INTRODUCTION: The flexible endoscope is increasingly being considered as a surgical tool to enable innovative natural orifice or flexible access techniques. These experiences have exposed unique advantages but also significant challenges. Major current technical drawbacks in this setting relate to uncontrolled flexibility, inaccurate sustained target localization, unreliable navigation and overall platform instability. In striving to address existing technical limitations, this paper introduces a novel flexible hyper-redundant surgical robot and evaluates its clinical potential using a focused clinical application. METHOD: To assess utility of the device within tight confines of the human pelvis or peritoneal cavity, detailed laboratory workspace analysis experiments were undertaken using a computer-simulated model that incorporated anatomical data obtained via pelvic magnetic resonance images of eight women. Ten participants executed ninety usability and reliability trials on an ex vivo simulator, before the robot was repeatedly trialled in an in vivo porcine model. RESULTS: The robot demonstrated capability of targeting >90 % of the anatomic region of interest. All 90 user trials were successfully performed without interruption or malfunction. Significant improvements in performance, time and motion were observed between first and last sets of trials (p = 0.001). In vivo feasibility testing affirmed robustness of the device when deployed within the physiological demands of a live scale appropriate model. CONCLUSION: Technologically advanced flexible operative platforms are needed to fulfil aspirations for an introductory era of flexible access surgery. This prototype is proposed as a potential future platform for robot-assisted flexible endoscopic surgery. Encouraging pre-clinical feasibility results are demonstrated for diagnostic and therapeutic applications within the pelvis.
INTRODUCTION: The flexible endoscope is increasingly being considered as a surgical tool to enable innovative natural orifice or flexible access techniques. These experiences have exposed unique advantages but also significant challenges. Major current technical drawbacks in this setting relate to uncontrolled flexibility, inaccurate sustained target localization, unreliable navigation and overall platform instability. In striving to address existing technical limitations, this paper introduces a novel flexible hyper-redundant surgical robot and evaluates its clinical potential using a focused clinical application. METHOD: To assess utility of the device within tight confines of the human pelvis or peritoneal cavity, detailed laboratory workspace analysis experiments were undertaken using a computer-simulated model that incorporated anatomical data obtained via pelvic magnetic resonance images of eight women. Ten participants executed ninety usability and reliability trials on an ex vivo simulator, before the robot was repeatedly trialled in an in vivo porcine model. RESULTS: The robot demonstrated capability of targeting >90 % of the anatomic region of interest. All 90 user trials were successfully performed without interruption or malfunction. Significant improvements in performance, time and motion were observed between first and last sets of trials (p = 0.001). In vivo feasibility testing affirmed robustness of the device when deployed within the physiological demands of a live scale appropriate model. CONCLUSION: Technologically advanced flexible operative platforms are needed to fulfil aspirations for an introductory era of flexible access surgery. This prototype is proposed as a potential future platform for robot-assisted flexible endoscopic surgery. Encouraging pre-clinical feasibility results are demonstrated for diagnostic and therapeutic applications within the pelvis.
Authors: James Clark; Felipe Orihuela-Espina; Mikael Sodergren; David Rc James; Vahe Karimyan; Julian Teare; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 2.442
Authors: Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Mohammed E Allaf; Ioannis Varkarakis; Takeshi Inagaki; Craig Rogers; Li-Ming Su; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: James Clark; Daniel Richard Leff; Mikael Sodergren; Richard Newton; David Noonan; Robert Goldin; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 14-20 Impact factor: 79.321