| Literature DB >> 27626700 |
Fenggen Yan1, Fen Yang1, Rui Wang1, Xiao Jun Yao1, Liping Bai1, Xing Zeng2, JiaJun Huang1, Vincent Kam Wai Wong1, Christopher Wai Kei Lam1, Hua Zhou1, Xiaohui Su1, Juan Liu1, Ting Li1, Liang Liu1.
Abstract
The efficacious practice of precision personalized medicine requires a more exact understanding of the molecular mechanisms of drug, hence then it is necessary to identify the binding site of the drugs derived from natural sources. In the study, we investigated the suppressive effect and underlying mechanism of isoliquiritigenin (2',4',4-trihydroxychalcone; ILG), a phyto-flavonoid, on human T lymphocyte activation in vitro and in vivo. The results showed that ILG dose-dependently suppressed human T cell activation via suppressing IκBα phosphorylation and degradation, NF-κB nuclear translocation and IKKβ activity. Molecular docking results predicted that cysteine 46 (Cys-46) is probably the binding site of ILG on IKKβ, and this prediction has been validated by competition assay and kinase assay. To further verify the binding site of this compound in vivo, IKKβC46A transgenic (IKKβC46A) mice were generated. We found that ILG had a less potent immune-suppressive effect in homozygous IKKβC46A mice than IKKβ wild type (IKKβ wt) littermates with the delay-type hypersensitivity (DTH), suggesting that ILG cannot significantly suppress the inflammation due to the mutation of Cys-46 in the transgenic mice. Collectively, our findings indicate that the ILG inhibited T cell activation in vivo and in vitro via directly binding to IKKβ Cys46.Entities:
Keywords: IKKβ; T lymphocyte; cysteine 46; immune-suppression; isoliquiritigenin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27626700 PMCID: PMC5470962 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1(A) The chemical structure of isoliquiritigenin (ILG). (B) The effect of ILG on human T cell proliferation induced by PMA plus ionomycin (P/I). (C) The effect of ILG on human T cell division induced by P/I. Statistically significant differences with respect to P/I are expressed as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments.
The effect of ILG on human T cell division induced by P/I
| Measure of proliferation | Control | P/I | ILG (μM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 25 | |||
| % Divided | 0.033 ± 0.014 | 0.437 ± 0.065 | 0.319 ± 0.063 | 0.120 ± 0.019* | 0.011 ± 0.004* |
| Div. Index | 2.382 ± 1.489 | 29.770 ± 3.896 | 22.600 ± 3.470 | 9.343 ± 1.583* | 0.393 ± 0.179* |
Statistically significant differences with respect to P/I are expressed as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments
Figure 2(A–B) The effect of ILG on IFN-γ and IL-2 secretion on human T cells induced by P/I. (C) The effect of ILG on the human T cell cycle progression. Statistically significant differences compared to vehicle treatment are expressed as *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. Data represent the mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments.
Figure 3(A–C) The effect of ILG on the expression of CD69, CD25 and CD71 on human T lymphocytes induced by P/I. Values represent percentages of the double stained cells.
Figure 4(A) The effect of ILG on the nuclear translocation of NF-κB subunit p65 in human T cells stimulated by P/I. (B) The effect of ILG on degradation and phosphorylation of IκBα in human T lymphocytes stimulated by P/I. (C) The effect of ILG on IKKα/β phosphorylation and p65 phosphorylation in human T lymphocytes stimulated by P/I. (D) The effect of ILG on IKKβ activity. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 5(A) Prediction of the molecular target of ILG by computational docking. High-precision computational model was applied to predict the approach that combines two elaborately built machine learning systems and multiple molecular docking tools to assess binding potentials of ILG against IKKβ involved in a complex molecular network. (B) The effect of ILG on the activity of IKKβ C46A. (C) Competitive binding experiments are used to elucidate the binding site of ILG at IKKβ. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 6(A) The effect of ILG on the ear edema of the IKKβC46A transgenic mice and wild-type littermates with delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH). (B–C) The effect of ILG on thymus and spleen weight of DTH IKKβC46A transgenic mice and wild-type littermates. Statistically significant differences with respect to the vehicle treatment in IKKβ wt and IKKβC46A transgenic mice are expressed as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001, respectively.