BACKGROUND: In borderline personality disorder (BPD), attentional bias (AB) to emotional stimuli may be a core component in disorder pathogenesis and maintenance. SAMPLING: 11 emotional Stroop task (EST) studies with 244 BPD patients, 255 nonpatients (NPs) and 95 clinical controls and 4 visual dot-probe task (VDPT) studies with 151 BPD patients or subjects with BPD features and 62 NPs were included. METHODS: We conducted two separate meta-analyses for AB in BPD. One meta-analysis focused on the EST for generally negative and BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words. The other meta-analysis concentrated on the VDPT for negative and positive facial stimuli. RESULTS: There is evidence for an AB towards generally negative emotional words compared to NPs (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.311) and to other psychiatric disorders (SMD = 0.374) in the EST studies. Regarding BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words, BPD patients reveal an even stronger AB than NPs (SMD = 0.454). The VDPT studies indicate a tendency towards an AB to positive facial stimuli but not negative stimuli in BPD patients compared to NPs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings rather reflect an AB in BPD to generally negative and BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words rather than an AB in BPD towards facial stimuli, and/or a biased allocation of covert attentional resources to negative emotional stimuli in BPD and not a bias in focus of visual attention. Further research regarding the role of childhood traumatization and comorbid anxiety disorders may improve the understanding of these underlying processes.
BACKGROUND: In borderline personality disorder (BPD), attentional bias (AB) to emotional stimuli may be a core component in disorder pathogenesis and maintenance. SAMPLING: 11 emotional Stroop task (EST) studies with 244 BPD patients, 255 nonpatients (NPs) and 95 clinical controls and 4 visual dot-probe task (VDPT) studies with 151 BPD patients or subjects with BPD features and 62 NPs were included. METHODS: We conducted two separate meta-analyses for AB in BPD. One meta-analysis focused on the EST for generally negative and BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words. The other meta-analysis concentrated on the VDPT for negative and positive facial stimuli. RESULTS: There is evidence for an AB towards generally negative emotional words compared to NPs (standardized mean difference, SMD = 0.311) and to other psychiatric disorders (SMD = 0.374) in the EST studies. Regarding BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words, BPD patients reveal an even stronger AB than NPs (SMD = 0.454). The VDPT studies indicate a tendency towards an AB to positive facial stimuli but not negative stimuli in BPD patients compared to NPs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings rather reflect an AB in BPD to generally negative and BPD-specific/personally relevant negative words rather than an AB in BPD towards facial stimuli, and/or a biased allocation of covert attentional resources to negative emotional stimuli in BPD and not a bias in focus of visual attention. Further research regarding the role of childhood traumatization and comorbid anxiety disorders may improve the understanding of these underlying processes.
Authors: Kathy R Berenson; Anett Gyurak; Ozlem Ayduk; Geraldine Downey; Matthew J Garner; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Daniel S Pine Journal: J Res Pers Date: 2009-12-01
Authors: M C Zanarini; F R Frankenburg; E D Dubo; A E Sickel; A Trikha; A Levin; V Reynolds Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Nelson H Donegan; Charles A Sanislow; Hilary P Blumberg; Robert K Fulbright; Cheryl Lacadie; Pawel Skudlarski; John C Gore; Ingrid R Olson; Thomas H McGlashan; Bruce E Wexler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-12-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Roberta Bortolla; Marco Cavicchioli; Marco Galli; Paul F M J Verschure; Cesare Maffei Journal: Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul Date: 2019-05-09
Authors: Linda van Zutphen; Nicolette Siep; Gitta A Jacob; Gregor Domes; Andreas Sprenger; Bastian Willenborg; Rainer Goebel; Oliver Tüscher; Arnoud Arntz Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.978