Literature DB >> 27632154

The Effect of Torque Application Technique on Screw Preload of Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Hanan Nejer Al-Otaibi, Ahlam Almutairi, Jawza Alfarraj, Wejdan Algesadi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of different torque application techniques (torqued, retorqued once, and retorqued twice) on the removal torque of implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four Nobel Biocare implants (4.3 × 13 + 3; 13-mm thread height + 3-mm collar height) were stabilized temporarily inside four holes made in an acrylic mandibular master model. A metal framework was constructed, casted, and finished using a standardized technique. A passively fitting framework was achieved by removing the implants from the acrylic master model and hand-screwing them to the metal framework. Then, the whole assembly was restabilized in the acrylic master model. The torque experiment consisted of three protocols: (1) torquing screws to 35 Ncm a single time; (2) torquing the screws to 35 Ncm and then immediately retorquing the same screws to the same value; and (3) torquing the same screws to 35 Ncm three consecutive times. Removal torque was recorded for each implant using a digital torque meter.
RESULTS: The highest torque value was recorded for the retorqued-once application technique (29.5 ± 1.5 Ncm); next was the torqued technique (27.9 ± 0.7 Ncm); and, last was the retorqued-twice technique (27.2 ± 1.6 Ncm). The Games-Howell post hoc test showed that the retorqued-once application technique resulted in significantly higher torque values than the torqued and retorqued-twice torque application techniques (P ≤ .05).
CONCLUSION: Retightening abutment screws once after the initial torquing could enhance the removal torque of the screw. Care must be taken when retorquing the screws more than once, as this may inversely affect the removal torque.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27632154     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Complete mechanical characterization of an external hexagonal implant connection: in vitro study, 3D FEM, and probabilistic fatigue.

Authors:  María Prados-Privado; Sérgio A Gehrke; Rosa Rojo; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  In Vitro Study of Preload Loss in Different Implant Abutment Connection Designs.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Marta Relvas; Ana Cristina Braga; Blanca Ríos-Carrasco; Javier Gil; José Vicente Rios-Santos; Ana Fernández-Palacín; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.

Authors:  S Nithyapriya; A S Ramesh; A Kirubakaran; Jeevitha Mani; J Raghunathan
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.

Authors:  Ana Sofia Vinhas; Carlos Aroso; Filomena Salazar; Paula López-Jarana; José Vicente Ríos-Santos; Mariano Herrero-Climent
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The effect of the digital manufacturing technique of cantilevered implant-supported frameworks on abutment screw preload.

Authors:  Shahad Mohammmed Altuwaijri; Hanan Nejer Alotaibi; Talal Mughaileth Alnassar
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 1.904

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.