Literature DB >> 27637781

Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module.

Rachel L O'Connell1, Rosa DiMicco1, Komel Khabra2, Elizabeth A O'Flynn3, Nandita deSouza3, Nicola Roche1, Peter A Barry1, Anna M Kirby4, Jennifer E Rusby5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most recently developed module of the BREAST-Q, a validated patient outcome measure, is for patients who have undergone breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for cancer. This aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after BCT using BREAST-Q, investigate clinical risk factors for lower satisfaction and explore the relationship between patient satisfaction with the appearance of their breasts and the other domains of the BREAST-Q.
METHODS: Women who had undergone unilateral BCT in the preceding 1-6 years were invited to participate at the time of their annual surveillance mammogram. Clinicopathological data were collected from an electronic database. Linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between domains.
RESULTS: 200 women completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 60 years (SD 11.1). Time from surgery was 35.5 months (SD 17.8). Median score for 'Satisfaction with breasts' was 68 (interquartile range 55-80). Lowest scores were for 'sexual wellbeing' (57, IQR 45-66). On multivariate analysis, BMI at the time of surgery (p = 0.002), delayed wound healing (p = 0.001) and axillary surgery (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for lower satisfaction. There was significant correlation between 'Satisfaction with breasts' and all other BREAST-Q domains.
CONCLUSION: High BMI, delayed wound healing and axillary surgery are risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. This first publication reporting the whole dataset for the BREAST-Q BCT will serve as a benchmark for future studies of patient satisfaction following BCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BREAST-Q; Breast cancer; Breast-conserving therapy; Patient-reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637781     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3966-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  17 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures into Breast Surgical Oncology: Advancing Toward Value-Based Care.

Authors:  Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 2.  Oncoplastic partial breast reconstruction: concepts and techniques.

Authors:  Carrie K Chu; Summer E Hanson; Rosa F Hwang; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

3.  Breast cancer patient-reported outcomes on level 1 and level 2 oncoplastic procedures using BREAST-Q®.

Authors:  C A Pinto; B Peleteiro; C S Pinto; F Osório; S Costa; A Magalhães; H Mora; J Amaral; D Gonçalves; J L Fougo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.322

4.  Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conservation Surgery and Radiation for Multiple Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Data from the Alliance Z11102 Study.

Authors:  Kari M Rosenkranz; Karla Ballman; Linda McCall; Colleen McCarthy; Charlotte D Kubicky; Laurie Cuttino; Kelly K Hunt; Armando Giuliano; Kimberly J Van Zee; Bruce Haffty; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT).

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Rosa Di Micco; Komel Khabra; Lisa Wolf; Nandita deSouza; Nicola Roche; Peter A Barry; Anna M Kirby; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jenny Heiman Ullmark; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Komel Khabra; Jeffrey C Bamber; Nandita deSouza; Farid Meybodi; Peter A Barry; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Amy R Godden; Simon H Wood; Stuart E James; Fiona A MacNeill; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Rose; Henry Svensson; Jürgen Handler; Ute Hoyer; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Oncoplastic Surgery in Breast-Conserving Treatment: Patient Profile and Impact on Quality of Life.

Authors:  Idam de Oliveira-Junior; Igor de Araujo da Silva; Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva; Jonathas José da Silva; Almir José Sarri; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; René Aloisio da Costa Vieira
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.