Literature DB >> 27632282

Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.

Nikhil C Munshi1, Herve Avet-Loiseau2, Andy C Rawstron3, Roger G Owen3, J Anthony Child4, Anjan Thakurta5, Paul Sherrington6, Mehmet Kemal Samur1, Anna Georgieva7, Kenneth C Anderson1, Walter M Gregory4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Numerous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Most studies were small and varied in terms of patient population, treatment, and MRD assessment methods.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of MRD detection in patients with newly diagnosed MM. DATA SOURCES: A Medline search was conducted for articles published in English between January 1990 and January 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies reported MRD status and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in 20 or more patients following treatment. Among 405 articles identified, 21 met the initial eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Information on patient characteristics, treatment, MRD assessment, and outcomes were extracted using a standard form. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The impact of MRD status on PFS and OS was assessed by pooling data from relevant trials. Data were adjusted to allow for different proportions of patients with MRD in different studies, and analyzed using the Peto method. Forest plots were created based on Cox model analysis. Other prespecified research questions were addressed qualitatively.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 1273) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS, and 12 studies (n = 1100) on OS. Results were reported specifically in patients who had achieved conventional complete response (CR) in 5 studies for PFS (n = 574) and 6 studies for OS (n = 616). An MRD-negative status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48; P < .001) and in studies specifically looking at CR patients (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.56; P < .001). Overall survival was also favorable in MRD-negative patients overall (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71; P < .001) and in CR patients (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P < .001). Tests of heterogeneity found no significant differences among the studies for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Minimal residual disease-negative status after treatment for newly diagnosed MM is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of MM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27632282      PMCID: PMC5943640          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  38 in total

1.  Immunophenotypic evaluation of the plasma cell compartment in multiple myeloma: a tool for comparing the efficacy of different treatment strategies and predicting outcome.

Authors:  Jesús F San Miguel; Julia Almeida; Gema Mateo; Joan Bladé; Consuelo López-Berges; Dolores Caballero; José Hernández; María Jesús Moro; Javier Fernández-Calvo; Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Front-line transplantation program with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination as induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma: a phase II study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome.

Authors:  Murielle Roussel; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Nelly Robillard; Cyrille Hulin; Xavier Leleu; Lotfi Benboubker; Gérald Marit; Philippe Moreau; Brigitte Pegourie; Denis Caillot; Christophe Fruchart; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Catherine Gentil; Soraya Wuilleme; Anne Huynh; Benjamin Hebraud; Jill Corre; Marie-Lorraine Chretien; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  F E Davies; P D Forsyth; A C Rawstron; R G Owen; G Pratt; P A Evans; S J Richards; M Drayson; G M Smith; P J Selby; J A Child; G J Morgan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Brian Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Joan Blade; Paul Richardson; Robert Orlowski; David Siegel; Sundar Jagannath; Thierry Facon; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Sagar Lonial; Antonio Palumbo; Jeffrey Zonder; Heinz Ludwig; David Vesole; Orhan Sezer; Nikhil C Munshi; Jesus San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Comparison of immunofixation, serum free light chain, and immunophenotyping for response evaluation and prognostication in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Maria-Belen Vidriales; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Maria-Angeles Montalban; Elena Fernandez-Redondo; Lourdes Alonso; Albert Oriol; Ana-Isabel Teruel; Raquel de Paz; José-Garcia Laraña; Enrique Bengoechea; Alejandro Martin; Joaquin Diaz Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Joan Bladé; Alberto Orfao; Juan-Jose Lahuerta; Jesus F San Miguel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  New tools for diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jesús F San-Miguel; Bruno Paiva; Norma C Gutiérrez
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2013

7.  Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease in the peripheral blood of patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Mark Korthals; Nina Sehnke; Ralf Kronenwett; Thomas Schroeder; Tobias Strapatsas; Guido Kobbe; Rainer Haas; Roland Fenk
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Controversies in the assessment of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: clinical significance of minimal residual disease negativity using highly sensitive techniques.

Authors:  Noa Biran; Scott Ely; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction.

Authors:  Andy C Rawstron; Walter M Gregory; Ruth M de Tute; Faith E Davies; Sue E Bell; Mark T Drayson; Gordon Cook; Graham H Jackson; Gareth J Morgan; J Anthony Child; Roger G Owen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Detection of minimal residual disease by flow cytometry for patients with multiple myeloma submitted to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Suzane Dal Bó; Annelise Pezzi; Bruna Amorin; Vanessa Valim; Rosane Isabel Bittencourt; Lucia Silla
Journal:  ISRN Hematol       Date:  2013-06-20
View more
  133 in total

Review 1.  Case-based roundtable on treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Sergio Giralt; Eric Seifter
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 2.  Overcoming multiple myeloma drug resistance in the era of cancer 'omics'.

Authors:  Matthew Ho Zhi Guang; Amanda McCann; Giada Bianchi; Li Zhang; Paul Dowling; Despina Bazou; Peter O'Gorman; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Progress and Paradigms in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Treatment approach for young, fit, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Saad Z Usmani; Eric Seifter
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

5.  The prognostic value of the depth of response in multiple myeloma depends on the time of assessment, risk status and molecular subtype.

Authors:  Carolina Schinke; Antje Hoering; Hongwei Wang; Victoria Carlton; Sharmilan Thanandrarajan; Shayu Deshpande; Purvi Patel; Gabor Molnar; Sandra Susanibar; Meera Mohan; Pankaj Mathur; Muthukumar Radhakrishnan; Shadiqul Hoque; Jorge Jo Kamimoto; Monica Grazziutti; Frits van Rhee; Maurizio Zangari; Giovanni Insuasti-Beltran; Daisy Alapat; Ginell Post; Shmuel Yaccoby; Joshua Epstein; Leo Rasche; Sarah Johnson; Martin Moorhead; Tom Willis; Bart Barlogie; Brian Walker; Niels Weinhold; Faith E Davies; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Whither Radioimmunotherapy: To Be or Not To Be?

Authors:  Damian J Green; Oliver W Press
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  High-risk smoldering myeloma versus early detection of multiple myeloma: Current models, goals of therapy, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Chutima Kunacheewa; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 8.  Daratumumab for the treatment of AL amyloidosis.

Authors:  M Hasib Sidiqi; Morie A Gertz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2018-07-22

Review 9.  Myeloma in Elderly Patients: When Less Is More and More Is More.

Authors:  Ashley Rosko; Sergio Giralt; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

10.  The role of novel agents for consolidation after autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nico Gagelmann; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.