Literature DB >> 27640142

The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Ümit Taşkın1, Timur Batmaz2, Mehmet Erdil3, Salih Aydın3, Kadir Yücebaş4.   

Abstract

The basic aim of our study is to compare the results of the conventional and piezoelectric osteotomy in rhinoplasty by complete subperiosteal degloving of nasal bone to minimize soft-tissue injury. The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomized, and controlled study. Setting is a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. Ninety patients who underwent primary open rhinoplasty with osteotomy, performed by either the conventional instruments or the piezoelectric device. The complete subperiosteal degloving of the entire nasal bone was done up to the nasal maxillary sulcus, medial canthus, and nasion in all patients, independent of the type of osteotomy device used. Patients subsequently underwent median-oblique and lateral osteotomy, either with an ultrasonic device or a conventional 2-mm guarded, straight osteotome. The postoperative edema and ecchymosis were evaluated by another surgeon who was blinded to the osteotomy procedure on postoperative days 2 and 7. The edema scores were significantly increased on the second day compared with the seventh day in both groups 1 and 2. However, there was no significant difference between groups. The ecchymosis scores were slightly higher in postoperative day 2, compared with day 7, in both groups 1 and 2, but statistically not significant. This study showed that the main reason edema and ecchymosis are seen post-rhinoplasty is related to soft-tissue injury during osteotomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecchymosis; Edema; Osteotomy; Rhinoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27640142     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4306-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Reverse nasal SMAS-perichondrium flap to avoid supratip deformity in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Emrah Arslan; Eyuphan Gencel; Oznur Pekedis
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  The Role of Piezoelectric Instrumentation in Rhinoplasty Surgery.

Authors:  Olivier Gerbault; Rollin K Daniel; Aaron M Kosins
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Efficacy of the combination of intraoperative cold saline-soaked gauze compression and corticosteroids on rhinoplasty morbidity.

Authors:  Umit Taskin; Ozgur Yigit; Suat Bilici; Samet Vasfi Kuvat; Ayse Sezim Sisman; Saban Celebi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Double lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  M L Parkes; F Kamer; W R Morgan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-06

5.  Steps for a safer method of osteotomies in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  J R Thomas; N R Griner; D J Remmler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  An aid to the treatment of supratip swelling after rhinoplasty.

Authors:  T D Rees
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Lateral nasal osteotomies: implications of bony thickness on fracture patterns.

Authors:  R J Harshbarger; P K Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  A new splint for the nasal tip.

Authors:  P Vega-Villasante; H Covarrubias
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  External osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  V Giacomarra; M Russolo; Z M Arnez; G Tirelli
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator.

Authors:  Edmund A Pribitkin; Leela S Lavasani; Carol Shindle; Jewel D Greywoode
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comments on: "The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty."

Authors:  Can Alper Cagici
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A comparison of piezosurgery with conventional techniques for internal osteotomy.

Authors:  I Koçak; R Doğan; O Gökler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Powered Micro-saw Versus Conventional Osteotome for Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Gözde Pamuk; A Erim Pamuk; Süheyla Kandemir
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Modalities of Post-Rhinoplasty Edema and Ecchymosis Measurement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marc Levin; Hedyeh Ziai; Michael Roskies
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 0.558

5.  [Comparison of piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty : A systematic review].

Authors:  M Wähmann; F Riedel; M Kovacevic; A Hopf; A E Albers
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Comparison of postoperative morbidity between piezoelectric surgery and conventional rotary instruments in mandibular third molar surgery: a split-mouth clinical study.

Authors:  Y Gulnahar; A-L Alpan
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2021-05-01

7.  Comparison of edema and ecchymosis in rhinoplasty candidates after lateral nasal osteotomy using piezosurgery and external osteotomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Ghavimi; Saeed Nezafati; Javad Yazdani; Tannaz Pourlak; Masoumeh Amini; Tala Pourlak; Arezu Ghoreishizadeh; Ramin Negahdari
Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

8.  Radix saw: a useful tool for rhinoplasty to correct high radix.

Authors:  Süreyya Şeneldir; Denizhan Dizdar; Altuğ Tuna
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.