Literature DB >> 17031711

Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor.

Yael Niv1, Nathaniel D Daw, Daphna Joel, Peter Dayan.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Dopamine neurotransmission has long been known to exert a powerful influence over the vigor, strength, or rate of responding. However, there exists no clear understanding of the computational foundation for this effect; predominant accounts of dopamine's computational function focus on a role for phasic dopamine in controlling the discrete selection between different actions and have nothing to say about response vigor or indeed the free-operant tasks in which it is typically measured.
OBJECTIVES: We seek to accommodate free-operant behavioral tasks within the realm of models of optimal control and thereby capture how dopaminergic and motivational manipulations affect response vigor.
METHODS: We construct an average reward reinforcement learning model in which subjects choose both which action to perform and also the latency with which to perform it. Optimal control balances the costs of acting quickly against the benefits of getting reward earlier and thereby chooses a best response latency.
RESULTS: In this framework, the long-run average rate of reward plays a key role as an opportunity cost and mediates motivational influences on rates and vigor of responding. We review evidence suggesting that the average reward rate is reported by tonic levels of dopamine putatively in the nucleus accumbens.
CONCLUSIONS: Our extension of reinforcement learning models to free-operant tasks unites psychologically and computationally inspired ideas about the role of tonic dopamine in striatum, explaining from a normative point of view why higher levels of dopamine might be associated with more vigorous responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17031711     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  85 in total

Review 1.  The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?

Authors:  P Redgrave; T J Prescott; K Gurney
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  The dynamics of operant conditioning.

Authors:  V Dragoi; J E Staddon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Opponent interactions between serotonin and dopamine.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Daw; Sham Kakade; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

4.  Performance on ratio and interval schedules with matched reinforcement rates.

Authors:  G R Dawson; A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1990-08

Review 5.  Respective contributions of neuronal activity and presynaptic mechanisms in the control of the in vivo release of dopamine.

Authors:  A Chéramy; L Barbeito; G Godeheu; J M Desce; A Pittaluga; T Galli; F Artaud; J Glowinski
Journal:  J Neural Transm Suppl       Date:  1990

Review 6.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Lesion to the nigrostriatal dopamine system disrupts stimulus-response habit formation.

Authors:  Alexis Faure; Ulrike Haberland; Françoise Condé; Nicole El Massioui
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Value-dependent selection in the brain: simulation in a synthetic neural model.

Authors:  K J Friston; G Tononi; G N Reeke; O Sporns; G M Edelman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Differential involvement of serotonin and dopamine systems in cost-benefit decisions about delay or effort.

Authors:  F Denk; M E Walton; K A Jennings; T Sharp; M F S Rushworth; D M Bannerman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions alter relative response allocation in a T-maze cost/benefit task.

Authors:  M S Cousins; A Atherton; L Turner; J D Salamone
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  427 in total

Review 1.  From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Tiago V Maia; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Building a neuroscience of pleasure and well-being.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Psychol Well Being       Date:  2011-10-24

3.  Action selection and action value in frontal-striatal circuits.

Authors:  Moonsang Seo; Eunjeong Lee; Bruno B Averbeck
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Motivated cognitive control: reward incentives modulate preparatory neural activity during task-switching.

Authors:  Adam C Savine; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Separate value comparison and learning mechanisms in macaque medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  M P Noonan; M E Walton; T E J Behrens; J Sallet; M J Buckley; M F S Rushworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Nucleus accumbens-derived glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is a retrograde enhancer of dopaminergic tone in the mesocorticolimbic system.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Sebastien Carnicella; Somayeh Ahmadiantehrani; Dao-Yao He; Segev Barak; Viktor Kharazia; Sami Ben Hamida; Agustin Zapata; Toni S Shippenberg; Dorit Ron
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  Where attention falls: Increased risk of falls from the converging impact of cortical cholinergic and midbrain dopamine loss on striatal function.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Roger L Albin; Aaron Kucinski; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Neural Signatures of Prediction Errors in a Decision-Making Task Are Modulated by Action Execution Failures.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Peter A Butcher; Darius E Parvin; Fasial Mushtaq; Yael Niv; Richard B Ivry; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.