Literature DB >> 27629569

Home visits and nursing home visits by early-career GPs: a cross-sectional study.

Parker Magin1,2, Nigel Catzikiris2, Amanda Tapley2, Simon Morgan3, Elizabeth G Holliday4,5, Jean Ball5, Kim Henderson2, Taryn Elliott6, Cathy Regan4,2, Neil Spike7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Home visits (HVs) and nursing home visits (NHVs) are accepted as core elements of general practice. There is concern regarding declining rates of HVs and an increasing demand for NHVs together with a perceived decreased willingness of younger GPs to provide these services.
OBJECTIVES: To establish the prevalence and associations of recently vocationally qualified GPs ('graduates') performing HVs and NHVs.
METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of recent (within 5 years) graduates of 3 of Australia's 17 regional general practice training programs. Outcome factors were performing, as part of current practice, HVs and NHVs. Factors associated with each outcome were assessed by logistic regression with graduate and current practice characteristics and vocational training experiences as independent variables.
RESULTS: Of 230 responding graduates, 48.1% performed HVs and 40.6% performed NHVs in their current clinical GP role. Factors associated with both HVs and NHVs were participating in in-practice clinical teaching/supervision [odds ratios (ORs) 2.65 and 2.66], conducting HVs/NHVs during training (ORs 5.05 and 10.8) and working full-time (ORs for part-time work 0.20 and 0.29). Further associations with performing HVs were older GP age (compared to <36 years: ORs 3.65 for 36-40 and 2.53 for 41+), smaller practice size (OR 0.53 for larger practices), Australian undergraduate education (OR 0.31 for non-Australian) and greater number of years in their current practice as a qualified GP (OR 1.25 per year).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings of graduates' modest engagement with HVs and NHVs reinforce concerns regarding Australian general practice's capacity to accommodate the needs of an aging population.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Ageing; family practice; general practice; house calls; nursing homes; residential facilities.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27629569     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

1.  GP home visits: essential patient care or disposable relic?

Authors:  Sarah Mitchell; Sarah Hillman; David Rapley; Sir Denis Pereira Gray; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  New alumni EXperiences of Training and independent Unsupervised Practice (NEXT-UP): protocol for a cross-sectional study of early career general practitioners.

Authors:  Parker Magin; Dominica Moad; Amanda Tapley; L Holliday; Andrew Davey; Neil Spike; Kristen FitzGerald; Catherine Kirby; Michael Bentley; Allison Turnock; Mieke L van Driel; Alison Fielding
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Burnout in French General Practitioners: A Nationwide Prospective Study.

Authors:  Frédéric Dutheil; Lenise M Parreira; Julia Eismann; François-Xavier Lesage; David Balayssac; Céline Lambert; Maëlys Clinchamps; Denis Pezet; Bruno Pereira; Bertrand Le Roy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Cross-sectional study of Australian medical student attitudes towards older people confirms a four-factor structure and psychometric properties of the Australian Ageing Semantic Differential.

Authors:  Mark Wilson; Yvonne Tran; Ian Wilson; Susan E Kurrle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.