Cynthia A Burns1, M Ann Lambros2, Hal H Atkinson3, Greg Russell4, Michael T Fitch5. 1. a Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Endocrinology & Metabolism , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 2. b Department of Economics , Wake Forest University , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 3. c Department of Internal Medicine Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 4. d Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA. 5. e Department of Emergency Medicine , Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem , NC , USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Professionalism is a core physician competency and identifying students at risk for poor professional development early in their careers may allow for mentoring. This study identified indicators in the preclinical years associated with later professionalism concerns. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of observable indicators in the preclinical and clinical years was conducted using two classes of students (n = 226). Relationships between five potential indicators of poor professionalism in the preclinical years and observations related to professional concerns in the clinical years were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three medical students were identified with at least one preclinical indicator and one professionalism concern during the clinical years. Two observable preclinical indicators were significantly correlated with unprofessional conduct during the clinical years: Three or more absences from attendance-required sessions (odds ratio 4.47; p=.006) and negative peer assessment (odds ratio 3.35; p=.049). CONCLUSIONS: We identified two significant observable preclinical indicators associated with later professionalism concerns: excessive absences and negative peer assessments. Early recognition of students at risk for future professionalism struggles would provide an opportunity for proactive professional development prior to the clinical years, when students' permanent records may be affected. Peer assessment, coupled with attention to frequent absences, may be a method to provide early recognition.
PURPOSE: Professionalism is a core physician competency and identifying students at risk for poor professional development early in their careers may allow for mentoring. This study identified indicators in the preclinical years associated with later professionalism concerns. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of observable indicators in the preclinical and clinical years was conducted using two classes of students (n = 226). Relationships between five potential indicators of poor professionalism in the preclinical years and observations related to professional concerns in the clinical years were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three medical students were identified with at least one preclinical indicator and one professionalism concern during the clinical years. Two observable preclinical indicators were significantly correlated with unprofessional conduct during the clinical years: Three or more absences from attendance-required sessions (odds ratio 4.47; p=.006) and negative peer assessment (odds ratio 3.35; p=.049). CONCLUSIONS: We identified two significant observable preclinical indicators associated with later professionalism concerns: excessive absences and negative peer assessments. Early recognition of students at risk for future professionalism struggles would provide an opportunity for proactive professional development prior to the clinical years, when students' permanent records may be affected. Peer assessment, coupled with attention to frequent absences, may be a method to provide early recognition.
Authors: Tahir Jameel; Mukhtiar Baig; Zohair J Gazzaz; Jawad M Tashkandi; Nasser S Al Alhareth; Shahida A Khan; Nadeem S Butt Journal: Cureus Date: 2019-06-14
Authors: Marianne Mak-van der Vossen; Arianne Teherani; Walther N K A van Mook; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi A Kusurkar Journal: Med Educ Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Sanne Schreurs; Kitty B Cleutjens; Arno M M Muijtjens; Jennifer Cleland; Mirjam G A Oude Egbrink Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 2.463