Literature DB >> 21857168

Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance.

Rosanne M Kho1.   

Abstract

With an increasing adoption of robotics in gynecologic surgery, training and acquisition of robotic skills become pertinent. The learning curve for the acquisition of robotic skills has been studied using different assessment measurements in both the laboratory and surgical setting. In the laboratory setting, task acquisition and performance is superior with the robotic platform compared with conventional laparoscopy. The 3-dimensional viewing condition provides a perceptive advantage. Learning curve for robotics in the clinical setting is indirectly assessed. Conclusive statements regarding the learning curve comparing robotics with conventional laparoscopy in the surgical setting are difficult to make. To date, clinical studies are limited by lack of standard definitions and objective assessment measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857168     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b46f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  7 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Gulden Menderes; Lindsay Clark; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-30

2.  An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Eddib; N Jain; M Aalto; S Hughes; A Eswar; M Erk; C Michalik; V Krovi; P Singhal
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-02-27

Review 3.  Da Vinci© Skills Simulator™: is an early selection of talented console surgeons possible?

Authors:  Mark Meier; Kevin Horton; Hubert John
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-22

4.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper-tract urothelial cancer: A population-based assessment of costs and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Vincent Trudeau; Giorgio Gandaglia; Jonas Shiffmann; Ioana Popa; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication in an infant pig model.

Authors:  Alexandra Krauss; Thomas Neumuth; Robin Wachowiak; Bernd Donaubauer; Werner Korb; Oliver Burgert; Oliver J Muensterer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Robotic surgery basic skills training: Evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum.

Authors:  Kirsten Foell; Antonio Finelli; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Marcus Q Bernardini; Thomas K Waddell; Kenneth T Pace; R John D 'a Honey; Jason Y Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Association between Fellowship Training, Surgical Volume, and Laparoscopic Suturing Techniques among Members of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

Authors:  Emad Mikhail; Lauren Scott; Branko Miladinovic; Anthony N Imudia; Stuart Hart
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2016-01-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.