Literature DB >> 27631632

A "looming bias" in spatial hearing? Effects of acoustic intensity and spectrum on categorical sound source localization.

Lisa McCarthy1, Kirk N Olsen2,3.   

Abstract

Continuous increases of acoustic intensity (up-ramps) can indicate a looming (approaching) sound source in the environment, whereas continuous decreases of intensity (down-ramps) can indicate a receding sound source. From psychoacoustic experiments, an "adaptive perceptual bias" for up-ramp looming tonal stimuli has been proposed (Neuhoff, 1998). This theory postulates that (1) up-ramps are perceptually salient because of their association with looming and potentially threatening stimuli in the environment; (2) tonal stimuli are perceptually salient because of an association with single and potentially threatening biological sound sources in the environment, relative to white noise, which is more likely to arise from dispersed signals and nonthreatening/nonbiological sources (wind/ocean). In the present study, we extrapolated the "adaptive perceptual bias" theory and investigated its assumptions by measuring sound source localization in response to acoustic stimuli presented in azimuth to imply looming, stationary, and receding motion in depth. Participants (N = 26) heard three directions of intensity change (up-ramps, down-ramps, and steady state, associated with looming, receding, and stationary motion, respectively) and three levels of acoustic spectrum (a 1-kHz pure tone, the tonal vowel /ә/, and white noise) in a within-subjects design. We first hypothesized that if up-ramps are "perceptually salient" and capable of eliciting adaptive responses, then they would be localized faster and more accurately than down-ramps. This hypothesis was supported. However, the results did not support the second hypothesis. Rather, the white-noise and vowel conditions were localized faster and more accurately than the pure-tone conditions. These results are discussed in the context of auditory and visual theories of motion perception, auditory attentional capture, and the spectral causes of spatial ambiguity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory attention; Auditory looming; Localization; Loudness; Spatial hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27631632     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1201-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

2.  Asymmetries in behavioral and neural responses to spectral cues demonstrate the generality of auditory looming bias.

Authors:  Robert Baumgartner; Darrin K Reed; Brigitta Tóth; Virginia Best; Piotr Majdak; H Steven Colburn; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatial Cues Provided by Sound Improve Postural Stabilization: Evidence of a Spatial Auditory Map?

Authors:  Lennie Gandemer; Gaetan Parseihian; Richard Kronland-Martinet; Christophe Bourdin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Effects of Exogenous Auditory Attention on Temporal and Spectral Resolution.

Authors:  Basak Günel; Christiane M Thiel; K Jannis Hildebrandt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-23

5.  The time course of auditory looming cues in redirecting visuo-spatial attention.

Authors:  Christiane Glatz; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Proximal Binaural Sound Can Induce Subjective Frisson.

Authors:  Shiori Honda; Yuri Ishikawa; Rei Konno; Eiko Imai; Natsumi Nomiyama; Kazuki Sakurada; Takuya Koumura; Hirohito M Kondo; Shigeto Furukawa; Shinya Fujii; Masashi Nakatani
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.