC4 is
conserved in canine, chimpanzee and mouseXRCC4. Transient expression of EYFP-tagged canineXRCC4 showed that canineXRCC4 was localized within the nucleus of interphase cells and
accumulated at laser-irradiated DSB sites in canineMDCK cells. These observations clarify
the regulation mechanism of XRCC4 localization and further our understanding of the
molecular mechanisms of Ku-dependent NHEJ in canine cells.HumanXRCC4 contains many post-translational modification sites. HumanXRCC4 is a nuclear
phosphoprotein that is phosphorylated by DNA-PK in response to radiation in
vivo [23, 34]. Recently, Zhang et al. (2016) reported that DNA-PK
phosphorylates XRCC4 at S325/S326, which promotes the binding of XRCC4 to FBXW7 [34]. SCFFBXW7 E3 ligase then promotes
polyubiquitylation of XRCC4 at K296 via K63 linkage for enhanced association with the
Ku70/Ku80 complex to facilitate NHEJ repair. Sequence alignments indicated that DNA-PK major
phosphorylation sites of humanXRCC4 (S260, S318, S325 and S326) and a polyubiquitylation
site (K296) are evolutionarily conserved in canine, chimpanzee and mouseXRCC4. However, the
equivalent of the humanXRCC4 residue K210, which is modified with SUMO, is not conserved in
canineXRCC4. We speculate that phosphorylation and ubiquitylation, but not SUMOylation,
post-translational modifications of canineXRCC4 play a critical role in the regulation of
canine NHEJ, although further studies need to confirm this. Further studies would clarify
the relative importance of different post-translational modifications in canine NHEJThe nuclear localization of humanXRCC4 is regulated by the XRCC4NLS (amino acids
270-275), SUMO modification at K210 and regulation by DNA Ligase IV [5, 21, 33]. Yurchenko et al. (2006) showed that SUMOylation at
K210 is necessary and sufficient for the nuclear localization of XRCC4 [33]. However, Fukuchi et al. (2015) have
recently reported that mutation of the SUMOylation site (K210) had no effect on the nuclear
localization of humanXRCC4 [6]. Additionally, they
indicated that the amino acid sequence surrounding K210 in humanXRCC4 is divergent even
among mammalian species, e.g., E. caballus and B. Taurus.
Here, we showed that canineXRCC4 is localized to the nuclei of interphase cells and that
localization of canineXRCC4 changes dynamically during the cell cycle. Additionally, we
showed that the structure of the putative humanXRCC4NLS is highly conserved in canineXRCC4. However, the amino acid sequence corresponding to the K210 of humanXRCC4 is not
conserved in canineXRCC4. While the role of the SUMOylation site (K210) of XRCC4 remains
controversial in human cells, we speculate that SUMOylation might not be important for the
nuclear localization of canineXRCC4. Altogether, we consider that the structure of a
putative XRCC4NLS might be vital for the nuclear localization of canineXRCC4.The veterinary/human medical collaboration has resulted in improved oncological outcomes
for both canine and human [30]. An attractive
approach to chemotherapy is the design of drugs that target core DNA repair factors
including NHEJ [9]. Additionally, NHEJ is an
attractive target for strategies aimed at increasing the sensitivity of tumors to anticancer
treatments including various radiotherapies. The regulation mechanism controlling the
localization of core NHEJ factors, including Ku, plays a critical role in controlling NHEJ
activity [11, 18]. Here, we demonstrated that EYFP-canineXRCC4 accumulation at micro-laser
induced DSBs began immediately after irradiation. This is a first report examining the
localization and accumulation of core NHEJ factors at DSB sites in living cells of companion
animal species, such as canine. Our findings provide the foundation for further studies to
develop drugs using XRCC4, and other core NHEJ factors, as target molecules in both canine
and human.
Authors: Chand Khanna; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; David Vail; Cheryl London; Philip Bergman; Lisa Barber; Matthew Breen; Barbara Kitchell; Elizabeth McNeil; Jaime F Modiano; Steven Niemi; Kenine E Comstock; Elaine Ostrander; Susan Westmoreland; Stephen Withrow Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Takashi Ochi; Andrew N Blackford; Julia Coates; Satpal Jhujh; Shahid Mehmood; Naoka Tamura; Jon Travers; Qian Wu; Viji M Draviam; Carol V Robinson; Tom L Blundell; Stephen P Jackson Journal: Science Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Y Gao; Y Sun; K M Frank; P Dikkes; Y Fujiwara; K J Seidl; J M Sekiguchi; G A Rathbun; W Swat; J Wang; R T Bronson; B A Malynn; M Bryans; C Zhu; J Chaudhuri; L Davidson; R Ferrini; T Stamato; S H Orkin; M E Greenberg; F W Alt Journal: Cell Date: 1998-12-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Christian Jekimovs; Emma Bolderson; Amila Suraweera; Mark Adams; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Derek J Richard Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 6.244