Literature DB >> 27640874

Optimal sequential enrichment designs for phase II clinical trials.

Yong Zang1,2, Ying Yuan3.   

Abstract

In the early phase development of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), a commonly encountered situation is that the MTA is expected to be more effective for a certain biomarker subgroup, say marker-positive patients, but there is no adequate evidence to show that the MTA does not work for the other subgroup, that is, marker-negative patients. After establishing that marker-positive patients benefit from the treatment, it is often of great clinical interest to determine whether the treatment benefit extends to marker-negative patients. The authors propose optimal sequential enrichment (OSE) designs to address this practical issue in the context of phase II clinical trials. The OSE designs evaluate the treatment effect first in marker-positive patients and then in marker-negative patients if needed. The designs are optimal in the sense that they minimize the expected sample size or the maximum sample size under the null hypothesis that the MTA is futile. An efficient, accurate optimization algorithm is proposed to find the optimal design parameters. One important advantage of the OSE design is that the go/no-go interim decision rules are specified prior to the trial conduct, which makes the design particularly easy to use in practice. A simulation study shows that the OSE designs perform well and are ethically more desirable than the commonly used marker-stratified design. The OSE design is applied to an endometrial carcinoma trial.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecularly targeted agents; optimal design; personalized medicine; phase II trials; subgroups

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27640874      PMCID: PMC5138118          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  A D Barker; C C Sigman; G J Kelloff; N M Hylton; D A Berry; L J Esserman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures.

Authors:  Frank Bretz; Willi Maurer; Werner Brannath; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Optimal three-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  T T Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.

Authors:  Michael Hay; David W Thomas; John L Craighead; Celia Economides; Jesse Rosenthal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

Review 6.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Reports from the 2010 Clinical and Translational Cancer Research Think Tank meeting: design strategies for personalized therapy trials.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Roy S Herbst; Eric H Rubin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Clinical trial designs for predictive biomarker validation: theoretical considerations and practical challenges.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Optimal two-stage enrichment design correcting for biomarker misclassification.

Authors:  Yong Zang; Beibei Guo
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity.

Authors:  Lao H Saal; Peter Johansson; Karolina Holm; Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal; Qing-Bai She; Matthew Maurer; Susan Koujak; Adolfo A Ferrando; Per Malmström; Lorenzo Memeo; Jorma Isola; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Neal Rosen; Hanina Hibshoosh; Markus Ringnér; Ake Borg; Ramon Parsons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Spatial Two-stage Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 1.681

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.