Literature DB >> 27634915

Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.

Liliang Ouyang1, Rui Yao, Yu Zhao, Wei Sun.   

Abstract

3D cell printing is an emerging technology for fabricating complex cell-laden constructs with precise and pre-designed geometry, structure and composition to overcome the limitations of 2D cell culture and conventional tissue engineering scaffold technology. This technology enables spatial manipulation of cells and biomaterials, also referred to as 'bioink', and thus allows study of cellular interactions in a 3D microenvironment and/or in the formation of functional tissues and organs. Recently, many efforts have been made to develop new bioinks and to apply more cell sources for better biocompatibility and biofunctionality. However, the influences of printing parameters on the shape fidelity of 3D constructs as well as on cell viability after the cell printing process have been poorly characterized. Furthermore, parameter optimization based on a specific cell type might not be suitable for other types of cells, especially cells with high sensibility. In this study, we systematically studied the influence of bioink properties and printing parameters on bioink printability and embryonic stem cell (ESC) viability in the process of extrusion-based cell printing, also known as bioplotting. A novel method was established to determine suitable conditions for bioplotting ESCs to achieve both good printability and high cell viability. The rheological properties of gelatin/alginate bioinks were evaluated to determine the gelation properties under different bioink compositions, printing temperatures and holding times. The bioink printability was characterized by a newly developed semi-quantitative method. The results demonstrated that bioinks with longer gelation times would result in poorer printability. The live/dead assay showed that ESC viability increased with higher printing temperatures and lower gelatin concentrations. Furthermore, an exponential relationship was obtained between ESC viability and induced shear stress. By defining the proper printability and acceptable viability ranges, a combined parameters region was obtained. This study provides guidance for parameter optimization and the fine-tuning of 3D cell printing processes regarding both bioink printability and cell viability after bioplotting, especially for easily damaged cells, like ESCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27634915     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  88 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.

Authors:  James B Hu; Martin L Tomov; Jan W Buikema; Caressa Chen; Morteza Mahmoudi; Sean M Wu; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 2.  The Role of the Microenvironment in Controlling the Fate of Bioprinted Stem Cells.

Authors:  Lauren N West-Livingston; Jihoon Park; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Efficient myotube formation in 3D bioprinted tissue construct by biochemical and topographical cues.

Authors:  WonJin Kim; Hyeongjin Lee; JiUn Lee; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Geun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Collagen-based bioinks for hard tissue engineering applications: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  C F Marques; G S Diogo; S Pina; J M Oliveira; T H Silva; R L Reis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 6.  Recent advances in high-strength and elastic hydrogels for 3D printing in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Cancan Xu; Guohao Dai; Yi Hong
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gareth Turnbull; Jon Clarke; Frédéric Picard; Philip Riches; Luanluan Jia; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

9.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Process-Structure-Quality Relationships of Three-Dimensional Printed Poly(Caprolactone)-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sam Gerdes; Azadeh Mostafavi; Srikanthan Ramesh; Adnan Memic; Iris V Rivero; Prahalada Rao; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.