Literature DB >> 27637262

Current status of robotic colorectal surgery.

Jung Myun Kwak1, Seon Hahn Kim2.   

Abstract

To keep pace with the rapidly growing incidence of colorectal cancer, substantial progress has been made in colorectal cancer management in recent decades. Minimally invasive surgery is rapidly gaining acceptance for surgical management of colorectal cancer; however, laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically demanding and has a steep learning curve. Although many colorectal surgeons have great expectations of the robotic surgical system to overcome the pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery, the application of robots in colorectal cancer surgery seems to be delayed when compared with other surgical fields. However, in recent years, there has been an increasing number of reports on robotic colorectal surgery and much attention is given to it in the colorectal community. Most of the interest has been in robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. In contrast, the use of robotics for colon resections does not confer significant advantages. We summarize the current evidence on clinical and oncologic outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotics; Surgical robotics

Year:  2010        PMID: 27637262     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0217-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  56 in total

1.  Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; A Craig Lynch; Anthony J Senagore; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Guido Woeste; W O Bechstein; C Wullstein
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database.

Authors:  Sero Andonian; Zeph Okeke; Deidre A Okeke; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Brian A Vanderbrink; Lee Richstone; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Faek R Jamali; Asaad M Soweid; Hani Dimassi; Charles Bailey; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 5.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  R W Holloway; S D Patel; S Ahmad
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.360

6.  Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  P P Bianchi; C Ceriani; A Locatelli; G Spinoglio; M G Zampino; A Sonzogni; C Crosta; B Andreoni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients.

Authors:  S Delgado; D Momblán; L Salvador; R Bravo; A Castells; A Ibarzabal; J M Piqué; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system.

Authors:  Lester S Borden; Paul M Kozlowski; Christopher R Porter; John M Corman
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.344

View more
  3 in total

1.  Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hecker; Martin Reichert; Markus Hirschburger; Rolf Schneider; Sophie Kraenzlein; Winfried Padberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  A novel flexible hyper-redundant surgical robot: prototype evaluation using a single incision flexible access pelvic application as a clinical exemplar.

Authors:  James Clark; David P Noonan; Valentina Vitiello; Mikael H Sodergren; Jianzhong Shang; Christopher J Payne; Thomas P Cundy; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotic vs. TaTME Rectal Surgery (ROTA STUDY) Matched Cohort Trial for Mid to Low Rectal Cancer Surgery Evaluation Trial in the Hands of an Experienced Surgeon.

Authors:  Ravish Jootun; Pedja Cuk; Mark Ellebæk; Per Vadgaard Andersen; Søren Salomon; Gunnar Baatrup; Issam Al-Najami; Jim Khan
Journal:  Int J Surg Protoc       Date:  2022-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.