Literature DB >> 27643465

DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the validation of software programs performing biostatistical calculations for forensic genetics applications.

M D Coble1, J Buckleton2, J M Butler3, T Egeland4, R Fimmers5, P Gill6, L Gusmão7, B Guttman8, M Krawczak9, N Morling10, W Parson11, N Pinto12, P M Schneider13, S T Sherry14, S Willuweit15, M Prinz16.   

Abstract

The use of biostatistical software programs to assist in data interpretation and calculate likelihood ratios is essential to forensic geneticists and part of the daily case work flow for both kinship and DNA identification laboratories. Previous recommendations issued by the DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) covered the application of bio-statistical evaluations for STR typing results in identification and kinship cases, and this is now being expanded to provide best practices regarding validation and verification of the software required for these calculations. With larger multiplexes, more complex mixtures, and increasing requests for extended family testing, laboratories are relying more than ever on specific software solutions and sufficient validation, training and extensive documentation are of upmost importance. Here, we present recommendations for the minimum requirements to validate bio-statistical software to be used in forensic genetics. We distinguish between developmental validation and the responsibilities of the software developer or provider, and the internal validation studies to be performed by the end user. Recommendations for the software provider address, for example, the documentation of the underlying models used by the software, validation data expectations, version control, implementation and training support, as well as continuity and user notifications. For the internal validations the recommendations include: creating a validation plan, requirements for the range of samples to be tested, Standard Operating Procedure development, and internal laboratory training and education. To ensure that all laboratories have access to a wide range of samples for validation and training purposes the ISFG DNA commission encourages collaborative studies and public repositories of STR typing results. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Keywords:  Biostatistical software; Forensic genetics; Software training and testing; Software validation; Validation and verification

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27643465     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  8 in total

Review 1.  Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).

Authors:  Ruiyang Tao; Shouyu Wang; Jiashuo Zhang; Jingyi Zhang; Zihao Yang; Xiang Sheng; Yiping Hou; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.

Authors:  Mitchell M Holland; Teresa M Tiedge; Abigail J Bender; Sidney A Gaston-Sanchez; Jennifer A McElhoe
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Commentary: A "Source" of Error: Computer Code, Criminal Defendants, and the Constitution.

Authors:  Duncan A Taylor; Jo-Anne Bright; John Buckleton
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 4.  Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.

Authors:  John M Butler; Sheila Willis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.

Authors:  Michael S Adamowicz; Taylor N Rambo; Jennifer L Clarke
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.141

7.  Interpreting Mixture Profiles: Comparison between Precision ID GlobalFiler™ NGS STR Panel v2 and Traditional Methods.

Authors:  Michele Ragazzo; Stefania Carboni; Valerio Caputo; Carlotta Buttini; Laura Manzo; Valeria Errichiello; Giulio Puleri; Emiliano Giardina
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Interpretation of DNA data within the context of UK forensic science - evaluation.

Authors:  Roberto Puch-Solis; Susan Pope
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2021-09-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.