Literature DB >> 27637859

Clustered double-strand breaks in heterochromatin perturb DNA repair after high linear energy transfer irradiation.

Yvonne Lorat1, Sara Timm1, Burkhard Jakob2, Gisela Taucher-Scholz2, Claudia E Rübe3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: High linear energy transfer (LET) radiotherapy offers superior dose conformity and biological effectiveness compared with low-LET radiotherapy, representing a promising alternative for radioresistant tumours. A prevailing hypothesis is that energy deposition along the high-LET particle trajectories induces DNA lesions that are more complex and clustered and therefore more challenging to repair. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying the differences in radiobiological effects between high-LET and low-LET radiotherapies remain unclear.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Human fibroblasts were irradiated with high-LET carbon ions or low-LET photons. At 0.5h and 5h post exposure, the DNA-damage pattern in the chromatin ultrastructure was visualised using gold-labelled DNA-repair factors. The induction and repair of single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks (DSBs), and clustered lesions were analysed in combination with terminal dUTP nick-end labelling of DNA breaks.
RESULTS: High-LET irradiation induced clustered lesions with multiple DSBs along ion trajectories predominantly in heterochromatic regions. The cluster size increased over time, suggesting inefficient DSB repair. Low-LET irradiation induced many isolated DSBs throughout the nucleus, most of which were efficiently rejoined.
CONCLUSIONS: The clustering of DSBs in heterochromatin following high-LET irradiation perturbs efficient DNA repair, leading to greater biological effectiveness of high-LET irradiation versus that of low-LET irradiation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-strand breaks (dsbs); High-LET irradiation; Ku-heterodimer; Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ); Single-strand breaks (ssbs); Transmission electron microscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637859     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  29 in total

Review 1.  Comparing Photon and Charged Particle Therapy Using DNA Damage Biomarkers.

Authors:  Shayoni Ray; Egle Cekanaviciute; Ivan Paulino Lima; Brita Singers Sørensen; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticle-Induced Neoplastic-Like Cell Transformation in Vitro Is Reduced with a Protective Amorphous Silica Coating.

Authors:  Tiffany G Kornberg; Todd A Stueckle; Jayme Coyle; Raymond Derk; Philip Demokritou; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying W Rojanasakul
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Nonhomologous End Joining Is More Important Than Proton Linear Energy Transfer in Dictating Cell Death.

Authors:  Scott J Bright; David B Flint; Sharmistha Chakraborty; Conor H McFadden; David S Yoon; Lawrence Bronk; Uwe Titt; Radhe Mohan; David R Grosshans; Pavel Sumazin; Simona F Shaitelman; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Gabriel O Sawakuchi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The relation between microdosimetry and induction of direct damage to DNA by alpha particles.

Authors:  Alejandro Bertolet; José Ramos-Méndez; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  3D-structured illumination microscopy reveals clustered DNA double-strand break formation in widespread γH2AX foci after high LET heavy-ion particle radiation.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Hagiwara; Atsuko Niimi; Mayu Isono; Motohiro Yamauchi; Takaaki Yasuhara; Siripan Limsirichaikul; Takahiro Oike; Hiro Sato; Kathryn D Held; Takashi Nakano; Atsushi Shibata
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-25

7.  Localization Microscopy Analyses of MRE11 Clusters in 3D-Conserved Cell Nuclei of Different Cell Lines.

Authors:  Marion Eryilmaz; Eberhard Schmitt; Matthias Krufczik; Franziska Theda; Jin-Ho Lee; Christoph Cremer; Felix Bestvater; Wladimir Schaufler; Michael Hausmann; Georg Hildenbrand
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Complex DNA Damage: A Route to Radiation-Induced Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Ifigeneia V Mavragani; Zacharenia Nikitaki; Maria P Souli; Asef Aziz; Somaira Nowsheen; Khaled Aziz; Emmy Rogakou; Alexandros G Georgakilas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Carcinogenesis Induced by Low-dose Radiation.

Authors:  Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Agnieszka Skrobała; Małgorzata Skórska; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Anna Kowalik; Weronika Jackowiak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  DNA damage in leukocytes after internal ex-vivo irradiation of blood with the α-emitter Ra-223.

Authors:  Sarah Schumann; Uta Eberlein; Razan Muhtadi; Michael Lassmann; Harry Scherthan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.