Literature DB >> 27629688

Mentorship perceptions and experiences among academic family medicine faculty: Findings from a quantitative, comprehensive work-life and leadership survey.

Barbara Stubbs1, Paul Krueger2, David White3, Christopher Meaney4, Jeffrey Kwong5, Viola Antao6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To collect information about the types, frequency, importance, and quality of mentorship received among academic family medicine faculty, and to identify variables associated with receiving high-quality mentorship.
DESIGN: Web-based survey of all faculty members of an academic department of family medicine.
SETTING: The Department of Family and Community Medicine of the University of Toronto in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: All 1029 faculty members were invited to complete the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Receiving mentorship rated as very good or excellent in 1 or more of 6 content areas relevant to respondents' professional lives, and information about demographic and practice characteristics, faculty ratings of their local departments and main practice settings, teaching activities, professional development, leadership, job satisfaction, and health. Bivariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with receiving high-quality mentorship.
RESULTS: The response rate was 66.8%. Almost all (95.0%) respondents had received mentorship in several areas, with informal mentorship being the most prevalent mode. Approximately 60% of respondents rated at least 1 area of mentoring as very good or excellent. Multivariate logistic regression identified 5 factors associated with an increased likelihood of rating mentorship quality as very good or excellent: positive perceptions of their local department (odds ratio [OR] = 4.02, 95% CI 2.47 to 6.54, P < .001); positive ratings of practice infrastructure (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.80, P = .003); increased frequency of receiving mentorship (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.89, P < .001); fewer years in practice (OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.12, P = .007); and practising in a family practice teaching unit (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.27, P = .040).
CONCLUSION: With increasing emphasis on distributed education and community-based teachers, family medicine faculties will need to develop strategies to support effective mentorship across a range of settings and career stages. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629688      PMCID: PMC5023363     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  14 in total

1.  Mentorship in an academic department of family medicine.

Authors:  Margaret Riley; Eric Skye; Barbara D Reed
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Mentoring faculty in academic medicine. A new paradigm?

Authors:  Linda Pololi; Sharon Knight
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships.

Authors:  Ronald A Berk; Janet Berg; Rosemary Mortimer; Benita Walton-Moss; Theresa P Yeo
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine.

Authors:  Dario Sambunjak; Sharon E Straus; Ana Marusic
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty.

Authors:  J A Morzinski; S Diehr; D J Bower; D E Simpson
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Defining the ideal qualities of mentorship: a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of outstanding mentors.

Authors:  Christine S Cho; Radhika A Ramanan; Mitchell D Feldman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Identifying potential academic leaders: Predictors of willingness to undertake leadership roles in an academic department of family medicine.

Authors:  David White; Paul Krueger; Christopher Meaney; Viola Antao; Florence Kim; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman; Patricia A Arean; Sally J Marshall; Mark Lovett; Patricia O'Sullivan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-04-23

9.  Exploring and understanding academic leadership in family medicine.

Authors:  Ivy Oandasan; David White; Melanie Hammond Mobilio; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Kymm Feldman; Florence Kim; Katherine Rouleau; Leslie Sorensen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Mentoring at the University of Pennsylvania: results of a faculty survey.

Authors:  Alan G Wasserstein; D Alex Quistberg; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Learner-centred research mentoring in academic family medicine.

Authors:  William R Phillips
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Quebec College of Family Physicians' new formal mentorship program.

Authors:  Luc Côté; Dominique Deschênes; Éveline Hudon; Sophie Galarneau; Geneviève Bolduc
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured-videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development.

Authors:  Christopher A Jones; Franklin S Watkins; Julie Williams; Ann Lambros; Kathryn E Callahan; Janice Lawlor; Jeff D Williamson; Kevin P High; Hal H Atkinson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2019-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.