Carmela Alcántara1, Xinliang Li2, Ye Wang2, Glorisa Canino3, Margarita Alegría2. 1. School of Social Work. 2. Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital. 3. Behavioral Sciences Research Institute, University of Puerto Rico Medical School.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data to determine if the Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA) intervention, a brief, evidence-based, and culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral intervention specifically designed for and effective at treating depression, also reduced co-occurring worry symptoms. We also explored whether delivery modality (telephone, face-to-face) and sociodemographic patient characteristics moderated treatment effectiveness. METHOD:Between May 2011 and September 2012, low-income Latino primary care patients (N = 257) with depression from Boston and San Juan were randomized to usual care (n = 86), face-to-face ECLA (n = 84), or telephone ECLA (n = 87) and completed a psychosocial assessment at baseline and 4 months after randomization. We used intention-to-treat analyses with linear regression models with change in worry (4 months from randomization) as the primary outcome and treatment condition as the primary predictor. RESULTS: Patients in ECLA experienced significant reductions in worry at 4 months from randomization than those in usual care (PSWQΔ = -3.28, p < .05). Among patients receiving ECLA, those in the telephone condition exhibited greater worry reductions than those in the face-to-face condition (telephone: M = -7.83, SD = 11.45; face-to-face: M = -6.73, SD = 12.23; p < .05). Employment status was the only significant treatment moderator. Unemployed patients did not exhibit any changes in worry irrespective of condition, whereas employed patients exhibited the greatest worry reductions across conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Although worry was not a treatment target in ECLA, it also reduced worry among low-income Latinos, which suggests ECLA may have transdiagnostic clinical implications. Telephone-delivered ECLA might hold promise for increasing the uptake of mental health care among employed low-income Latinos. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data to determine if the Engagement and Counseling for Latinos (ECLA) intervention, a brief, evidence-based, and culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral intervention specifically designed for and effective at treating depression, also reduced co-occurring worry symptoms. We also explored whether delivery modality (telephone, face-to-face) and sociodemographic patient characteristics moderated treatment effectiveness. METHOD: Between May 2011 and September 2012, low-income Latino primary care patients (N = 257) with depression from Boston and San Juan were randomized to usual care (n = 86), face-to-face ECLA (n = 84), or telephone ECLA (n = 87) and completed a psychosocial assessment at baseline and 4 months after randomization. We used intention-to-treat analyses with linear regression models with change in worry (4 months from randomization) as the primary outcome and treatment condition as the primary predictor. RESULTS:Patients in ECLA experienced significant reductions in worry at 4 months from randomization than those in usual care (PSWQΔ = -3.28, p < .05). Among patients receiving ECLA, those in the telephone condition exhibited greater worry reductions than those in the face-to-face condition (telephone: M = -7.83, SD = 11.45; face-to-face: M = -6.73, SD = 12.23; p < .05). Employment status was the only significant treatment moderator. Unemployed patients did not exhibit any changes in worry irrespective of condition, whereas employed patients exhibited the greatest worry reductions across conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Although worry was not a treatment target in ECLA, it also reduced worry among low-income Latinos, which suggests ECLA may have transdiagnostic clinical implications. Telephone-delivered ECLA might hold promise for increasing the uptake of mental health care among employed low-income Latinos. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: T Bedirhan Ustün; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Jürgen Rehm; Cille Kennedy; Joanne Epping-Jordan; Shekhar Saxena; Michael von Korff; Charles Pull Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Margarita Alegría; Evette Ludman; E Nilay Kafali; Sheri Lapatin; Doriliz Vila; Patrick E Shrout; Kristen Keefe; Benjamin Cook; Andrea Ault; Xinliang Li; Amy M Bauer; Claudia Epelbaum; Carmela Alcantara; Tulia I G Pineda; Gloria G Tejera; Gloria Suau; Karla Leon; Anna S Lessios; Rafael R Ramirez; Glorisa Canino Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Benjamin Lê Cook; Samuel H Zuvekas; Nicholas Carson; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Andrew Vesper; Thomas G McGuire Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Maurizio Fava; A John Rush; Jonathan E Alpert; G K Balasubramani; Stephen R Wisniewski; Cheryl N Carmin; Melanie M Biggs; Sidney Zisook; Andrew Leuchter; Robert Howland; Diane Warden; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Lara Lopez; Fernando L Vázquez; Ángela J Torres; Patricia Otero; Vanessa Blanco; Olga Díaz; Mario Páramo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390