| Literature DB >> 27642295 |
Ting Li3, Yuanyuan Ma2, Hong Zhang3, Ping Yan4, Lili Huo1, Yongyan Hu2, Xi Chen1, Ting Li3, Miao Zhang1, Zhaohui Liu1.
Abstract
Background. To determine the exact role of estrogen in vaginal tissue morphology and estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα) distribution in the vagina, which remains controversial. Methods. Sixty rats were randomly categorized: sham-operated (sham), ovariectomy (OVX), and four estradiol treatments (estradiol valerate at 0.4, 0.8, 1.6, and 3.2 mg/kg/day) for 2 weeks. Thereafter, vaginal samples were biopsied from the distal- and proximal-half portions. The percentage of ERα-immunoreactive cells and the ERα score were quantified using immunohistochemistry to assess changes in ERα expression and distribution. Results. OVX induced significant vaginal atrophy and organic index. Estrogen-replacement therapy (ERT) reversed vaginal atrophy. The vaginal distal-half areas showed lower ERα% than the proximal-half areas. The ERα% increased sharply 4 weeks after OVX, especially in the epithelial layer (P = 0.023). ERT elicited different degrees of reductions in tissues after the 2-week treatment, but the ERα% in only the epithelium recovered in parallel with that in the sham group (P = 0.001). The OVX group showed higher ERα histological scores than the sham group, and the distal-half area changed more evidently than the proximal-half area. ERα expression was nearly unchanged after ERT (P > 0.05). Conclusions. ERT is effective for treating obesity and vulvovaginal atrophy caused by hypoestrogenism and advancing age in menopausal women but cannot recover the distribution and expression of ERα.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27642295 PMCID: PMC5013240 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1093512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-8337 Impact factor: 3.257
Effects of estrogen on vaginal morphologic parameters (α = 0.05, two-tailed).
| Location | Sham | OVX | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight gain (g) | 39.10 ± 5.01 | 89.40 ± 9.25 | 74.80 ± 13.49 | 89.00 ± 6.19 | 68.60 ± 4.47 | 42.80 ± 8.14 | 6.926 | <0.001b |
| Length (cm) | 2.19 ± 0.06 | 2.38 ± 0.04 | 2.22 ± 0.07 | 2.33 ± 0.04 | 2.26 ± 0.06 | 2.15 ± 0.07 | 2.411 | 0.048a |
| Wet weight (g) | 0.25 ± 0.14 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 9.124 | <0.001b |
| Vaginal index (%) | 0.092 ± 0.006 | 0.047 ± 0.003 | 0.082 ± 0.007 | 0.078 ± 0.003 | 0.079 ± 0.004 | 0.085 ± 0.005 | 9.643 | <0.001b |
a P < 0.05 and b P < 0.001 (one-way analysis of variance).
Figure 1H&E immunostaining of vaginal tissue sections. (a)–(f) show H&E immunostaining of vaginal tissue sections from sham, OVX, E1, E2, E3, and E4 groups, respectively. The atrophic vaginal squamous epithelium in the OVX group is indicated by a red arrow in (b), exhibiting reduced epithelial stratification and cornification. Scale bar represents 50 μm (200x magnification). H&E, hematoxylin & eosin.
Figure 2ERα immunostaining of vaginal tissue sections. (a)–(f) show ERα immunostaining of vaginal tissue sections from sham, OVX, E1, E2, E3, and E4 groups, respectively. ERα-immunoreactive cells are indicated by small black arrows. The staining is primarily nuclear in the vaginal stratified squamous epithelium (basal, para-basal, and intermediate cell layers) and in the stromal fibroblasts or nonvascular smooth muscle cells in the lamina propria. Scale bar represents 50 μm (200x magnification). ERα, estrogen receptor-α.
Index of the percentage of vaginal ERα-immunoreactive cells according to location in sham rats (α = 0.05, two-tailed).
| Location | Subjects | Distal-half | Proximal-half |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epithelium | 10 | 6.70 ± 1.41 | 12.90 ± 5.60 | 1.214 | 0.256 |
| Lamina propria | 10 | 5.50 ± 2.17 | 16.70 ± 5.76 | 2.484 | 0.035a |
| Muscularis | 10 | 4.70 ± 2.13 | 18.50 ± 5.38 | 2.371 | 0.042a |
a P < 0.05 (paired sample t-test).
Index of the percentage of vaginal ERα-immunoreactive cells (ERα%) according to location in all groups (α = 0.05, two-tailed).
| Location | Subjects | Sham | OVX | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal-half | 10 | ||||||||
| Epithelium | 12.90 ± 5.60 | 45.00 ± 11.59 | 17.00 ± 5.18 | 13.20 ± 2.61 | 15.50 ± 3.29 | 10.80 ± 1.73 | 4.678 | 0.001b | |
| Lamina propria | 16.70 ± 5.76 | 33.70 ± 10.53 | 38.10 ± 7.37 | 27.50 ± 7.00 | 56.50 ± 8.89 | 32.00 ± 7.93 | 2.683 | 0.031a | |
| Muscularis | 18.50 ± 5.38 | 29.00 ± 7.22 | 30.50 ± 7.97 | 20.70 ± 5.82 | 54.50 ± 8.77 | 36.20 ± 7.67 | 3.223 | 0.013a | |
|
| |||||||||
| Distal-half | 10 | ||||||||
| Epithelium | 6.70 ± 1.42 | 33.50 ± 10.49 | 18.50 ± 3.73 | 19.90 ± 6.64 | 18.30 ± 6.42 | 15.00 ± 1.83 | 2.116 | 0.077 | |
| Lamina propria | 5.50 ± 2.18 | 25.00 ± 8.06 | 20.50 ± 8.06 | 37.50 ± 8.07 | 27.80 ± 7.89 | 12.50 ± 2.91 | 3.125 | 0.015a | |
| Muscularis | 4.70 ± 2.13 | 19.44 ± 9.07 | 10.70 ± 4.81 | 26.50 ± 7.71 | 33.50 ± 7.96 | 20.50 ± 4.50 | 2.698 | 0.030a | |
a P < 0.05 and b P < 0.001 (one-way analysis of variance).
Histological scores of ERα according to location in all groups (α = 0.05, two-tailed).
| Location | Sham | OVX | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximal-half | 2.30 ± 0.62 | 4.60 ± 0.28 | 4.40 ± 0.70 | 3.50 ± 0.50 | 5.60 ± 0.83 | 4.00 ± 0.84 | 10.720 | 0.057 |
| Distal-half | 4.70 ± 2.13 | 19.44 ± 9.07 | 10.70 ± 4.81 | 26.50 ± 7.71 | 33.50 ± 7.96 | 20.50 ± 4.50 | 9.231 | 0.1 |
| Whole | 3.30 ± 0.82 | 8.00 ± 1.28 | 7.40 ± 1.08 | 7.20 ± 1.12 | 9.30 ± 1.55 | 7.30 ± 0.87 | 13.033 | 0.023a |
a P < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 3Histological scores of ERα in the distal- and proximal-half areas. (a) presents the histological scores of ERα in the distal- and proximal-half areas in each group. (b) presents the histological scores of ERα in the whole vagina in each group. P = 0.039: ERα score in the whole vagina is significantly higher in the OVX group than in the sham group (Mann-Whitney U test).