Literature DB >> 27629704

Dopamine Manipulation Affects Response Vigor Independently of Opportunity Cost.

Alexandre Zénon1, Sophie Devesse2, Etienne Olivier2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Dopamine is known to be involved in regulating effort investment in relation to reward, and the disruption of this mechanism is thought to be central in some pathological situations such as Parkinson's disease, addiction, and depression. According to an influential model, dopamine plays this role by encoding the opportunity cost, i.e., the average value of forfeited actions, which is an important parameter to take into account when making decisions about which action to undertake and how fast to execute it. We tested this hypothesis by asking healthy human participants to perform two effort-based decision-making tasks, following either placebo or levodopa intake in a double blind within-subject protocol. In the effort-constrained task, there was a trade-off between the amount of force exerted and the time spent in executing the task, such that investing more effort decreased the opportunity cost. In the time-constrained task, the effort duration was constant, but exerting more force allowed the subject to earn more substantial reward instead of saving time. Contrary to the model predictions, we found that levodopa caused an increase in the force exerted only in the time-constrained task, in which there was no trade-off between effort and opportunity cost. In addition, a computational model showed that dopamine manipulation left the opportunity cost factor unaffected but altered the ratio between the effort cost and reinforcement value. These findings suggest that dopamine does not represent the opportunity cost but rather modulates how much effort a given reward is worth. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Dopamine has been proposed in a prevalent theory to signal the average reward rate, used to estimate the cost of investing time in an action, also referred to as opportunity cost. We contrasted the effect of dopamine manipulation in healthy participants in two tasks, in which increasing response vigor (i.e., the amount of effort invested in an action) allowed either to save time or to earn more reward. We found that levodopa-a synthetic precursor of dopamine-increases response vigor only in the latter situation, demonstrating that, rather than the opportunity cost, dopamine is involved in computing the expected value of effort.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/369516-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational model; decision making; dopamine; effort-based decision making; psychopharmacology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629704      PMCID: PMC6601940          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4467-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

Review 1.  Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Mark E Walton; Thomas C Jhou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function-implications for L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Functions of mesolimbic dopamine: changing concepts and shifting paradigms.

Authors:  John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Beyond the reward hypothesis: alternative functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; S M Mingote; S M Weber
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.547

5.  Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor.

Authors:  Yael Niv; Nathaniel D Daw; Daphna Joel; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: implications for studies of natural motivation, psychiatry, and drug abuse.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; S Mingote; S M Weber
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 7.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Why don't we move faster? Parkinson's disease, movement vigor, and implicit motivation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; Anna Hristova; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  An economic approach to animal models of alcoholism.

Authors:  G M Heyman
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2000

10.  A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Izumi Fukunaga; Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  22 in total

1.  Effects of average reward rate on vigor as a function of individual variation in striatal dopamine.

Authors:  Lieke Hofmans; Andrew Westbrook; Ruben van den Bosch; Jan Booij; Robbert-Jan Verkes; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Vigor, Effort-Related Aspects of Motivation and Anhedonia.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; John D Salamone
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

3.  Methylphenidate boosts choices of mental labor over leisure depending on striatal dopamine synthesis capacity.

Authors:  Lieke Hofmans; Danae Papadopetraki; Ruben van den Bosch; Jessica I Määttä; Monja I Froböse; Bram B Zandbelt; Andrew Westbrook; Robbert-Jan Verkes; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Motor cortical thickness is related to effort-based decision-making in humans.

Authors:  Amith Umesh; Kwame S Kutten; Patrick S Hogan; J Tilak Ratnanather; Vikram S Chib
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dopamine and Proximity in Motivation and Cognitive Control.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael Frank
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-04

6.  Noradrenergic But Not Dopaminergic Neurons Signal Task State Changes and Predict Reengagement After a Failure.

Authors:  Caroline I Jahn; Chiara Varazzani; Jérôme Sallet; Mark E Walton; Sébastien Bouret
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on effort-based decision-making and reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Heather E Soder; Jessica A Cooper; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Jennifer K Hoots; Cecilia Nunez; Victoria M Lawlor; Scott D Lane; Michael T Treadway; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 8.  Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Jen-Hau Yang; Renee Rotolo; Rose Presby
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.

Authors:  Heather E Webber; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Sydney N Stamatovich; Harriet de Wit; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 10.  A mosaic of cost-benefit control over cortico-striatal circuitry.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Michael J Frank; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 24.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.