Literature DB >> 20564664

Sonic rhinoplasty: sculpting the nasal dorsum with the ultrasonic bone aspirator.

Edmund A Pribitkin1, Leela S Lavasani, Carol Shindle, Jewel D Greywoode.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Rhinoplasty often requires precise, graded bone removal without damage to surrounding nasal soft tissue and mucosa. Unfortunately, current techniques are associated with decreased visualization, heat generation, mechanical chatter, and lack of surgical precision with resultant soft tissue injury. We introduce a novel technique to sculpt the nasal dorsum in a precise fashion with the ultrasonic bone aspirator and delineate its advantages over conventional techniques. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
METHODS: The SONOPET ultrasonic bone aspirator (Mutoh Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) utilizes ultrasonic waves to emulsify bone with concurrent irrigation and suction, enabling precise, graded bone removal under direct visualization without thermal or mechanical injury to the surrounding soft tissue or mucosa. We describe the application of this technology to dorsal hump reduction with early follow-up to 9 months. Successful reduction was determined by the senior author at postoperative follow-up appointments.
RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent open rhinoplasty requiring dorsal reduction with the ultrasonic bone aspirator. No individuals experienced delayed healing, infection, scarring, or major complications. Five of 60 patients had minor post surgical irregularities, which included visible nasal dorsum deformity, palpable nasal deformity, under-resection of the dorsum, and asymmetry of the nasal dorsum. No postoperative open sky deformities, inverted "V" deformities, over-resected dorsums, or skin injuries were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic bone aspiration permits safe, precise, graded bone removal without damaging surrounding nasal soft tissue and mucosa. We introduce novel applications of the ultrasonic bone aspirator in dorsal reduction that provide significant advantages over conventional techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564664     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of piezosurgery with conventional techniques for internal osteotomy.

Authors:  I Koçak; R Doğan; O Gökler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The comparison of edema and ecchymosis after piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ümit Taşkın; Timur Batmaz; Mehmet Erdil; Salih Aydın; Kadir Yücebaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  A Comparison Between Piezosurgery and Conventional Osteotomies in Rhinoplasty on Post-Operative Oedema and Ecchymosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Janneta Kisel; Manaf Khatib; Naveen Cavale
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Powered Micro-saw Versus Conventional Osteotome for Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Comparative Study.

Authors:  Gözde Pamuk; A Erim Pamuk; Süheyla Kandemir
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Novel Application of an Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator for Endoscopic Modified Medial Maxillectomy.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takakura; Hirohiko Tachino; Yutaro Oi; Tram Anh Do; Hideo Shojaku
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-01

6.  Endoscopic ultrasonic curette-assisted removal of frontal osteomas.

Authors:  A Bolzoni Villaret; A Schreiber; I Esposito; P Nicolai
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Endoscopic ultrasonic dacryocystorhinostomy: clinical profile and outcomes.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali; Manpreet Singh; Naja Chisty; Saurabh Kamal; Milind N Naik
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.