Literature DB >> 27628712

Small molecule compounds that induce cellular senescence.

Nadezhda V Petrova1, Artem K Velichko1, Sergey V Razin1,2,3, Omar L Kantidze1,3.   

Abstract

To date, dozens of stress-induced cellular senescence phenotypes have been reported. These cellular senescence states may differ substantially from each other, as well as from replicative senescence through the presence of specific senescence features. Here, we attempted to catalog virtually all of the cellular senescence-like states that can be induced by low molecular weight compounds. We summarized biological markers, molecular pathways involved in senescence establishment, and specific traits of cellular senescence states induced by more than fifty small molecule compounds.
© 2016 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA replication stress; aging; cell stress; cellular senescence; epigenetic modifiers

Year:  2016        PMID: 27628712      PMCID: PMC6398529          DOI: 10.1111/acel.12518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Cell        ISSN: 1474-9718            Impact factor:   9.304


Cellular senescence is a stable arrest of the cell cycle and is characterized by complex phenotypic changes. It was first described in studies of human fibroblasts that ceased proliferation following an extended cultivation (Hayflick & Moorhead, 1961; Hayflick, 1965). Discovered by Hayflick and Moorhead, senescence in normal human cells was shown to depend on telomere dysfunction originating mainly from replication‐associated telomere shortening (Harley et al., 1990; Allsopp, 1996; Bodnar et al., 1998). This type of senescence is also known as replicative senescence and is the prototypical cellular senescence state. Other forms of senescence (i.e., not linked to proliferation‐dependent telomere shortening) include a variety of prematurely developed cellular senescence phenotypes, similar but not identical to replicative senescence. Many proliferative cell types can undergo so‐called stress‐induced premature senescence (SIPS) upon exposure to subcytotoxic stresses (UV, γ‐irradiation, H2O2, hyperoxia, etc.) (Toussaint et al., 2000, 2002). Oncogene‐induced senescence (OIS) represents another complex senescence phenotype that depends on activation and/or overexpression of oncogenes (Serrano et al., 1997; Bianchi‐Smiraglia & Nikiforov, 2012). The mechanism of OIS involves DNA damage that may be a result of DNA hyper‐replication (Di Micco et al., 2006), replication fork reversal (Neelsen et al., 2013), depletion of nucleotide pools (Mannava et al., 2013), and/or increased levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Lee et al., 1999). Conceptually and mechanistically, OIS is closely related to tumor‐suppressor loss‐induced senescence (Chen et al., 2005; Di Mitri & Alimonti, 2016). Cell‐to‐cell fusion‐induced senescence can also be considered a premature senescence subtype (Chuprin et al., 2013; Burton & Faragher, 2015). The distinctive phenotypic changes typical of various types of cellular senescence are cell enlargement and flattening, senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase activity (SA‐β‐gal), formation of senescence‐associated heterochromatin foci (SAHF), persistent DNA damage response (DDR), and senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP). However, these and several other facultative features of cellular senescence that manifest in each particular case of cell cycle arrest greatly depend on the senescence‐inducing stimulus and the cell type (Campisi, 2013; Salama et al., 2014). The contribution of cellular senescence to organismal aging is a question of ongoing research (van Deursen, 2014). However, strong evidence for this connection has been reported recently. Specifically, it was shown that clearance of age‐accumulated p16INK4A‐positive senescent cells in mice could extend their healthy lifespan (Baker et al., 2011, 2016). Several chemical compounds that specifically target senescent cells have been identified in the last 2 years (so‐called senolytic drugs) (Xu et al., 2015b; Zhu et al., 2015a,b). It was shown that clearance of senescent cells by such drugs may alleviate age‐related vasomotor dysfunction and frailty, enhance adipogenesis, rejuvenate haematopoietic stem cells after total‐body irradiation, and, generally, extend lifespan (Xu et al., 2015a; Zhu et al., 2015b; Roos et al., 2016). Furthermore, these studies confirm the known pathological impact of cellular senescence, exemplified by cellular dysfunction, impairment of tissue regeneration, detrimental effects on tissue microenvironment, etc. (Burton & Krizhanovsky, 2014). It is evident that along with its detrimental effects, cellular senescence has clearly defined beneficial physiological functions. For instance, it has been shown recently that cellular senescence plays a role in the differentiation of megakaryocytes (Besancenot et al., 2010), the maturation of the placenta (Chuprin et al., 2013), the restriction of fibrosis (Krizhanovsky et al., 2008; Jun & Lau, 2010; Zhu et al., 2013), tissue repair (Demaria et al., 2014), and embryonic development (Nacher et al., 2006; Munoz‐Espin et al., 2013; Storer et al., 2013). The role of cellular senescence in cancer prevention is well documented (Burton & Krizhanovsky, 2014; Munoz‐Espin & Serrano, 2014). It is generally agreed in the field that the most important features of cellular senescence are SASP and resistance to apoptosis (Munoz‐Espin & Serrano, 2014; Burton & Faragher, 2015). SASP stimulates immune system‐dependent elimination of unwanted precancerous cells or specific embryonic cells that undergo senescence. Notably, cellular senescence may serve as an alternative to apoptosis in embryonic development as well as in cancer prevention (Childs et al., 2014). It has been shown that failure to undergo senescence triggers apoptosis in a compensatory manner to eliminate transient structures during development (Munoz‐Espin et al., 2013; Storer et al., 2013). Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider some of the cellular senescence states (e.g., SIPS), along with apoptosis, autophagy, necrosis, etc., in terms of the cell stress response rather than aging. However, it is unclear whether or not the cellular senescence that is widely implicated in normal aging, chronic diseases, tumor suppression, tumorigenesis, cell differentiation, and embryogenesis represents a single physiological cellular state. To date, dozens of stress‐induced cellular senescence phenotypes have been reported. These senescence states may differ substantially from each other, as well as from replicative senescence, through the presence of specific senescence features. Additionally, it has been reported that some stress‐induced senescence states can be overcome, thus challenging the dogma that cellular senescence is an irreversible form of growth arrest (Romanov et al., 2001; Beausejour et al., 2003). Such caveats can lead to confusion regarding the terminology of stress‐induced cellular senescence states; it is not clear whether senescence‐like growth arrest (and variations thereof) resembles ‘true’ cellular senescence. The indispensable characteristics of this ‘true’ cellular senescence are also elusive. It can be argued that SASP (arising along with morphological changes and SA‐β‐gal) may be the most important physiologically relevant feature of cellular senescence; however, SASP has not been studied in most cases of stress‐induced senescence. Here, we attempt to catalog virtually all of the cellular senescence‐like states that can be induced by low molecular weight compounds (Table 1). We summarize the biological markers, molecular pathways involved in senescence establishment, and specific traits of cellular senescence states induced by small compounds, as well as the treatment conditions used. In total, we analyzed more than 50 chemical inducers of cellular senescence and senescence‐like states. These chemical compounds can be functionally classified into eight groups: (1) DNA replication stress inducers (aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, thymidine, bromodeoxyuridine, difluorodeoxycytidine, cyclopentenyl cytosine); (2) DNA‐damaging agents, including (2a) DNA topoisomerase inhibitors (doxorubicin, etoposide, daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, camptothecin), (2b) DNA cross‐linkers (cisplatin, mitomycin C, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, diaziquone), and (2c) drugs with complex effects (actinomycin D, bleomycin, temozolomide); (3) epigenetic modifiers that inhibit DNA methyltransferases (5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine), histone deacetylases (sodium butyrate, trichostatin A, MS‐275, SAHA, LBH589, phenylbutyric acid, valproic acid), histone acetyltransferases (curcumin, C646), and histone methyltransferases (BRD4770); (4) inhibitors of telomerase activity (SYUIQ‐5, BMVC4, pyridostatin, compound 115405, perylene and indole derivatives, harmine, BIBR1532, azidothymidine); (5) inhibitors of cyclin‐dependent kinases (palbociclib, roscovitine, ribociclib); (6) activators of p53 (nutlin 3a, FL118); (7) activators of protein kinase C (TPA/PMA, PEP005, PEP008); and (8) reactive oxygen species (ROS) inducers (hydrogen peroxide, tertbutyl hydroperoxide, phenyl‐2‐pyridyl ketoxime, phenylaminonaphthoquinones, paraquat).
Table 1

Low molecular weight compounds that induce cellular senescence

Small compounds/Mechanism of actionCell lineCellular senescence state (as described by authors)Senescence markers documentedSignaling pathways involvedCell cycle phase of the stable growth arrestTriggering conditions/Other notes (if any)References
(1) DNA replication stress inducers
 aphidicolin Inhibitor of DNA polymerase α HFFa REF52 Senescence‐like arrest Growth arrest γH2A.X foci p53‐p21↑ c p‐Rb↓ 150–200 nm for ~10 daysMarusyk et al. (2007)
MCF10 MCF7 Prolonged S‐phase senescence‐like arrest Large flattened cells with increased nuclear size (CSb‐like morphology) SA‐β‐Gal γH2A.X foci increased H3K9‐trimethylation p21↑ p‐Rb↓ S 1 μg mL−1 for 4 days reversible state of S‐phase arrest RPA foci Maya‐Mendoza et al. (2014)
 hydroxyurea Ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor HFFSenescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑400–800 μm for ~3 weeksYeo et al. (2000)
McA‐RH7777Senescence‐like arrestGrowth inhibitionp21↑G1200–400 μm for 4 daysHong et al. (2004)
HFF REF52 MCF10A Senescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γH2A.X foci p53‐p21↑ p‐p53Ser15↑ p‐p53Ser20↑ p16‐independent 100–150 μm for ~10 daysMarusyk et al. (2007)
K562Senescence‐like arrestSA‐β‐Gal p16↑ p21↑ p27↑ 50–600 μm for up to 14 daysPark et al. (2000)
 thymidine Excess of thymidine inhibits DNA replication by reducing the amount of dCTP synthesized HeLa TIG‐7 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal ERK1 and/or ERK2↑ 1.5 mm for 7–10 daysSumikawa et al. (2005), Kobayashi et al. (2012)
 bromodeoxyuridine Suppresses DNA replication HeLa S3 TIG‐7 Senescence‐like arrestp21↑50 μm for 4 daysEriko et al. (1999), Suzuki et al. (2001)
A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21↑ p‐Rb↓ p27↑ p57↑ S G2 200 μm for 7 days Chk1Ser345p↑ Chk2Thr68p↑ Masterson & O'Dea (2007)
HeLa A549 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology γH2AX foci SASP p21↑ DDR (ATM) G1 100 μm for 48 h elevated ROS levels p53 activation in A549 cells Nair et al. (2015)
 2′,2′‐difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) Inhibits ribonucleotide reductase Inhibits CTP synthetase AsPC1 PANC‐1Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑Sub‐G1100 nm for 4 daysModrak et al. (2009)
 cyclopentenyl cytosine Inhibits CTP synthetase MCF‐7Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53 p53, p21↑ G2 S 0.125–1 μm for 5 daysHuang et al. (2011)
(2) DNA‐damaging agents
(2a) DNA topoisomerases inhibitors
 doxorubicin DNA intercalator Induces DSBs by poisoning DNA topoisomerase II Induces nucleosome eviction 11 cell lines derived from different types of human solid tumorsSenescence‐like phenotype Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal Can be dependent or not on p53 activation20–50 nm for 3–6 daysChang et al. (1999a)
HCT116Senescence‐like phenotype CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21 p21↑ G2 phase 50–100 nm for 1–4 days treatment led to the appearance of a substantial fraction of polyploid nuclei in p53−/− and p21−/− lines Chang et al. (1999b)
MCF7Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53 p53, p21↑ 1 μm for 2 hElmore et al. (2002)
HCT116Senescence‐like phenotype CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53, p21↑G20.1 μM for 24 hSliwinska et al. (2009)
Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes H9c2 Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53↑ p‐p38↑ p‐JNK↑ p‐ERK↑ MAPK (p‐38 and JNK) S0.1 μm for 3 hSpallarossa et al. (2009)
WI38 Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal mTOR p53, p21↑ 100 ng mL−1 for 1–4 days low p53 levels during prolonged cell cycle arrest lead to senescence, while high levels of p53—to either quiescence or cell death Leontieva et al. (2010)
A549Transient senescence‐like state CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal G250–200 nm for 72 hLitwiniec et al. (2010)
MMTV‐Wnt1 mice MCF7Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐gal SASP p53, +/− p21 G1 (p53‐and p21‐dependent), G2 (p21‐independent) 4 mg kg−1day−1 for 5 days, MCF7 treated with 200 nm for 24 h in vivo Jackson et al. (2012)
Cardiac progenitor cells Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal γH2AX p16↑ 0.1–1 μm for 24–48 h in vivo Piegari et al. (2013)
DU145 LNCaP PC3 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p27↑ p‐Rb↓ p53‐independent G110 nm for 1–5 daysPark et al. (2006)
 etoposide Poison of DNA topoisomerase II Induces DSBs LS174T A2780 MCF7 Premature senescence Growth arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal G12 μm for 24 hte Poele et al. (2002)
WI38Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53 p‐p53↑ p21↑ G1 20 μm for 24 h H2AX phosphorylation, peaked around 8 h and completely resolved at 24 h after the treatment Probin et al. (2006)
A549Senescence‐like phenotype Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal SAHF p21↑G2 0.75–3 μm for 72 h Polyploid (higher DNA contents (>G2)) Litwiniec et al. (2013)
 daunorubicin DNA intercalator Poises topoisomerase II JurkatSenescence‐like phenotype Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑G291 nm for 24 hMansilla et al. (2003)
 mitoxantrone Topoisomerase IIβ inhibitor Induces DSBs Epithelial cells in biopsies from human prostate cancer patientsPremature senescenceSASP p21↑ p16↑ in vivo Coppe et al. (2008)
A549 WI‐38 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γ‐H2AX p21↑ p‐ATM(Ser1981)↑ G1 G2 2 nm for 2–5 daysZhao et al. (2010)
 camptothecin and SN‐38 Topoisomerase I poison Induces SSBs LS174T MCF‐7 A2780 HCT116 Senescence‐like arrest Growth arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21↑ p16↑ G1 S G2 6–100 ng mL−1 for 24–168 hte Poele et al. (2002)
HCT116Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21↑ 20 nm for 24–120 h high concentration (250 nm) of camptothecin results in apoptosis Han et al. (2002)
H1299Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal ATM/ATR G2 30–60 nm for 2–3 days p53‐, p16‐, p38‐independent Roberson et al. (2005)
HCT116Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal γH2AX ATM‐Chk2‐p53‐p21 p‐ATM↑ p‐Chk2↑ p53↑ p21↑ 20 nm for 72 hZhang et al. (2014)
HeLaSenescence‐like growth arrest Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal γH2AX p21↑G210–100 nm for 1 hVelichko et al. (2015)
(2b) DNA cross‐linkers
 cisplatin DNA‐alkylating agent Induces DNA intrastrand cross‐links CNE1Senescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal S G2 0.5 mkg mL−1 for 24 h higher doses result in cell death Wang et al. (1998)
Normal human lung fibroblastsPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology p53↑G110 μm for 24 hZhao et al. (2004)
Human non‐small cell lung cancer cellsSenescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition SA‐β‐gal p16 G25 μm for 3 daysFang et al. (2007)
HCT116Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal γH2AX foci p53↑ 5 μm for 6 h higher concentrations induce apoptosis Berndtsson et al. (2007)
HepG2Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑ 2 μg mL−1 for 48 h ROS↑‐dependent Qu et al. (2014)
CCL23 CAL27 UM‐SCC1 UM‐SCC14A Premature senescence SA‐β‐Gal increased secretion of IL‐8 p53↑ p16↑ p‐Rb↓ 6 μg mL−1 for 4 hVeena et al. (2014)
 mitomycin C DNA‐alkylating agent Induces DNA interstrand cross‐links A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γH2AX p21↑G20.01–0.02 μg mL−1 for 6 daysMcKenna et al. (2012)
 busulfan DNA‐alkylating agent Induces DNA intrastrand cross‐link Murine bone marrow cellsPremature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p16↑ p19↑ 30 μm for 6 hMeng et al. (2003)
WI38Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal MAPK(p38, ERK) p‐p38↑ p‐JNK↑ p‐ERK↑ p21↑ p16↑ G27.5–120 μm for 24 hProbin et al., 2006, 2007
 cyclophosphamide DNA‐alkylating agent Induces DNA intrastrand and interstrand cross‐links Lymphoma‐bearing C57BL/6 micePremature senescenceSA‐β‐gal  p53↑ p16↑ 300 mg kg−1 day−1 for 7 days in vivo Schmitt et al. (2002)
TIG‐7Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐gal MAPK (p‐p38, p‐JNK, p‐ERK)↑ p21↑ p16↑ G1 G2 10 μm for 14 daysPalaniyappan (2009)
 diaziquone DNA‐alkylating agent Induces DNA–DNA and DNA–RNA interstrand cross‐links DU145Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal 0.25–10 μm for 3 daysEwald et al. (2009)
(2c) DNA‐damaging drugs with complex effects
 actinomycin D DNA intercalator Inhibits transcription Can poison topoisomerases I and II, and, thus induce SSBs and DSBs Normal human fibroblastsPremature senescenceGrowth inhibitionp53‐p21↑ G1 G2 0.04 mg mL−1 for 12 hRobles and Adami (1998)
Human mesenchymal stem cellsPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γ‐H2AX foci SASP p53‐p21↑ p16↑ 400 mm for 3–21 daysMinieri et al. (2015)
 bleomycin Induces DNA breaks Normal human fibroblastsPremature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21↑ p16↑ G1 G2 0.06 units mL−1 for 12–24 hRobles and Adami (1998)
A549 Rat primary type II cells C57BL/6J mice Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p21↑ 50 μg mL−1 for 120 h or 5 mg kg−1 day−1 for 7–21 days in vivo Aoshiba et al. (2003)
A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p53‐p21↑G2 50 mU mL−1 for 1–7 days siRNA for caveolin‐1 reduces SA‐β‐gal Linge et al. (2007)
BJ 293T Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal SASP 100 μg mL−1 for 24 hPazolli et al. (2012)
C57BL/6J micePremature senescence γH2AX p‐53BP1 SASP p21↑ p‐ATM/ATR↑ p‐p38↑ 2.5 mg kg−1 day−1 for 7–21 days in vivo Aoshiba et al. (2013)
 temozolomide DNA‐alkylating agent Alkylates/methylates DNA Induces DNA damage U‐87 MGPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑, p21↑G2 100 μm for 3 h the gradual appearance of hyperploid cells Hirose et al. (2001)
Me4405 IR3 Mel‐CV MM200 SK‐mel‐28 Mel‐FH Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑, p21↑G2 25–100 μm for 72 h the gradual appearance of hyperploid cells Mhaidat et al. (2007)
(3) Epigenetic modifiers
 5‐aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine Inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases Induces DSBs MDAH041Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p16↑S1 μm for 6 daysVogt et al. (1998)
HepG2 NMRI mice Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal γ‐H2AX accumulation of H3K9me3 SASP p53 p16↑ 20–50 μm for 96 h or 0.8 mg kg−1 day−1 for 3 days in vivo Venturelli et al. (2013)
U2OSPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p21↑ p16 ↑ 5–10 μm for 2–4 daysWidodo et al. (2007)
H28Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p27↑ ATM, ATR↑ 0.1–10 μm for 2–6 daysAmatori et al. (2011)
 sodium butyrate Class I and II histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor WI38Senescence‐like state Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p‐ Rb ↓G10.5 mm for ~20 daysOgryzko et al. (1996)
NIH3T3Senescence‐like stateCS‐like morphologyp21↑G1 5–10 mm for 48 h activation of p21 expression may be both p53‐dependent and p53‐independent Xiao et al. (1997)
HHUA Hec1‐A SKOV‐3 HeLa SiHa Senescence‐like stateSA‐β‐gal p21↑ p‐Rb↓ G1 G2 1–4 mm for 2–5 days activation of p21 expression may be both p53‐dependent and p53‐independent Terao et al. (2001)
WI‐38Senescence‐like state CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p21↑4 mM for 24 h or 0.5 mM for 14 daysPlace et al. (2005)
E1A + Ras‐transfected rat and mouse embryonic fibroblastsPremature senescenceγ‐H2AX p21↑ p16↑ G1 4 mM for 24–72 h DDR without detectable DNA damage Abramova et al. (2006), Pospelova et al. (2009)
BJ 293T Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SASP p53‐ and RB‐independent 4 mM for 3‐6 days SASP dependent upon ATM and NF‐κB Pazolli et al. (2012)
 trichostatin A Class I and II HDAC inhibitor WI38Senescence‐like stateGrowth inhibitionG1 phase10 ng mL−1 for ~30 daysOgryzko et al. (1996)
WI‐38Senescence‐like state CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p21↑2 μm for 24–72 h or 0.5 μm for 9 daysPlace et al. (2005)
BJ 293T Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal SASP p53‐ and RB‐independent 1 mM for 3 days lack of DNA damage Pazolli et al. (2012)
A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology p21↑ p27↑ G1 G2 0.5–1.0 μm for 48 hZhao et al. (2010)
 MS‐275 Class I HDAC inhibitor Mesenchymal stem cellsPremature senescenceSA‐β‐galp16↑Predominantly G21 μm for 72 hDi Bernardo et al. (2009)
 SAHA (vorinostat) Class I and II HDAC inhibitor HCT116Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐ and p21‐independent G1 G2 0.4–1 μm for 5 days induced polyploid cells Xu et al. (2005)
 LBH589 (panobinostat) Class I and II HDAC inhibitor B143 MG‐63 Saos‐2 SJSA U2OS human osteosarcoma cell lines Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal SASP p53‐independentG1 15 nm for 21 days aysor 2–10 mg kg−1 day−1 for 17 days in vivo (mice) Cain et al. (2013)
 4‐phenylbutyric acid Class I and IIa HDAC inhibitor MCF7 HT1080 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal Akt‐p21↑ 200–500 μm for 6 daysKim et al. (2012)
 valproic acid Class I and IIa HDAC inhibitor D283‐Med DAOY PFSK Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑G1 0.6–1 mm for 3–7 days or 400 mg kg−1 day−1 for 28 days in vivo Li et al. (2005)
Bel‐7402 Bel‐7404 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑, pRb↓G10.2–0.5 mm for 2–5 daysAn et al. (2013)
 curcumin and C646 p300 histone acetyltransferase inhibitors TIG3Senescence‐like state SA‐β‐gal SAHF p53‐, p21‐ and p16‐independentG2 6–9 μm for 2–15 days Global H3, H4 hypoacetylation Lack of DNA damage Prieur et al. (2011)
HCT116 MCF 7 U2OS Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p21↑ p53‐independent G210 μm (HCT116) or 15 μm (MCF 7) or 7.5 μm (U2OS) for 24 hMosieniak et al. (2012)
CAF myofibroblastsPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal p16↑ p53↑ p21↑ 10 μm for 24 hHendrayani et al. (2013)
VSMC endothelial cells derived from aortaPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐gal SASP p21↑ p16↑ p‐p53Ser15↑ p‐p38↑ G2 5–7.5 μm (VSMCs) and 2.5–5 μm (endothelial cells) for 3–7 days ROS‐ and ATM‐independent Grabowska et al. (2015)
 BRD4770 G9a histone methyltransferase inhibitor PANC‐1Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p‐ATM↑G210 μm for 24 hYuan et al. (2012)
(4) Inhibitors of telomerase activity
 SYUIQ‐5 Stabilizes G‐quadruplexes Induces TRF2 delocalization from telomeres K562 SW620 Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p16↑ p21↑ p27↑ 0.2–0.4 μm for 16–35 daysZhou et al. (2006)
 BMVC4 Stabilizes G‐quadruplexes H1299 MCF7 HeLa VA13 SaoS2 U2OS Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal SAHF (H3K9me3) γ‐H2AX foci p‐ATM↑ p‐Rb↓ S1–10 μm for 9–12 daysHuang et al. (2012)
 pyridostatin Stabilizes G‐quadruplexes HT1080Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal 0.3–40 μm for 8 daysMuller et al. (2012)
 compound 115405 G‐quadruplex ligand A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 0.4 μm for ~40 daysRiou et al. (2002)
 perylene derivatives PM2 and PIPER Induce G‐quadruplex formation from both telomeric DNA and hTERT promoter region A549Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 0.4–0.8 μm for 24–78 daysTaka et al. (2013)
 harmine β‐carboline alkaloid MCF7Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γ‐H2AX p53‐p21↑20–30 μm for 48–96 hZhao and Wink (2013)
 indole derivatives (indole‐3‐carbinol (I3C) and indoxyl sulfate) Phytochemicals that downregulate hTERT expression MCF7Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal G1200 μm for 48 hMarconett et al. (2011)
HK‐2 CRF rats Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p‐p53Ser15↑ 250 μm for 48–120 h or 4 g kg−1 for 16 weeks in vivo Shimizu et al. (2010)
HK‐2Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal NF‐κB↑ 250 μm for 48–72 h ROS↑ Shimizu et al. (2011)
 BIBR1532 Non‐nucleosidic TERT inhibitor NCI‐H460Senescence‐like phenotype Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 10 mm for 130 daysDamm et al. (2001)
 azidothymidine (AZT) Reverse transcriptase inhibitor Inhibits telomerase activity MCF‐7Senescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal 20 and 70 μm for ~ 50–60 population doublings (PD)Ji et al. (2005)
HTLV‐I ATL patients Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p21↑ p27↑ 50 μm for 18 weeks in vivo (ATL patients) the Jurkat T‐cell line, treated under the same conditions, did not enter growth arrest Datta et al. (2006)
MASC C57BL/6 mice Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal 30 μm for 48 h or 100 mg kg−1 day−1 for 2 weeks in vivo Demir and Laywell (2015)
(5) cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors
 palbociclib (PD‐0332991) CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors HT1080 MEL10 RPE Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal mTOR pRb↓ 0.5 μm for 3–7 daysLeontieva and Blagosklonny (2013)
MEL 10 RPE Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal mTOR, MEK 1 μm for 5 daysLeontieva et al. (2013)
12 sarcoma cell lines generated directly from patient samplesPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 53BP1 foci pRb↓G1 9–27 μm for 2–4 days or 100 mg kg−1 day−1 for 3 weeks in vivo (mice) Perez et al. (2015)
MCF7Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal G1 1 μm for 5–7 days, 0.6 or 3.0 mg kg−1 day for 10 cycles each consisting of 3 weeks in vivo (dogs) Hu et al. (2015)
1205Lu WM983 WM983BR WM451Lu WM239A WM3918 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal SASP SAHF pRb↓ mTOR↓ G1 1 μm for 8 days or 90 mg kg−1 day for 14 days in vivo (mice) Yoshida et al. (2016)
roscovitinE (seliciclib) CDK2, CDK7, and CDK9 inhibitors RTE MDCK WT 9‐7 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑1–10 μg mL−1 for 24 hPark et al. (2009)
ribociclib (LEE011) CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors Human neuroblastoma‐derived cellsPremature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p‐Rb↓G1 500 nm for 6 days or 200 mg kg−1 for 21 days in vivo (mice) Rader et al. (2013)
(6) p53 activators
 nutlin‐3a Inhibits MDM2 binding to p53 MEF oncogenically transformed MEF murine fibrosarcoma cell linesPremature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ 5 or 10 μm for 1–7 days no apoptosis was observedEfeyan et al. (2007)
MCF‐7Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53 G1 G2 10 μm for 5 daysHuang et al. (2011)
MyLa2000 Mac1 Mac2a Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p21↑ G12.5–10 μm for 24–72 h induces apoptosisManfe et al. (2012)
 FL118 Camptothecin analogue Induces proteasomal degradation of MdmX HCT116 HCT8 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p21↑ 10 nm for 3 daysLing et al. (2014)
(7) activators of protein kinase C (PKC)
 TPA/PMA (12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate/(phorbol‐12‐myristate‐13‐acetate) Activates PKC Induces DNA damage D04 D08 MM127 MM455 Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ ERK↑ p‐Rb↓ G1 0.1–1 μg mL−1 for 24 h telomerase was selectively repressed; normal human fibroblasts were resistant to treatment Cozzi et al. (2006)
H358 H441 H322 Premature senescence Growth inhibition CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ pRb↓ G2100 nm for 30 min reduced telomerase activityOliva et al. (2008)
SK‐MEL‐5 MCF7 COLO‐205 Senescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ ERK1/2↑ p‐Rb↓ G210‐1000 ng mL−1 for 24 hMason et al. (2010)
 PEP005 (ingenol‐3‐angelate) Activates PKC D04 D08 MM127 MM455 Premature senescence Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ ERK↑ G10.2–1 μg mL−1 for 24 h telomerase was selectively repressed normal human fibroblasts were resistant to treatmentCozzi et al. (2006)
PEP008 (20‐O‐acetylingenol‐3‐angelate) SK‐MEL‐5 MCF7 COLO‐205 Senescence‐like arrest Growth inhibition SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ ERK1↑ p‐Rb ↓ G210–1000 ng mL−1 for 24 h or 5–6 daysMason et al. (2010)
(8) ROS inducers
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)F65Senescence‐like arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 200 μm for 2 hChen and Ames (1994)
IMR‐90Senescence‐like arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑ p‐Rb↓ G1300 μm for 2 hChen et al. (1998)
IMR‐90Senescence‐like arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p‐p38↑ p‐Rb↓ 150 μm for 2 hFrippiat et al. (2002)
2BSPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑G110 μm for 3 weeks accumulation of DNA damage accelerated telomere shorteningDuan et al. (2005)
A549Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑ p‐Rb↓ 100 μm for 2 hYoshizaki et al. (2009)
Primary human keratinocytesPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑50 μm for 2 hIdo et al. (2012)
HUVECPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal SASP p53‐p21↑100 μm for 1 hSuzuki et al. (2013)
hMESCsPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal γH2A.X and p‐53BP1 foci p‐p38↑ p53‐p21↑ p‐Rb↓ G1200 μm for 1 hBurova et al. (2013), Borodkina et al. (2014)
WI‐38 IMR‐90 LF1 HCA2 Premature senescenceSA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p‐Rb↓ 500 μm for 2 hGorbunova et al. (2002)
IMR‐90Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p‐ERK↑ p‐Akt↑ 150 μm for 2 h caveolin 1↑Chretien et al. (2008)
IMR‐90Premature senescenceSA‐β‐Gal p‐p38↑ p21↑ 200 μm for 2 hZdanov et al. (2006)
HUVECPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑100 μm for 1 hOta et al. (2008)
MRC‐5Premature senescencevon Zglinicki et al. (2000)
 tertbutyl hydroperoxide (tBHP)WI‐38Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p‐Rb↓ 5 × 30 μm for 1 h day−1 Dumont et al. (2000)
HUVECPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 100 μm for 2 daysKurz et al. (2004)
WI‐38Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal SASP 5 × 30 μm for 1 h day−1 Pascal et al. (2007)
WI‐38Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p21↑ p16↑ G14 × 100 μm for 1 h per every two doublingChen et al. (2008)
Human mesangial cellsPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal JAK2‐STAT↑ G130 μm for 1 hZhou et al. (2013)
phenyl‐2‐pyridyl ketoxime (PPKO)Primary human fibroblasts were isolated from newborn foreskinsSenescence‐like arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53‐p21↑ p16↑ ERK1/ERK2↑ ROS‐ and NO↑‐dependent G21 mm for 3 daysYang et al. (2016)
phenylaminonaphthoquinones (Q7 and Q9)T24Senescence‐like arrest CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal MAPK p53‐p21↑ p27↑ G24 μm for 1–3 days alone or with 1 mM ascorbateFelipe et al. (2013)
paraquat TIG‐7Premature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal 100 μm for 4 daysJoguchi et al. (2004)
BALB/c micePremature senescenceSA‐β‐Gal25 mg kg−1 for 3 days (intraperitoneal injection)Ota et al. (2008)
BJPremature senescence CS‐like morphology SA‐β‐Gal p53↑ p16↑ 350 μm for 16 h thioredoxin 1↑Young et al. (2010)

Cell lines: 1205Lu, human lung melanoma cells; 2BS, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; A2780, human ovarian carcinoma cells; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells; AsPC1, human pancreas adenocarcinoma cells; B143, human osteosarcoma cells; Bel‐7402, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; Bel‐7404, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; BJ, normal human foreskin fibroblasts; CAF, cancer‐associated fibroblasts; CAL27, human oral adenosquamous carcinoma cells; CNE1, human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells; D283‐Med, human medulloblastoma cells; DAOY, human cerebellar medulloblastoma cells; DU145, human prostate carcinoma cells; F65, human foreskin fibroblasts; H1299, human lung carcinoma cells; H28, human mesothelioma cells; H9c2, rat cardiomyoblast cells; HCA2, normal human foreskin fibroblasts; HCT116, human colorectal carcinoma cells; HCT8, human ileocecal colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; Hec1‐A, human uterus/endometrium adenocarcinoma cells; HeLa, human cervix adenocarcinoma cells; HepG2, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; HFF, human foreskin normal fibroblasts; HHUA, human endometrial cells; HK‐2, human renal proximal tubule cells; hMESCs, human endometrium‐derived mesenchymal stem cells; HT1080, human connective tissue fibrosarcoma cells; HTLV‐I, human T‐cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV‐I)‐infected cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IMR‐90, human fetal lung fibroblasts; Jurkat, human T‐cell leukemia cells; K562, human bone marrow myelogenous leukemia lymphoblasts; LF1, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; LNCaP, human prostate carcinoma cells; LS174T, human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; Mac1, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); Mac2a, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); MASC, mouse multipotent astrocytic stem cell; McA‐RH7777, rat hepatoma cells; MCF10, human breast fibrocystic cells; MCF7, human breast adenocarcinoma cells; MDAH041, derivate from the fibroblasts of a patient with Li–Fraumeni syndrome; MDCK, canine epithelial kidney cells; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; MEL10 (SK‐MEL‐147), human melanoma cells; MG‐63, human osteosarcoma cells; MRC‐5, human lung fibroblast; MyLa2000, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); NCI‐H460, human lung carcinoma cells; NIH3T3, mouse embryo fibroblasts; PANC‐1, human pancreatic carcinoma cells; PC‐3, human prostate cancer cells; PFSK‐1, human neuroectodermal cells derived from cerebral brain tumor; REF52, rat embryonic fibroblasts; RPE, human retinal pigment epithelial cells; RTE, rat tracheal epithelial cells; Saos‐2, human osteosarcoma cells; SiHa, human cervix squamous cell carcinoma cells; SJSA‐1, human osteosarcoma cells; SKN‐SH, human neuroblastoma cells; SKOV‐3, human ovary adenocarcinoma cells; SW620, human colon cancer cells; T24, human bladder carcinoma cells; TIG‐3, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; TIG‐7, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; U2OS, human osteosarcoma cells; U‐87 MG, human glioblastoma, astrocytoma cells; UM‐SCC1, human squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity cells; UM‐SCC14A, human squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity cells; VA‐13, human lung fibroblasts; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells; WI38, human lung fibroblasts; WM239A, human melanoma cells; WM3918, human melanoma cells; WM451Lu, human melanoma cells; WM983, human melanoma cells; WM983BR, human melanoma cells; WT 9‐7, human cells from a patient with autosomal‐dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD).

Abbreviations: CS, cellular senescence; DSBs, double‐stranded DNA breaks; SA‐β‐gal, senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase; SAHF, senescence‐associated heterochromatin foci; SASP, senescence‐associated secretory phenotype; SSBs, single‐stranded DNA breaks.

Symbols: ↑, increased activity/expression reported; ↓, decreased activity/expression reported; ▼, involvement of the protein/pathway was verified by gene(s) knockout or knockdown, inhibitory analysis, and/or using cell lines carrying inactivating mutations.

Low molecular weight compounds that induce cellular senescence Cell lines: 1205Lu, human lung melanoma cells; 2BS, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; A2780, human ovarian carcinoma cells; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cells; AsPC1, human pancreas adenocarcinoma cells; B143, human osteosarcoma cells; Bel‐7402, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; Bel‐7404, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; BJ, normal human foreskin fibroblasts; CAF, cancer‐associated fibroblasts; CAL27, human oral adenosquamous carcinoma cells; CNE1, human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells; D283‐Med, human medulloblastoma cells; DAOY, human cerebellar medulloblastoma cells; DU145, human prostate carcinoma cells; F65, human foreskin fibroblasts; H1299, human lung carcinoma cells; H28, human mesothelioma cells; H9c2, rat cardiomyoblast cells; HCA2, normal human foreskin fibroblasts; HCT116, human colorectal carcinoma cells; HCT8, human ileocecal colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; Hec1‐A, human uterus/endometrium adenocarcinoma cells; HeLa, human cervix adenocarcinoma cells; HepG2, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells; HFF, human foreskin normal fibroblasts; HHUA, human endometrial cells; HK‐2, human renal proximal tubule cells; hMESCs, human endometrium‐derived mesenchymal stem cells; HT1080, human connective tissue fibrosarcoma cells; HTLV‐I, human T‐cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV‐I)‐infected cells; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IMR‐90, human fetal lung fibroblasts; Jurkat, human T‐cell leukemia cells; K562, human bone marrow myelogenous leukemia lymphoblasts; LF1, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; LNCaP, human prostate carcinoma cells; LS174T, human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; Mac1, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); Mac2a, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); MASC, mouse multipotent astrocytic stem cell; McA‐RH7777, rat hepatoma cells; MCF10, human breast fibrocystic cells; MCF7, human breast adenocarcinoma cells; MDAH041, derivate from the fibroblasts of a patient with Li–Fraumeni syndrome; MDCK, canine epithelial kidney cells; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; MEL10 (SK‐MEL‐147), human melanoma cells; MG‐63, human osteosarcoma cells; MRC‐5, human lung fibroblast; MyLa2000, human cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (CTCL); NCI‐H460, human lung carcinoma cells; NIH3T3, mouse embryo fibroblasts; PANC‐1, human pancreatic carcinoma cells; PC‐3, human prostate cancer cells; PFSK‐1, human neuroectodermal cells derived from cerebral brain tumor; REF52, rat embryonic fibroblasts; RPE, human retinal pigment epithelial cells; RTE, rat tracheal epithelial cells; Saos‐2, human osteosarcoma cells; SiHa, human cervix squamous cell carcinoma cells; SJSA‐1, human osteosarcoma cells; SKN‐SH, human neuroblastoma cells; SKOV‐3, human ovary adenocarcinoma cells; SW620, human colon cancer cells; T24, human bladder carcinoma cells; TIG‐3, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; TIG‐7, human embryonic lung fibroblasts; U2OS, human osteosarcoma cells; U‐87 MG, human glioblastoma, astrocytoma cells; UM‐SCC1, human squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity cells; UM‐SCC14A, human squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity cells; VA‐13, human lung fibroblasts; VSMC, vascular smooth muscle cells; WI38, human lung fibroblasts; WM239A, human melanoma cells; WM3918, human melanoma cells; WM451Lu, human melanoma cells; WM983, human melanoma cells; WM983BR, human melanoma cells; WT 9‐7, human cells from a patient with autosomal‐dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Abbreviations: CS, cellular senescence; DSBs, double‐stranded DNA breaks; SA‐β‐gal, senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase; SAHF, senescence‐associated heterochromatin foci; SASP, senescence‐associated secretory phenotype; SSBs, single‐stranded DNA breaks. Symbols: ↑, increased activity/expression reported; ↓, decreased activity/expression reported; ▼, involvement of the protein/pathway was verified by gene(s) knockout or knockdown, inhibitory analysis, and/or using cell lines carrying inactivating mutations. The table highlights the fact that cancer cells can undergo cellular senescence in vitro just as well as their normal nontransformed counterparts. It is apparent that there is no senescence marker or pathway unique to normal or cancer cells. In most cases, increased SA‐β‐gal, morphological changes, and persistent DDR foci were recorded. SAHF were found in only a few cases (aphidicolin, etoposide, palbociclib, and epigenetic modifiers). SASP was also noted only in some cases; however, this is likely because SASP is not commonly analyzed as a senescence biomarker. Apparently, an implicit consensus was established that the demonstration of SA‐β‐gal, morphological changes, and persistent DDR is sufficient to document a cellular senescence‐like state. It is notable that authors designated these phenotypes as a state of premature senescence or senescence‐like cell cycle arrest, regardless of the set of biomarkers observed in each case. Extremely prolonged drug exposure (from hours to days) was typically required to induce cellular senescence, as is evidenced by the table. In marginal situations, as in the case of aphidicolin‐induced cell cycle arrest, the full set of senescence biomarkers (SA‐β‐gal, cell enlargement, SAHF, and DDR foci) was maintained, while the drug was present in the culture medium and lost upon drug removal (Maya‐Mendoza et al., 2014). The requirement for prolonged incubation time was found for all groups of chemical compounds analyzed; however, the mechanism of senescence development appeared to differ among these groups. Whereas replication stress inducers, different DNA‐damaging agents, and telomerase inhibitors likely generate a persistent DDR following prolonged introduction of a small number of DNA lesions or telomere uncapping, long‐term incubation with epigenetic modifiers likely causes transcriptional activation of repressed loci (particularly INK4A, which encodes p16 CDK inhibitor). This hypothesis is supported by the fact that, in contrast to DNA damage‐induced cellular senescence, which depends on p21 CDK inhibitor, epigenetically induced senescence is mostly dependent on p16. This characterizes epigenetically induced senescence as ‘causeless’—epigenetic modifiers directly activate molecular pathways maintaining the cellular senescence state without generating any cell stress. In this regard, senescence induced by epigenetic modifiers can resemble developmentally programmed or organismal aging‐associated cellular senescence, while replication stress‐ and DNA damage‐induced senescence are examples of stress‐induced premature senescence states. It follows from the table that replication stress‐ and DNA damage‐induced cellular senescence mostly depend on the p53p21 pathway. The same is basically true for cellular senescence induced by physical stressors such as ionizing radiation (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) (Latonen et al., 2001; Suzuki et al., 2006). It is well known that IR as well as UV can stimulate senescence in a variety of normal and cancer cell lines (Chainiaux et al., 2002; Meng et al., 2003; Jones et al., 2005; Jee et al., 2009). Mechanistically, this type of cellular senescence mostly depends on DNA damage induced by these stressors; this links IR and UV to chemical DNA‐damaging agents. Moreover, IR and UV, along with most of the DNA‐damaging agents presented in the table, induce apoptosis rather than senescence when used at higher doses. These observations further emphasize the relationship between apoptosis and senescence. Accordingly, these cell stress response pathways may operate either as alternatives or as supplement to each other. While prominent (but short term) DNA damage induces apoptosis, prolonged mild DNA damage activates cellular senescence. The p53 transcription factor emerges as a master regulator controlling these cell fate decisions (Purvis et al., 2012).

Funding

This work was supported by a Russian Science Foundation [grant number 14‐24‐00022].

Conflict of interest

None declared.
  169 in total

1.  Accumulation of single-strand breaks is the major cause of telomere shortening in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  T von Zglinicki; R Pilger; N Sitte
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  5-Bromodeoxyuridine induces senescence-like phenomena in mammalian cells regardless of cell type or species.

Authors:  E Michishita; K Nakabayashi; T Suzuki; S C Kaul; H Ogino; M Fujii; Y Mitsui; D Ayusawa
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Role of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 in senescence-like terminal proliferation arrest induced in human tumor cells by chemotherapeutic drugs.

Authors:  B D Chang; Y Xuan; E V Broude; H Zhu; B Schott; J Fang; I B Roninson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  A senescence-like phenotype distinguishes tumor cells that undergo terminal proliferation arrest after exposure to anticancer agents.

Authors:  B D Chang; E V Broude; M Dokmanovic; H Zhu; A Ruth; Y Xuan; E S Kandel; E Lausch; K Christov; I B Roninson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Senescence-like changes induced by hydroxyurea in human diploid fibroblasts.

Authors:  E J Yeo; Y C Hwang; C M Kang; I H Kim; D I Kim; J S Parka; H E Choy; W Y Park; S C Park
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Normal human mammary epithelial cells spontaneously escape senescence and acquire genomic changes.

Authors:  S R Romanov; B K Kozakiewicz; C R Holst; M R Stampfer; L M Haupt; T D Tlsty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Ras proteins induce senescence by altering the intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  A C Lee; B E Fenster; H Ito; K Takeda; N S Bae; T Hirai; Z X Yu; V J Ferrans; B H Howard; T Finkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Hydroxyurea induces a senescence-like change of K562 human erythroleukemia cell.

Authors:  J I Park; J S Jeong; J Y Han; D I Kim; Y H Gao; S C Park; G P Rodgers; I H Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) of human diploid fibroblasts and melanocytes.

Authors:  O Toussaint; E E Medrano; T von Zglinicki
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.032

10.  Induction of replicative senescence biomarkers by sublethal oxidative stresses in normal human fibroblast.

Authors:  P Dumont; M Burton; Q M Chen; E S Gonos; C Frippiat; J B Mazarati; F Eliaers; J Remacle; O Toussaint
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 7.376

View more
  59 in total

1.  The power of proteomics to monitor senescence-associated secretory phenotypes and beyond: toward clinical applications.

Authors:  Nathan Basisty; Abhijit Kale; Sandip Patel; Judith Campisi; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Association between mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damages and cellular senescence in the patients with biliary atresia undergoing Kasai portoenterostomy and liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yudai Nakajima; Yuto Yamazaki; Xin Gao; Masatoshi Hashimoto; Masaki Nio; Motoshi Wada; Fumiyoshi Fujishima; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Approaches and Protocols to Analyze Autophagy and Its Role in Death of Apoptosis-Resistant Senescent Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Elena Y Kochetkova; Valery A Pospelov; Tatiana V Pospelova
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Podocyte Aging: Why and How Getting Old Matters.

Authors:  Stuart J Shankland; Yuliang Wang; Andrey S Shaw; Joshua C Vaughan; Jeffrey W Pippin; Oliver Wessely
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  SerpinB2 Regulates Immune Response in Kidney Injury and Aging.

Authors:  Payel Sen; Alexandra Helmke; Chieh Ming Liao; Inga Sörensen-Zender; Song Rong; Jan-Hinrich Bräsen; Anette Melk; Hermann Haller; Sibylle von Vietinghoff; Roland Schmitt
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Chromatin-Directed Proteomics Identifies ZNF84 as a p53-Independent Regulator of p21 in Genotoxic Stress Response.

Authors:  Anna Strzeszewska-Potyrała; Karolina Staniak; Joanna Czarnecka-Herok; Mahmoud-Reza Rafiee; Marcin Herok; Grażyna Mosieniak; Jeroen Krijgsveld; Ewa Sikora
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Molecular Hydrogen Attenuated N-methyl-N-Nitrosourea Induced Corneal Endothelial Injury by Upregulating Anti-Apoptotic Pathway.

Authors:  Runpu Li; Yingxin Qu; Xiaoqi Li; Ye Tao; Qinghua Yang; Junyi Wang; Yumei Diao; Qian Li; Yifan Fang; Yifei Huang; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  Breast cancer type 1 and neurodegeneration: consequences of deficient DNA repair.

Authors:  Emily Leung; Lili-Naz Hazrati
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Anti-Leukemic Properties of Aplysinopsin Derivative EE-84 Alone and Combined to BH3 Mimetic A-1210477.

Authors:  Sungmi Song; Sua Kim; Eslam R El-Sawy; Claudia Cerella; Barbora Orlikova-Boyer; Gilbert Kirsch; Christo Christov; Mario Dicato; Marc Diederich
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 10.  Small-molecule drug repurposing to target DNA damage repair and response pathways.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Brinkman; Yue Liu; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 15.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.