Dvora Joseph Davey1, José António Nhavoto, Orvalho Augusto, Walter Ponce, Daila Traca, Alexandre Nguimfack, Cesar Palha de Sousa. 1. *Ark, Maputo, Mozambique;†Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA;‡Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique;§School of Business, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden; and‖Department of Community Health, Eduardo Mondlane University, Maputo, Mozambique.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether regular mobile phone text reminders improved patients' retention in antiretroviral therapy (ART) care in Mozambique. DESIGN:SMSaúde was a randomized control trial of HIV-infected patients on ART who receivedregular text message reminder vs. standard of care at 3 public health facilities in Maputo Province, Mozambique. The primary outcome was retention in HIV care. Between November 2011 and March 2012, 830 eligible HIV-infected patients on ART were randomized 1:1 to the text reminder intervention or standard of care. METHODS: We used Kaplan-Meier estimators and log-rank tests to compare proportions of patients who received SMS reminders who were retained in HIV care compared to the control group who received standard of care. Post hoc analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by urban/rural facility and when initiated ART (≤3 months vs. >3 months). Hazard ratios and confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Analysis was with intention to treat. RESULTS: Patients who received text messages had lower attrition from HIV care at 12 months, though the difference was nonsignificant (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.13). Among urban patients, text messages improved retention in HIV care (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.95). Intervention patients newly initiated on ART (<3 months) had lower attrition than control patients (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.91), especially urban newly initiated patients (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.64). Text messages had no effect on retention among rural patients. CONCLUSIONS: Text messages did not improve retention in HIV care for all patients on ART but improved retention in care of urban patients and those who recently started ART and received text reminders compared with standard of care.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether regular mobile phone text reminders improved patients' retention in antiretroviral therapy (ART) care in Mozambique. DESIGN: SMSaúde was a randomized control trial of HIV-infectedpatients on ART who received regular text message reminder vs. standard of care at 3 public health facilities in Maputo Province, Mozambique. The primary outcome was retention in HIV care. Between November 2011 and March 2012, 830 eligible HIV-infectedpatients on ART were randomized 1:1 to the text reminder intervention or standard of care. METHODS: We used Kaplan-Meier estimators and log-rank tests to compare proportions of patients who received SMS reminders who were retained in HIV care compared to the control group who received standard of care. Post hoc analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by urban/rural facility and when initiated ART (≤3 months vs. >3 months). Hazard ratios and confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Analysis was with intention to treat. RESULTS:Patients who received text messages had lower attrition from HIV care at 12 months, though the difference was nonsignificant (RR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.13). Among urban patients, text messages improved retention in HIV care (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.95). Intervention patients newly initiated on ART (<3 months) had lower attrition than control patients (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.91), especially urban newly initiated patients (HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.64). Text messages had no effect on retention among rural patients. CONCLUSIONS: Text messages did not improve retention in HIV care for all patients on ART but improved retention in care of urban patients and those who recently started ART and received text reminders compared with standard of care.
Authors: Richard T Lester; Paul Ritvo; Edward J Mills; Antony Kariri; Sarah Karanja; Michael H Chung; William Jack; James Habyarimana; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Carlo A Marra; Benson Estambale; Elizabeth Ngugi; T Blake Ball; Lehana Thabane; Lawrence J Gelmon; Joshua Kimani; Marta Ackers; Francis A Plummer Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thiago Martini da Costa; Bárbara Jaqueline Peres Barbosa; Durval Alex Gomes e Costa; Daniel Sigulem; Heimar de Fátima Marin; Adauto Castelo Filho; Ivan Torres Pisa Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Kalee F Foreman; Karen M Stockl; Lisa B Le; Eric Fisk; Sameer M Shah; Heidi C Lew; Brian K Solow; Bradford S Curtis Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: M Vervloet; L van Dijk; J Santen-Reestman; B van Vlijmen; P van Wingerden; M L Bouvy; D H de Bakker Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Lehana Thabane; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo; Richard T Lester; Edward J Mills; Marek Smieja; Lisa Dolovich; Charles Kouanfack Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marcia Vervloet; Liset van Dijk; Jacqueline Santen-Reestman; Bas van Vlijmen; Marcel L Bouvy; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Andrew Zolopa; Janet Andersen; William Powderly; Alejandro Sanchez; Ian Sanne; Carol Suckow; Evelyn Hogg; Lauren Komarow Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-05-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthew D Hickey; Thomas A Odeny; Maya Petersen; Torsten B Neilands; Nancy Padian; Nathan Ford; Zachary Matthay; David Hoos; Meg Doherty; Chris Beryer; Stefan Baral; Elvin H Geng Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: James Ayieko; Maya L Petersen; Edwin D Charlebois; Lillian B Brown; Tamara D Clark; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Moses R Kamya; Craig R Cohen; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Diane V Havlir; Annelies Van Rie Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731