Literature DB >> 27625087

Expression and Clinical Significance of Cytokeratin-19 and Thymidine Kinase-1 in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Ying-Ying Du1, Qiu-Jun Zhang1, Guo-Ping Sun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the clinical value of cytokeratin-19 (CK19) and thymidine kinase-1 (TK1) in advanced gastrointestinal cancer remains controversial, we investigated their expression and clinical significance in this disease.
METHODS: A total of 171 advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. The mRNA level of CK19 was detected using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in all patients, along with a control group of fifty healthy individuals. Furthermore, detection of TK1 protein was carried out in 96 patients using a chemiluminescence dot blot assay. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) time.
RESULTS: Positive CK19 mRNA expression was detected in 74 (43.3%) of the 171 patients and positive TK1 expression was detected in 66 (68.8%) of the 96 patients. Furthermore, of the 96 patients, 36 (37.5%) were positive for both TK1 protein and CK19 mRNA, 30 (31.3%) were negative for TK1 protein, and 15 (15.6%) were negative for TK1 protein and positive for CK19 mRNA. The results indicated that patients who were positive for CK19 mRNA expression had significantly shorter OS times than those who were negative for it (median OS 7.7 vs. 9.7 months, respectively; P = 0.02). Moreover, patients who were positive for CK19 mRNA and TK1 protein expression had shorter OS times (median OS 6.1 months) than those who were positive for CK19 mRNA and negative for TK1 protein expression (median OS 9.1 months; P = 0.028). Positive CK19 mRNA expression was significantly associated with shorter OS in the univariate analysis (P = 0.027). Based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis, CK19 mRNA together with TK1 protein expression (P = 0.024) was an independent predictor for OS in gastrointestinal cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that positive expression of CK19 mRNA and TK1 protein is closely correlated with poor prognosis in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Furthermore, both CK19 and TK1 are possible gastrointestinal cancer biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27625087      PMCID: PMC5022336          DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.189919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal cancer is a common digestive system tumor, accounting for 30% of the global incidence and 40% of the global malignant tumor mortality.[1] Tumor recurrence and metastases are still the major causes of disease development and death.[2] Therefore, prognostic and predictive factors are urgently needed for a better-personalized treatment. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) play an important role in the initial stage of cancer metastasis. CTCs can be released from a primary site through the bloodstream to the distant organs, contributing to metastasis.[3] Previous studies reported that the presence of CTCs was directly related to the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer.[456] The detection of CTCs in the blood requires highly sensitive, specific, and reproducible methods. To date, several methods including immunocytochemistry, real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and flow cytometry have been used for the detection of these rare CTCs in the peripheral blood.[7] Cytokeratin-19 (CK19) is a cytoskeletal protein that is expressed on epithelial but not on mesenchymal cells.[8910] It is the most commonly used marker for CTCs.[1112] To the best of our knowledge, not all CTCs arrive at a secondary site and develop into metastases.[131415] If CTCs proliferate, it is likely that they will develop into metastases, but if they do not, they are cleared from the blood, cannot be detected, and will not develop into metastases. Thymidine kinase-1 (TK1) is internationally recognized as a marker of abnormal cell proliferation, which enables the dynamic monitoring of the proliferation of cancer cells and can indicate tumor recurrence and metastasis.[16] TK1 is usually detected using a chemiluminescence dot blot assay.[16] To the best of our knowledge, rare studies have yet reported on the expression of both CK19 and TK1 in gastrointestinal cancer. In the present study, we used quantitative real-time PCR and chemiluminescence dot blot assay methods to specifically quantify the expression levels of CK19 and TK1, respectively, in the peripheral blood, and followed up patients with recurrence and death, to explore the clinical value and application of CK19 and TK1 as prognostic indicators of gastrointestinal cancer.

METHODS

Patients

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. A total of 171 patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer attending the Department of Oncology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from May 2013 to January 2014 were enrolled in this study. None of the patients had received any treatment before the sample collection, including surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy. All cases were pathologically confirmed as gastrointestinal cancer, and no patients had a history of any other type of cancers. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. There were 112 male and 59 female patients with a mean age of 59 years (range: 23–86 years). The gastrointestinal cancer specimens originated from esophageal cancer (n = 23), gastric cancer (n = 90), colorectal cancer (n = 31), and rectal cancer (n = 27). A total of fifty healthy people without a history of other systemic diseases, consisting of graduate students and staff of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, served as controls.
Table 1

Characteristics of enrolled patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer

CharacteristicsAll patients (n = 171)CK19 mRNA positive (n = 74)
Age (years), median (range)59 (23–86)61 (25–86)
Gender, n (%)
 Male112 (65.9)30 (26.8)
 Female59 (34.5)44 (74.6)
Metastatic site, n (%)
 1–2147 (86.0)62 (42.2)
 3–424 (14.0)12 (50.0)
Differentiation, n (%)
 Well56 (32.8)21 (37.5)
 Moderate83 (48.5)37 (44.6)
 Poor32 (18.7)13 (40.6)
Classification of diseases, n (%)
 Esophageal cancer23 (13.5)9 (39.1)
 Gastric cancer90 (52.6)36 (40.0)
 Colorectal cancer31 (18.1)16 (51.6)
 Rectal cancer27 (15.8)13 (48.1)

CK19: Cytokeratin 19

Characteristics of enrolled patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer CK19: Cytokeratin 19

Collection of serum samples

Pretreatment fasting blood samples were collected from the peripheral vein into ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-containing tubes. The first 3 ml of blood was discarded to prevent the epidermal contamination. Sample processing was performed within 1 h of blood withdrawal. Blood was transferred into a 10 ml centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 10,000 ×g at room temperature for 10 min. The plasma was removed, and the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) fraction was stored at −80°C for future use.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

CK19 mRNA levels were detected in all patients and healthy controls. The CK19 mRNA assay was performed using a nucleic acid detection kit, based on the PCR fluorescence probe method (Pu Yuan Biotech Ltd., Anhui, China). Total RNA from the PBMC fraction was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The RNA was pretreated with RNAase-free DNase and 2 μg of RNA from each sample was used for cDNA synthesis with random hexamers. cDNA synthesis was carried out as described previously.[17] The PCR assay conditions and the primers for CK19 have also been described in detail previously.[18] All samples were measured in triplicate. The following primers were used: CK19, forward: 5′-GAA ATC AGT ACG CTG AGG GG-3′ and reverse: 5′-CCG GCT GGT GAA CCA GGC TT-3′ and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, forward: 5′-GAA GGT GAA GGT CGG AGT CA-3′ and reverse: 5′-TTG AGG TCA ATG AAG GGG TC-3′. PCR reactions were performed in an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Perkin Elmer/Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). PCR amplifications were performed in a total volume of 50 μl consisting of 5 μl of template cDNA and 15 μl of PCR master mixture containing Tag DNA polymerase, dNTP mixture, and reaction buffer. Cycling conditions were 5 min at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 45 cycles of 15 s at 95°C for denaturation, 60 s at 60°C for combined annealing, and 15 s at 72°C for primer extension. The cutoff level of CK19 mRNA copies was set at 102 copies/ml.

Thymidine kinase-1 assay

TK1 protein levels were detected in 96 patients (some of the patients refused to have the test) and the healthy controls. The TK1 assay was performed using a commercial kit, based on an enhanced chemiluminescence dot blot assay (Huarui Tongkang Bio-Tech Ltd., Shenzhen, China).[19] Briefly, 3 μl of serum was directly applied onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The serum samples were probed with human anti-TK1 chicken immunoglobulin Y antibody. Varying concentrations of TK1-peptide (20.0, 6.6 and 2.2 pmol/L) were used as an extrapolation standard. The spot intensities on the membrane were determined using a CIS-l Imaging System (Huarui Tongkang Bio-Tech Ltd., Shenzhen, China). From the intensities of the TK1 standard, the TK1 concentrations were calculated and expressed as pmol/L. The coefficient of variation was <10%. The threshold value of TK1 was set at 2.0 pmol/L. TK1 values of <2.0 pmol/L were defined as negative and considered as a lower risk for developing malignancy. TK1 values of >2.0 pmol/L were defined as positive and likely to represent individuals with an increased risk of premalignancy/malignancy progression.

Follow-up

The follow-up information was obtained from the medical records of the clinic and by telephone or written contact with the patients. The follow-up period was from the date of diagnosis to death or the last follow-up contact. The follow-up investigation was closed on January 10, 2015.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Differences in expression of CK19 mRNA and TK1 protein according to different clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were examined using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Expression of cytokeratin-19 mRNA and thymidine kinase-1 protein in gastrointestinal cancer

We first examined expression levels of CK19 mRNA in 171 patients with gastrointestinal cancer by real-time PCR. Seventy four (43.3%) of the 171 patients were found to be positive for CK19 mRNA. None of the fifty healthy individuals had CTCs positive for CK19 mRNA. The positive rate of CK19 mRNA in healthy patients was significantly lower than that in samples from the advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients (P < 0.001). CK19 mRNA was observed in 39.1% of esophageal cancers (9/23), 40.0% of gastric cancers (36/90), 51.6% of colon cancers (16/31), and 48.1% of rectal cancers (13/27). Among the 171 patients, 26.8% of male patients (30/112) and 74.6% of female patients (44/59) were positive for CK19 mRNA. We next examined TK1 protein expression in 96 patients with gastrointestinal cancer by chemiluminescence dot blot assay. Sixty-six (68.8%) were positive for TK1 protein. TK1 expression was observed in 81.8% of esophageal cancers (9/11), 74.5% of gastric cancers (38/51), and 55.9% of colorectal cancers (19/34). Both TK1 protein and CK19 mRNA were detected in 36 (37.5%) of the 96 patients. Thirty (31.3%) of the 96 patients were negative for TK1. Fifteen (15.6%) of the 96 patients were TK1 protein-negative and CK19 mRNA-positive.

Survival analysis

The association of CK19 mRNA expression with OS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method [Figure 1]. The results indicated that patients with positive CK19 mRNA expression had significantly shorter OS times than those who were negative for CK19 mRNA expression (median OS 7.7 vs. 9.7 months, respectively; P = 0.02).
Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with positive or negative expression of CK19 mRNA. CK19: Cytokeratin-19.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with positive or negative expression of CK19 mRNA. CK19: Cytokeratin-19. Patients who were positive for CK19 mRNA and TK1 protein expression had significantly shorter OS times than patients who were positive for CK19 mRNA and negative for TK1 protein expression. Accordingly, patients who were positive for CK19 mRNA and TK1 protein expression had shorter OS times than those who were positive for CK19 mRNA and negative for TK1 protein expression (median OS 6.1 vs. 9.1 months, respectively; P = 0.028; Figure 2).
Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with CK19 mRNA positive and TK1 protein positive or CK19 mRNA positive but TK1 protein negative. CK19: Cytokeratin-19; TK1: Thymidine kinase-1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with CK19 mRNA positive and TK1 protein positive or CK19 mRNA positive but TK1 protein negative. CK19: Cytokeratin-19; TK1: Thymidine kinase-1.

Univariate and multivariate analyses

In the univariate analysis, positive CK19 mRNA expression was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes (P = 0.027), and CK19 mRNA associated with TK1 was significantly related to OS (P = 0.031). Based on a multivariate Cox regression analysis, CK19 mRNA together with TK1 protein expression (P = 0.024) was an independent predictor for OS in gastrointestinal cancer patients [Table 2].
Table 2

Multivariate analysis for overall survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer (n = 96)

VariablesHR (95% CI)P
Gender (male vs. female)0.801 (0.390–1.642)0.544
Age (<50 vs. ≥50 years)0.976 (0.948–1.006)0.117
Metastatic site (1–2 vs. 3–4)1.393 (0.570–3.832)1.478
Route of metastasis (lymph nodes vs. blood)0.910 (0.550–2.403)1.150
Differentiation (poor vs. well/moderate)0.870 (0.605–1.250)1.548
CK19 and TK1 (CK19 positive and TK1 positive vs. CK19 positive but TK1 negative)0.366 (0.152–0.876)0.024

CK19: Cytokeratin-19; TK1: Thymidine kinase-1; CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio.

Multivariate analysis for overall survival in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer (n = 96) CK19: Cytokeratin-19; TK1: Thymidine kinase-1; CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio.

DISCUSSION

The presence of CTCs has been analyzed in breast[614] and bladder cancer as has the presence of TK1 protein in breast and lung cancer.[17] However, the significance of CTCs and TK1 expression in the clinical setting and their prognostic value in gastrointestinal cancer has not yet been established. Therefore, the current study investigated whether CTCs were associated with TK1 in terms of protein levels and whether CTCs and TK1 levels had prognostic significance in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Malignant cells detached from primary tumors become invasive. These cells might then intravasate into the blood or lymphatic circulation and subsequently extravasate from the circulation and establish a secondary tumor in another organ far from the primary tumor.[2021] The detection of CTCs has been well demonstrated in breast, lung, colon, prostate, and bladder cancers, melanoma, and other malignancies.[2223242526] Although CTC detection can contribute to tumor diagnosis and help identify patients with advanced bladder cancer, such assays cannot be used as initial screening diagnostic tests due to their low sensitivity.[27] PCR-based methods are commonly used, rapid, and low-cost methods for detecting CTCs.[28] The utility of CTCs as biomarkers for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients with various cancers has been revealed in many studies.[2930] TK is a key enzyme in the pyrimidine salvage pathway, catalyzing the transfer of the terminal phosphate from adenosine triphosphate to the 5’-hydroxyl group of thymidine, producing deoxyadenosine triphosphate, which is subsequently incorporated into DNA. There are two forms of cellular TK enzymes; the cytoplasmic form, TK1, and the mitochondrial form, TK2. TK2 is cell-cycle independent whereas the level of TK1 protein is tightly correlated with the S and G2 phases of the cell-cycle and thus to overall cell proliferation. TK1 plays a role in regulating the intracellular thymidine pools throughout the cell-cycle but is probably also involved in the DNA repair process.[18] In proliferating normal cells and tumor cells, the synthesis of TK1 starts at the latter stage of the G1 phase and significantly increases until the late S and G2 phases.[31] TK1 in nonproliferating cells and in the serum of healthy people is minimal or undetectable.[31] TK1 also provides information on recurrence, on the 5-year survival of cancer patients and is useful for monitoring the outcome of tumor therapy in lung, rectal, breast, and cervical cancer patients.[1831] Thus, elevated TK1 is an important risk factor indicating a high tumor proliferation capacity, leading to shorter survival. In the study, we revealed the frequency of CK19 and TK1 expression in patients with metastatic and recurrent gastrointestinal cancer. At the same time, we investigated the value of CK19 and TK1 as prognostic indicators of advanced gastrointestinal cancer. CK19 mRNA was observed in 74 (43.3%) of all 171 advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients. TK1 was positive in 66 (68.8%) of 96 patients. The results indicate that positive CK19 expression predicts poor OS in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer; however, that patients who are positive for CK19 but negative for TK1 might have a better prognosis. In other words, patients who are positive for both CK19 and TK1 expression have worse OS than those who are positive for CK19 but negative for TK1 expression in advanced gastrointestinal cancer. In conclusion, co-expression of CK19 and TK1 might be crucial for the progression of tumors and, therefore, for the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal cancer, indicating that the expression of these might be considered as independent prognostic markers. More studies are urgently required to test the clinical utility of using CTCs and TK1 in liquid biopsies to contribute to personalized treatment strategies in gastrointestinal cancer.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers detecting circulating melanoma cells by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction: methodological pitfalls and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Adrianos Nezos; Peter Lembessis; Antigone Sourla; Nikolaos Pissimissis; Helen Gogas; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Circulating tumor cell analysis in metastatic triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Mark Jesus M Magbanua; Lisa A Carey; Amy DeLuca; Jimmy Hwang; Janet H Scott; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Erica L Mayer; P Kelly Marcom; Minetta C Liu; Francisco J Esteva; John W Park; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Identification of genomic signatures in circulating tumor cells from breast cancer.

Authors:  Nisha Kanwar; Pingzhao Hu; Philippe Bedard; Mark Clemons; David McCready; Susan J Done
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Circulating tumor cells at each follow-up time point during therapy of metastatic breast cancer patients predict progression-free and overall survival.

Authors:  Daniel F Hayes; Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; M Craig Miller; Jeri Matera; W Jeffrey Allard; Gerald V Doyle; Leon W W M Terstappen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection for CEA, CK20 and CK19 mRNA in peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Dong Xu; Xu-fen Li; Shu Zheng; Wen-zhi Jiang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Cytokeratin-19 and mammaglobin gene expression in circulating tumor cells from metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials, N0234/336/436/437.

Authors:  Monica M Reinholz; Kathleen A Kitzmann; Kathleen Tenner; David Hillman; Amylou C Dueck; Timothy J Hobday; Donald W Northfelt; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Vivek Roy; Betsy LaPlant; Jake B Allred; Philip J Stella; Wilma L Lingle; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Circulating tumor cells in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 7.027

8.  Serum thymidine kinase activity compared with CA 15-3 in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer within a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Bjöhle; J Bergqvist; J S Gronowitz; H Johansson; L Carlsson; Z Einbeigi; B Linderholm; N Loman; M Malmberg; M Söderberg; M Sundquist; T M Walz; M Fernö; J Bergh; T Hatschek
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites.

Authors:  Ann F Chambers; Alan C Groom; Ian C MacDonald
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Flow cytometric analysis of CK19 expression in the peripheral blood of breast carcinoma patients: relevance for circulating tumor cell detection.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Yanyan Wang; Yajing Liu; Min Cheng; Xu Wu; Haiming Wei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification of Biomarkers Correlated with the TNM Staging and Overall Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Xiaoping Liu; Tongzu Liu; Xiangyu Meng; Xiaohong Yin; Cheng Fang; Di Huang; Yue Cao; Hong Weng; Xiantao Zeng; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Clinical Significance and Role of TK1, CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 72-4 levels in Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Swarnima Singh; Rakesh Kumar; Uday Kumar; Rekha Kumari
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-11-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.