Literature DB >> 27638131

Evaluation of the LABGEO PT10 Point-Of-Care Testing Device: Comparison of Analyte Measurements in Capillary Whole Blood and Lithium Heparin Whole Blood Samples With Those in Central Laboratory.

Jinsook Lim1, Hyunjin Kim1, Sun Hoe Koo1, Gye Cheol Kwon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care (POC) testing device has been widely used because of its rapid availability of results making diagnosis and management as early as possible. Capillary blood can reduce the difficulty of obtaining samples compared to venous blood and allows the prompt testing results. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of capillary blood in Samsung LABGEO PT10.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients and 18 healthy adults aged between 20 and 65 were enrolled and their capillary and venous blood samples were collected. Venous blood samples were split into lithium heparin (LiHep) tube and serum-separating tube. Measurements using capillary blood and LiHep whole blood were performed in LABGEO PT10. Serum was used for measurement by Toshiba 2000FR NEO in central laboratory.
RESULTS: In comparison between measurements in LABGEO PT10 using capillary and LiHep whole blood, the slope ranged between 0.9289 and 1.0471, correlation coefficients (R2 ) were over 0.95 except albumin, high-density lipoprotein, and total protein. Comparison of measurements in capillary and LiHep whole blood using LABGEO PT10 with those in the central laboratory revealed that the slope ranged between 0.6433 and 1.1364 for capillary whole blood and 0.6255 and 1.1602 for LiHep whole blood except alkaline phosphatase. For most of analytes, R2 were over 0.95.
CONCLUSION: Measurements in LABGEO PT10 using capillary blood was well correlated with those in LABGEO PT10 using LiHep whole blood and also with in the central laboratory. In conclusion, capillary blood provides reliable measurements and can be trustfully used in LABGEO PT10.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytic chemistry technique; POCT; capillary blood; point-of-care testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27638131      PMCID: PMC6817124          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Nova StatSensor creatinine meter and reagent strip technology for whole blood testing.

Authors:  Kareena L Schnabl; Sousan Bagherpoor; Pauline Diker; Christine Cursio; Jeffrey Dubois; Paul M Yip
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 2.  The Evidence to Support Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2010-08

3.  Comparison of three whole blood creatinine methods for estimation of glomerular filtration rate before radiographic contrast administration.

Authors:  Nichole L Korpi-Steiner; Eric E Williamson; Brad S Karon
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Liver function testing on the Abaxis Piccolo Xpress: Use in Ebola virus disease protocols.

Authors:  William E Owen; Justin E Caron; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care capillary whole blood prothrombin time and international normalized ratio: comparison to the Tcoag MDAII coagulation analyzer in the central laboratory.

Authors:  J A Peña; K B Lewandrowski; E L Lewandrowski; K Gregory; J M Baron; E M Van Cott
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Clinical utility of a fingerstick technology to identify individuals with abnormal blood lipids and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels.

Authors:  Parin Parikh; Heidi Mochari; Lori Mosca
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

7.  Comparison of POCT and central laboratory blood glucose results using arterial, capillary, and venous samples from MICU patients on a tight glycemic protocol.

Authors:  John R Petersen; Donna F Graves; Danyel H Tacker; Anthony O Okorodudu; Amin A Mohammad; Victor J Cardenas
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.786

8.  [Performance evaluation of the Piccolo xpress Point-of-care Chemistry Analyzer].

Authors:  Hyunwoong Park; Dae Hyun Ko; Jin Q Kim; Sang Hoon Song
Journal:  Korean J Lab Med       Date:  2009-10

9.  Assessment of liver function tests on Piccolo Xpress point of care chemistry analyzer in a pediatric hospital.

Authors:  Neval Akbas; Graciela Gonzalez; Rachel Edwards; Sridevi Devaraj
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2015-10-03

Review 10.  Primary care clinicians' attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Caroline H D Jones; Jeremy Howick; Nia W Roberts; Christopher P Price; Carl Heneghan; Annette Plüddemann; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.