Literature DB >> 20499573

Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference: analysis by response modality and evaluation.

Yoshifumi Ikeda1, Shogo Hirata, Hideyuki Okuzumi, Mitsuru Kokubun.   

Abstract

Stroop interference (the Stroop effect) is the phenomenon observed when naming the color of an incongruent stimulus, such as the word "red" printed in blue ink; typically, this color incongruence causes slower naming compared to a neutral stimulus, such as a blue square patch. Reverse-Stroop interference occurs when reading the stimulus takes longer than reading the neutral stimulus. Features of Stroop and reverse-Stroop interference were examined, focusing on the difference between the response modalities--oral response and manual response--and the difference between methods of evaluating performance (time or correct responses) and the interference score. Participants were 47 students (30 women, 17 men; M age=20.8 yr., range=19-29). The results were as follows: (1) the performance of the reverse-Stroop condition was higher than that of the Stroop condition for both oral and manual responses; (2) the Stroop interference score was significantly greater with the oral response than with the manual response; and (3) the reverse-Stroop interference score was constant regardless of the response modality. The results were discussed with respect to differences in processing speeds of verbal and sensory information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499573     DOI: 10.2466/PMS.110.2.654-660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Mot Skills        ISSN: 0031-5125


  7 in total

1.  Preparation time modulates pro-active control and enhances task conflict in task switching.

Authors:  Eyal Kalanthroff; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Attentional Bias for Emotional Stimuli in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Deborah Kaiser; Gitta A Jacob; Gregor Domes; Arnoud Arntz
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.944

3.  An acute bout of localized resistance exercise can rapidly improve inhibitory control.

Authors:  Hayato Tsukamoto; Tadashi Suga; Saki Takenaka; Tatsuya Takeuchi; Daichi Tanaka; Takafumi Hamaoka; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of very low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation on post-exercise inhibitory control.

Authors:  Kento Dora; Tadashi Suga; Keigo Tomoo; Takeshi Sugimoto; Ernest Mok; Hayato Tsukamoto; Shingo Takada; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-18

5.  Similar improvements in cognitive inhibitory control following low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation and high-intensity resistance exercise in healthy young adults: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Kento Dora; Tadashi Suga; Keigo Tomoo; Takeshi Sugimoto; Ernest Mok; Hayato Tsukamoto; Shingo Takada; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Effect of repeated bouts versus a single bout of moderate-intensity exercise on postexercise inhibitory control.

Authors:  Takeshi Sugimoto; Tadashi Suga; Hayato Tsukamoto; Keigo Tomoo; Kento Dora; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08

7.  Work volume is an important variable in determining the degree of inhibitory control improvements following resistance exercise.

Authors:  Keigo Tomoo; Tadashi Suga; Takeshi Sugimoto; Daichi Tanaka; Kento Shimoho; Kento Dora; Ernest Mok; Shawn Matsumoto; Hayato Tsukamoto; Shingo Takada; Takeshi Hashimoto; Tadao Isaka
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.