Literature DB >> 27637762

Estimation of spinopelvic muscles' volumes in young asymptomatic subjects: a quantitative analysis.

Celia Amabile1,2, Bertrand Moal3, Oussama Arous Chtara4, Helene Pillet4, Jose G Raya5, Antoine Iannessi6, Wafa Skalli7, Virginie Lafage3, Nicolas Bronsard8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Muscles have been proved to be a major component in postural regulation during pathological evolution or aging. Particularly, spinopelvic muscles are recruited for compensatory mechanisms such as pelvic retroversion, or knee flexion. Change in muscles' volume could, therefore, be a marker of greater postural degradation. Yet, it is difficult to interpret spinopelvic muscular degradation as there are few reported values for young asymptomatic adults to compare to. The objective was to provide such reference values on spinopelvic muscles. A model predicting the muscular volume from reduced set of MRI segmented images was investigated.
METHODS: A total of 23 asymptomatic subjects younger than 24 years old underwent an MRI acquisition from T12 to the knee. Spinopelvic muscles were segmented to obtain an accurate 3D reconstruction, allowing precise computation of muscle's volume. A model computing the volume of muscular groups from less than six MRI segmented slices was investigated.
RESULTS: Baseline values have been reported in tables. For all muscles, invariance was found for the shape factor [ratio of volume over (area times length): SD < 0.04] and volume ratio over total volume (SD < 1.2 %). A model computing the muscular volume from a combination of two to five slices has been evaluated. The five-slices model prediction error (in  % of the real volume from 3D reconstruction) ranged from 6 % (knee flexors and extensors and spine flexors) to 11 % (spine extensors).
CONCLUSION: Spinopelvic muscles' values for a reference population have been reported. A new model predicting the muscles' volumes from a reduced set of MRI slices is proposed. While this model still needs to be validated on other populations, the current study appears promising for clinical use to determine, quantitatively, the muscular degradation.

Keywords:  Asymptomatic subjects; MRI; Muscles; Volume; Young

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27637762     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-016-1742-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  35 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Measurement of body segment parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and three-dimensional geometry: an application in gait analysis.

Authors:  Mei Kay Lee; Ngoc Sang Le; Anthony C Fang; Michael T H Koh
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Paraspinal muscle morphology and composition: a 15-yr longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Maryse Fortin; Tapio Videman; Laura E Gibbons; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Substantial asymmetry in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area in healthy adults questions its value as a marker of low back pain and pathology.

Authors:  Riikka Niemeläinen; Marie-Michèle Briand; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Do variations in paraspinal muscle morphology and composition predict low back pain in men?

Authors:  M Fortin; L E Gibbons; T Videman; M C Battié
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Validation of a simplified method for muscle volume assessment.

Authors:  Falk Mersmann; Sebastian Bohm; Arno Schroll; Adamantios Arampatzis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effect of aging on human muscle architecture.

Authors:  M V Narici; C N Maganaris; N D Reeves; P Capodaglio
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-07-03

8.  Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Anton Rasch; Anders H Byström; Nils Dalen; Hans E Berg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls.

Authors:  Jae Chul Lee; Jang-Gyu Cha; Yongdai Kim; Yon-Il Kim; Byung-Joon Shin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Size and symmetry of trunk muscles in ballet dancers with and without low back pain.

Authors:  Jan E Gildea; Julie A Hides; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity : Prevalence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis.

Authors:  B G Diebo; N V Shah; S G Stroud; C B Paulino; F J Schwab; V Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Towards defining muscular regions of interest from axial magnetic resonance imaging with anatomical cross-reference: a scoping review of lateral hip musculature.

Authors:  Zuzana Perraton; Peter Lawrenson; Andrea B Mosler; James M Elliott; Kenneth A Weber; Natasha Ams Flack; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca J Crawford; Christopher Stewart; Adam I Semciw
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Manually defining regions of interest when quantifying paravertebral muscles fatty infiltration from axial magnetic resonance imaging: a proposed method for the lumbar spine with anatomical cross-reference.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca Abbott; James M Elliott
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Towards defining muscular regions of interest from axial magnetic resonance imaging with anatomical cross-reference: part II - cervical spine musculature.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Jon Cornwall; Ewan Kennedy; Rebecca Abbott; Rebecca J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Quantifying skeletal muscle volume and shape in humans using MRI: A systematic review of validity and reliability.

Authors:  Christelle Pons; Bhushan Borotikar; Marc Garetier; Valérie Burdin; Douraied Ben Salem; Mathieu Lempereur; Sylvain Brochard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.