BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for carcinoma of breast and thoracic structures involves inadvertent radiation to heart and coronary arteries (CA). Coronary artery stenosis in high radiation dose segments has been documented. Cardiac and respiratory motion induced displacement of CA and internal risk volume (IRV) margin remains inadequately quantified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty cases of carcinoma breast, lung and lung metastasis were enrolled in this study. ECG gated intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were performed in inspiratory breath hold (IBH) and expiratory breath hold (EBH). The images were segregated into inspiratory systole (IS), inspiratory diastole (ID), expiratory systole (ES) and expiratory diastole (ED) sets. Left anterior descending (LAD), limited segment of LAD close to chest wall (short LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), Left circumflex artery (LCX) and left ventricle (LV) were delineated in all four sets. Mean displacements in systole versus diastole and inspiration versus expiration were calculated in three co-ordinates [anterio-posterior (Z), left-right (X) and cranio-caudal (Y)]. RESULTS: Mean of displacement (mm) between systole and diastole (IS versus ID; and ES versus ED) in X, Y, Z co-ordinates were: LAD 3.0(±1.6), 2.8(±1.5), 3.6(±2.0); Short-LAD 3.0(±1.1), 0.8(±0.4), 2.4(±0.6); LV 2.4(±1.6), 1.7(±1), 5.0(±1.5); LCX 4.9(±1.6), 2.9(±1.3), 5.1(±1.9); RCA 6.6(±2.2), 3.6(±2.1), 5.9(±2.2). Mean displacement between inspiration and expiration (IS versus ES; and ID versus ED) in X, Y, Z axes were: LAD 3.3(±1.5), 8.0(±3.4), 3.8(±1.8); Short-LAD 2.7(±1), 12.2(±4.4), 3.3(±1.5); LV 2.9(±1.4), 9.8(±3.3), 4.7(±1.9); LCX 2.9(±.8), 9.7(±3.2), 6.2(±2.5); RCA 2.6(±1.3), 7.6(±2.5), 3.8(±1.7). CONCLUSION: Radial (RM), cranio-caudal margin (CC) of 7mm, 4mm in breath-hold radiotherapy whereas RM, CC of 7mm, 13mm respectively in free breath radiotherapy will cover the range of motions of CA, LV and can be recommended as IRV for these structures.
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for carcinoma of breast and thoracic structures involves inadvertent radiation to heart and coronary arteries (CA). Coronary artery stenosis in high radiation dose segments has been documented. Cardiac and respiratory motion induced displacement of CA and internal risk volume (IRV) margin remains inadequately quantified. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty cases of carcinoma breast, lung and lung metastasis were enrolled in this study. ECG gated intravenous contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans were performed in inspiratory breath hold (IBH) and expiratory breath hold (EBH). The images were segregated into inspiratory systole (IS), inspiratory diastole (ID), expiratory systole (ES) and expiratory diastole (ED) sets. Left anterior descending (LAD), limited segment of LAD close to chest wall (short LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), Left circumflex artery (LCX) and left ventricle (LV) were delineated in all four sets. Mean displacements in systole versus diastole and inspiration versus expiration were calculated in three co-ordinates [anterio-posterior (Z), left-right (X) and cranio-caudal (Y)]. RESULTS: Mean of displacement (mm) between systole and diastole (IS versus ID; and ES versus ED) in X, Y, Z co-ordinates were: LAD 3.0(±1.6), 2.8(±1.5), 3.6(±2.0); Short-LAD 3.0(±1.1), 0.8(±0.4), 2.4(±0.6); LV 2.4(±1.6), 1.7(±1), 5.0(±1.5); LCX 4.9(±1.6), 2.9(±1.3), 5.1(±1.9); RCA 6.6(±2.2), 3.6(±2.1), 5.9(±2.2). Mean displacement between inspiration and expiration (IS versus ES; and ID versus ED) in X, Y, Z axes were: LAD 3.3(±1.5), 8.0(±3.4), 3.8(±1.8); Short-LAD 2.7(±1), 12.2(±4.4), 3.3(±1.5); LV 2.9(±1.4), 9.8(±3.3), 4.7(±1.9); LCX 2.9(±.8), 9.7(±3.2), 6.2(±2.5); RCA 2.6(±1.3), 7.6(±2.5), 3.8(±1.7). CONCLUSION: Radial (RM), cranio-caudal margin (CC) of 7mm, 4mm in breath-hold radiotherapy whereas RM, CC of 7mm, 13mm respectively in free breath radiotherapy will cover the range of motions of CA, LV and can be recommended as IRV for these structures.
Authors: Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Ming Dong; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Carri K Glide-Hurst Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-12-29 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Sofia Meregalli; Anna DI Russo; Mario Levis; Patrizia Ciammella; Michela Buglione; Andrea Emanuele Guerini; Giuseppina De Marco; Vitaliana De Sanctis; Stefano Vagge; Umberto Ricardi; Gabriele Simontacchi Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Scott C Lester; Kekoa Taparra; Molly M Petersen; Ryan K Funk; Miran J Blanchard; Phillip M Young; Joerg Herrmann; Ashley E Hunzeker; Heather L Schultz; Cynthia McCollough; Alexandria M Tasson; Shuai Leng; James A Martenson; Amanda J Deisher; Thomas J Whitaker; Eric E Williamson; Nadia N Laack Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-11-26