Jacquelien Noordhoek1, Vincent Gulmans, Kors van der Ent, Jeffrey M Beekman. 1. aDutch Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Baarn bDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre cRegenerative Medicine Centre Utrecht, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New therapeutics have been introduced for cystic fibrosis that modulate cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function in a mutation-specific fashion. Despite CFTR genotype-based stratification of treatments, treatment efficacy is variable between study participants suggesting that individual factors further contribute to drug efficacy. Moreover, these treatments are licensed for a limited amount of CFTR mutations, and study participants with rare mutations that can potentially benefit from available treatments may be missed. New approaches that better support the identification of responders to CFTR modulators are, therefore, needed. RECENT FINDINGS: We, here, review how a patient-oriented research collaboration between basic and clinical scientists and a national cystic fibrosis patient organization led to the development of a CFTR-dependent assay using primary stem cell cultures termed intestinal organoids that can measure the individual efficacy of CFTR modulators in a preclinical laboratory setting. Early observations suggest that drug responses in organoids reflect drug responses in vivo. SUMMARY: We particularly focus on the importance of patient-oriented research collaborations, and how such a collaboration helped to develop a personalized medicine approach for CFTR modulators. Intestinal organoids and biobanks thereof may be used to select optimal, individually tailored treatments for current and future (combinations of) CFTR modulators with only limited patient discomfort.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: New therapeutics have been introduced for cystic fibrosis that modulate cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function in a mutation-specific fashion. Despite CFTR genotype-based stratification of treatments, treatment efficacy is variable between study participants suggesting that individual factors further contribute to drug efficacy. Moreover, these treatments are licensed for a limited amount of CFTR mutations, and study participants with rare mutations that can potentially benefit from available treatments may be missed. New approaches that better support the identification of responders to CFTR modulators are, therefore, needed. RECENT FINDINGS: We, here, review how a patient-oriented research collaboration between basic and clinical scientists and a national cystic fibrosispatient organization led to the development of a CFTR-dependent assay using primary stem cell cultures termed intestinal organoids that can measure the individual efficacy of CFTR modulators in a preclinical laboratory setting. Early observations suggest that drug responses in organoids reflect drug responses in vivo. SUMMARY: We particularly focus on the importance of patient-oriented research collaborations, and how such a collaboration helped to develop a personalized medicine approach for CFTR modulators. Intestinal organoids and biobanks thereof may be used to select optimal, individually tailored treatments for current and future (combinations of) CFTR modulators with only limited patient discomfort.
Authors: Jennifer Barrila; Aurélie Crabbé; Jiseon Yang; Karla Franco; Seth D Nydam; Rebecca J Forsyth; Richard R Davis; Sandhya Gangaraju; C Mark Ott; Carolyn B Coyne; Mina J Bissell; Cheryl A Nickerson Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Jennifer S Guimbellot; Justin M Leach; Imron G Chaudhry; Nancy L Quinney; Susan E Boyles; Michael Chua; Inmaculada Aban; Ilona Jaspers; Martina Gentzsch Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-11-16
Authors: Dylan J Richards; Yang Li; Charles M Kerr; Jenny Yao; Gyda C Beeson; Robert C Coyle; Xun Chen; Jia Jia; Brooke Damon; Robert Wilson; E Starr Hazard; Gary Hardiman; Donald R Menick; Craig C Beeson; Hai Yao; Tong Ye; Ying Mei Journal: Nat Biomed Eng Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 25.671
Authors: Justin D Anderson; Zhongyu Liu; L Victoria Odom; Latona Kersh; Jennifer S Guimbellot Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.011
Authors: Yu-Hwai Tsai; Michael Czerwinski; Angeline Wu; Michael K Dame; Durga Attili; Evan Hill; Justin A Colacino; Lauren Marie Nowacki; Noah F Shroyer; Peter D R Higgins; John Y Kao; Jason R Spence Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-05-30
Authors: Norman Sachs; Angelos Papaspyropoulos; Domenique D Zomer-van Ommen; Inha Heo; Lena Böttinger; Dymph Klay; Fleur Weeber; Guizela Huelsz-Prince; Nino Iakobachvili; Gimano D Amatngalim; Joep de Ligt; Arne van Hoeck; Natalie Proost; Marco C Viveen; Anna Lyubimova; Luc Teeven; Sepideh Derakhshan; Jeroen Korving; Harry Begthel; Johanna F Dekkers; Kuldeep Kumawat; Emilio Ramos; Matthijs Fm van Oosterhout; G Johan Offerhaus; Dominique J Wiener; Eduardo P Olimpio; Krijn K Dijkstra; Egbert F Smit; Maarten van der Linden; Sridevi Jaksani; Marieke van de Ven; Jos Jonkers; Anne C Rios; Emile E Voest; Coline Hm van Moorsel; Cornelis K van der Ent; Edwin Cuppen; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Frank E Coenjaerts; Linde Meyaard; Louis J Bont; Peter J Peters; Sander J Tans; Jeroen S van Zon; Sylvia F Boj; Robert G Vries; Jeffrey M Beekman; Hans Clevers Journal: EMBO J Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 11.598