| Literature DB >> 27002117 |
Philippe Moreau1, Cyrille Hulin2, Margaret Macro3, Denis Caillot4, Carine Chaleteix5, Murielle Roussel6, Laurent Garderet7, Bruno Royer8, Sabine Brechignac9, Mourad Tiab10, Mathieu Puyade11, Martine Escoffre12, Anne-Marie Stoppa13, Thierry Facon14, Brigitte Pegourie15, Driss Chaoui16, Arnaud Jaccard17, Borhane Slama18, Gerald Marit2, Karim Laribi19, Pascal Godmer20, Odile Luycx21, Jean-Claude Eisenmann22, Olivier Allangba23, Mamoun Dib24, Carla Araujo25, Jean Fontan26, Karim Belhadj27, Marc Wetterwald28, Véronique Dorvaux29, Jean-Paul Fermand30, Philippe Rodon31, Brigitte Kolb32, Sylvie Glaisner33, Jean-Valere Malfuson34, Pascal Lenain35, Laetitia Biron1, Lucie Planche1, Helene Caillon1, Herve Avet-Loiseau6, Thomas Dejoie1, Michel Attal6.
Abstract
The Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome conducted a randomized trial to compare bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) with bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) as induction before high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, a total of 340 patients were centrally randomly assigned to receive VTD or VCD. After 4 cycles, on an intent-to-treat basis, 66.3% of the patients in the VTD arm achieved at least a very good partial response (primary end point) vs 56.2% in the VCD arm (P = .05). In addition, the overall response rate was significantly higher in the VTD arm (92.3% vs 83.4% in the VCD arm; P = .01). Hematologic toxicity was higher in the VCD arm, with significantly increased rates of grade 3 and 4 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. On the other hand, the rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN) was significantly higher in the VTD arm. With the exception of hematologic adverse events and PN, other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rare, with no significant differences between the VTD and VCD arms. Our data support the preferential use of VTD rather than VCD in preparation for ASCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01564537 and at EudraCT as #2013-003174-27.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27002117 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-693580
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113