Literature DB >> 2763880

Muscle strength, physical fitness, and weight but not age predict femoral neck bone mass.

N Pocock1, J Eisman, T Gwinn, P Sambrook, P Kelly, J Freund, M Yeates.   

Abstract

Hip fractures are the most serious complication of osteoporosis. Although low proximal femoral bone mineral density (BMD) does not cause hip fractures directly, it is clearly a prerequisite for the increased risk associated with aging. To investigate the mechanism of the age-related decline in proximal femoral bone mineral density, we have examined the relative importance of muscle strength, physical fitness, and body mass index (BMI) in addition to age in the determination of proximal femoral BMD in 73 healthy female volunteers age 20-75 years. Muscle strength was an independent predictor of BMD at all three sites in the proximal femur as well as in the lumbar spine and forearm; proximal femur BMD was also predicted by physical fitness. BMI was a positive predictor of bone mass at all sites. In the proximal femur, age was not an independent predictor of BMD at any site. In postmenopausal women muscle strength was a significant predictor of bone mass in the femur and forearm, but not in the spine. However, BMI remained predictive of bone mineral at all sites. Muscle strength, physical fitness, and weight appear to exert independent effects upon bone mass. Age effects may be mediated indirectly through associated changes in these factors. The integrated physical load on the skeleton may be a final common pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2763880     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  41 in total

1.  Relationships among body weight, joint moments generated during functional activities, and hip bone mass in older adults.

Authors:  Man-Ying Wang; Sean P Flanagan; Joo-Eun Song; Gail A Greendale; George J Salem
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Bone mineral measurements.

Authors:  T J Cole; A Prentice
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

3.  Assessment of anthropometric, systemic, and lifestyle factors influencing bone status in the legs of spinal cord injured individuals.

Authors:  P Eser; A Frotzler; Y Zehnder; H Schiessl; J Denoth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Loading and bone fragility.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Bone mass in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L D Hordon; V Wright; M A Smith
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Potential risk factors for development of postmenopausal osteoporosis--examined over a 12-year period.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; T W Meade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-24

8.  Peak bone mass and osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  J A Eisman; P J Kelly; N A Morrison; N A Pocock; R Yeoman; J Birmingham; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Muscle mass is more strongly related to hip bone mineral density than is quadriceps strength or lower activity level in adults over age 50 year.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; James C Torner; Mei Yang; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Felson; Michael C Nevitt
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.