K Badwan1, S Bhayani. 1. Division of Urology, Washington University Medical Centre, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pyeolplasty has become a minimally invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. Due to technical concerns with intracorporeal suturing, robotic pyeloplasty has become an emerging alternative. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for reports and outcomes on robotic pyeloplasty. RESULTS: Reports of robotic pyeloplasty are increasing, and outcomes appear excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pyeloplasty is feasible with excellent outcomes. Challenges remain in making the procedure cost effective. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pyeolplasty has become a minimally invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. Due to technical concerns with intracorporeal suturing, robotic pyeloplasty has become an emerging alternative. METHODS: The literature was reviewed for reports and outcomes on robotic pyeloplasty. RESULTS: Reports of robotic pyeloplasty are increasing, and outcomes appear excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pyeloplasty is feasible with excellent outcomes. Challenges remain in making the procedure cost effective. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.