Rachel L O'Connell1, Rosa DiMicco1, Komel Khabra2, Elizabeth A O'Flynn3, Nandita deSouza3, Nicola Roche1, Peter A Barry1, Anna M Kirby4, Jennifer E Rusby5. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Marsden Hospital, Orchard House, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. 2. Department of Statistics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. 3. Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. 4. Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK. 5. Department of Breast Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Marsden Hospital, Orchard House, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. jennifer.rusby@rmh.nhs.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The most recently developed module of the BREAST-Q, a validated patient outcome measure, is for patients who have undergone breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for cancer. This aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after BCT using BREAST-Q, investigate clinical risk factors for lower satisfaction and explore the relationship between patient satisfaction with the appearance of their breasts and the other domains of the BREAST-Q. METHODS: Women who had undergone unilateral BCT in the preceding 1-6 years were invited to participate at the time of their annual surveillance mammogram. Clinicopathological data were collected from an electronic database. Linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between domains. RESULTS: 200 women completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 60 years (SD 11.1). Time from surgery was 35.5 months (SD 17.8). Median score for 'Satisfaction with breasts' was 68 (interquartile range 55-80). Lowest scores were for 'sexual wellbeing' (57, IQR 45-66). On multivariate analysis, BMI at the time of surgery (p = 0.002), delayed wound healing (p = 0.001) and axillary surgery (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for lower satisfaction. There was significant correlation between 'Satisfaction with breasts' and all other BREAST-Q domains. CONCLUSION: High BMI, delayed wound healing and axillary surgery are risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. This first publication reporting the whole dataset for the BREAST-Q BCT will serve as a benchmark for future studies of patient satisfaction following BCT.
PURPOSE: The most recently developed module of the BREAST-Q, a validated patient outcome measure, is for patients who have undergone breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for cancer. This aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after BCT using BREAST-Q, investigate clinical risk factors for lower satisfaction and explore the relationship between patient satisfaction with the appearance of their breasts and the other domains of the BREAST-Q. METHODS: Women who had undergone unilateral BCT in the preceding 1-6 years were invited to participate at the time of their annual surveillance mammogram. Clinicopathological data were collected from an electronic database. Linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Spearman's rho correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between domains. RESULTS: 200 women completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 60 years (SD 11.1). Time from surgery was 35.5 months (SD 17.8). Median score for 'Satisfaction with breasts' was 68 (interquartile range 55-80). Lowest scores were for 'sexual wellbeing' (57, IQR 45-66). On multivariate analysis, BMI at the time of surgery (p = 0.002), delayed wound healing (p = 0.001) and axillary surgery (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for lower satisfaction. There was significant correlation between 'Satisfaction with breasts' and all other BREAST-Q domains. CONCLUSION: High BMI, delayed wound healing and axillary surgery are risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. This first publication reporting the whole dataset for the BREAST-Q BCT will serve as a benchmark for future studies of patient satisfaction following BCT.
Entities:
Keywords:
BREAST-Q; Breast cancer; Breast-conserving therapy; Patient-reported outcome measures
Authors: Mirelle Lagendijk; Elizabeth Mittendorf; Tari A King; Christopher Gibbons; Andrea Pusic; Laura S Dominici Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: C A Pinto; B Peleteiro; C S Pinto; F Osório; S Costa; A Magalhães; H Mora; J Amaral; D Gonçalves; J L Fougo Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-29 Impact factor: 4.322
Authors: Kari M Rosenkranz; Karla Ballman; Linda McCall; Colleen McCarthy; Charlotte D Kubicky; Laurie Cuttino; Kelly K Hunt; Armando Giuliano; Kimberly J Van Zee; Bruce Haffty; Judy C Boughey Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Rachel L O'Connell; Rosa Di Micco; Komel Khabra; Lisa Wolf; Nandita deSouza; Nicola Roche; Peter A Barry; Anna M Kirby; Jennifer E Rusby Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jenny Heiman Ullmark; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Rachel L O'Connell; Komel Khabra; Jeffrey C Bamber; Nandita deSouza; Farid Meybodi; Peter A Barry; Jennifer E Rusby Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Amy R Godden; Simon H Wood; Stuart E James; Fiona A MacNeill; Jennifer E Rusby Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-06-07 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Michael Rose; Henry Svensson; Jürgen Handler; Ute Hoyer; Anita Ringberg; Jonas Manjer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Idam de Oliveira-Junior; Igor de Araujo da Silva; Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva; Jonathas José da Silva; Almir José Sarri; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; René Aloisio da Costa Vieira Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 2.268