Literature DB >> 11260088

The impact of attaining a minimal disease state after high-dose melphalan and autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma.

F E Davies1, P D Forsyth, A C Rawstron, R G Owen, G Pratt, P A Evans, S J Richards, M Drayson, G M Smith, P J Selby, J A Child, G J Morgan.   

Abstract

Initial studies with high-dose therapy (HDT) in myeloma suggest some beneficial effects of attaining a complete response (CR); however, the effect on survival is difficult to assess owing to inconsistencies in the definition of response between studies. We have analysed 96 newly diagnosed patients aged less than 65 years who received HDT and assessed the effect of response on survival using electrophoresis, immunofixation and fluorescent IgH polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to define CR. Patients received induction chemotherapy with C-VAMP (adriamycin, vincristine, methylprednisolone, cyclophosphamide) followed by melphalan 200 mg/m2 and reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells. There was a high response to C-VAMP [CR = 24%, partial response (PR) = 64%], with all but one patient improving the depth of response after HDT (CR = 69%, PR = 31%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were excellent at a median of 46.4 months and 72+ months. There was a trend towards an improved PFS in patients with an immunofixation-negative CR compared with patients with a PR (49.4 months, 41.14 months; P = 0.26). This was not evident when electrophoresis was used to define CR. The method used to define CR did not impact on the overall survival and fluorescent IgH PCR failed to add any additional prognostic information. This study supports the widespread use of the European Bone Marrow Transplantation group (EBMT) response criteria and suggests that immunofixation should be performed on all patients who become electrophoresis negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11260088     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02530.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  17 in total

Review 1.  Assessing minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Andy C Rawstron; Peter Hillmen
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J Pérez; Maria A Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de Las Heras; Maria V Mateos; Maria C López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; Jose Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan J Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Application of self-quenched JH consensus primers for real-time quantitative PCR of IGH gene to minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Pilar Martinez-Sanchez; Ramon Garcia-Sanz; Maria Eugenia Sarasquete; Rosa Ayala; Marcos Gonzalez; Jose Manuel Bautista; David Gonzalez; Jesus San Miguel; Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Juan Jose Lahuerta
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 4.  What we mean when we talk about MRD in myeloma. A review of current methods. Part 1 of a two-part series.

Authors:  Scott Ely; Noa Biran; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  Treatment strategies in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: current status.

Authors:  Hang Quach; H Miles Prince; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry.

Authors:  N Puig; M E Sarasquete; A Balanzategui; J Martínez; B Paiva; H García; S Fumero; C Jiménez; M Alcoceba; M C Chillón; E Sebastián; L Marín; M A Montalbán; M V Mateos; A Oriol; L Palomera; J de la Rubia; M B Vidriales; J Bladé; J J Lahuerta; M González; J F S Miguel; R García-Sanz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Initial Therapy of Multiple Myeloma in Patients who are Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  William Bensinger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-04

Review 8.  Controversies in the assessment of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: clinical significance of minimal residual disease negativity using highly sensitive techniques.

Authors:  Noa Biran; Scott Ely; Ajai Chari
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.952

9.  Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Andy C Rawstron; Roger G Owen; J Anthony Child; Anjan Thakurta; Paul Sherrington; Mehmet Kemal Samur; Anna Georgieva; Kenneth C Anderson; Walter M Gregory
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Bortezomib: the evidence of its clinical impact in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Simon Lancaster
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2006-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.